68562-41-4
Primary Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 Deficiency
Mecasermin is a highly purified, biosynthetic form of human insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), produced through recombinant DNA technology.[1] It is classified pharmacologically as a somatotropin agonist and belongs to the therapeutic class of insulin-like growth factors.[2] Marketed globally under the brand name Increlex, mecasermin has also been identified by other names in research and development contexts, including Myotrophin, FK-780, and Somatomedin-1.[1]
The primary and approved therapeutic application of mecasermin is as a replacement therapy for endogenous IGF-1. It is indicated for the long-term treatment of growth failure in pediatric patients with severe primary IGF-1 deficiency (SPIGFD).[1][ This specific and narrowly defined condition is characterized by an inability to produce sufficient IGF-1 despite normal or elevated levels of growth hormone (GH), rendering GH therapy ineffective. Mecasermin directly addresses this downstream defect, providing the essential mediator for statural growth.]
Mecasermin is a product of advanced biotechnology, specifically manufactured using genetically engineered Escherichia coli bacteria.[10] The manufacturing process is a multi-step procedure that begins with the production of rhIGF-1 in an inactive, unfolded form within the periplasmic space of the bacterial cells. This crude protein is then isolated and subjected to a controlled refolding process to achieve its precise, biologically active three-dimensional conformation. The final stage involves a rigorous purification cascade, employing column chromatography and ultrafiltration, to remove process-related impurities (e.g., host cell proteins) and product-related variants, ensuring the high purity and safety of the final drug substance.[10]
The choice of an E. coli expression system has direct implications for the final molecular structure of mecasermin. Unlike mammalian cell culture systems, bacterial systems cannot perform complex post-translational modifications such as glycosylation. Consequently, mecasermin is a non-glycosylated polypeptide.[10][ While this simplifies the manufacturing process and can enhance production efficiency, it also distinguishes the recombinant protein from some of its endogenous counterparts and other therapeutic proteins. The absence of glycosylation can influence a protein's pharmacokinetic profile, including its stability and half-life, and potentially its immunogenicity. This underscores the critical importance of the refolding and purification steps to ensure that the final product is structurally identical to native human IGF-1 and free from contaminants that could provoke an immune response.]
Structurally, mecasermin is a single-chain polypeptide composed of 70 amino acids. Its conformation is stabilized by three intramolecular disulfide bridges, which are essential for its biological activity. The specific linkages are between cysteine residues at positions 6 and 48, and 18 and 61.[6] Critically, the primary amino acid sequence of mecasermin is identical to that of native, endogenously produced human IGF-1, ensuring that it can bind to and activate the IGF-1 receptor with the same affinity and specificity as the natural hormone.[6]
From a chemical standpoint, mecasermin is defined by the molecular formula C331H512N94O101S7. Its molecular weight has been confirmed to be approximately 7648.71 g·mol⁻¹, which is in close agreement with the theoretically calculated mass of 7649.6 daltons for the 70-amino acid polypeptide.[1]
Identifier | Value | Source |
---|---|---|
International Nonproprietary Name | Mecasermin | 10 |
Brand Name | Increlex | 1 |
Drug Type | Biotech | |
DrugBank Accession Number | DB01277 | 1 |
CAS Registry Number | 68562-41-4 | 1 |
ATC Code | H01AC03 | 1 |
FDA UNII | 7GR9I2683O | 1 |
Molecular Formula | C331H512N94O101S7 | 1 |
Molar Mass | 7648.71 g·mol⁻¹ | 1 |
The mechanism of action of mecasermin is fundamentally rooted in its function as a direct replacement for endogenous insulin-like growth factor-1, thereby circumventing defects in the growth hormone (GH)-IGF-1 axis. In healthy individuals, GH secreted from the pituitary gland binds to GH receptors on hepatocytes (liver cells) and other tissues, stimulating the synthesis and secretion of IGF-1. IGF-1 then acts as the principal mediator of GH's anabolic and growth-promoting effects.[4]
However, in patients with severe primary IGF-1 deficiency, such as those with Laron syndrome, this pathway is disrupted. These individuals may have genetic mutations affecting the GH receptor or post-receptor signaling pathways. As a result, their tissues are insensitive to GH, leading to a failure to produce adequate amounts of IGF-1 despite having normal or even elevated circulating levels of GH.[4] Mecasermin therapy is designed to act downstream of this physiological blockade. By providing an exogenous source of IGF-1, it bypasses the non-functional GH receptor and directly restores the necessary signal for somatic growth.[4]
Once administered, mecasermin binds with high affinity to the Type I IGF-1 receptor (IGF-1R). This receptor is a member of the tyrosine kinase receptor superfamily and is ubiquitously expressed on the surface of virtually all cell types throughout the body.[4] The binding of mecasermin to the IGF-1R induces a conformational change in the receptor, leading to its dimerization and subsequent autophosphorylation on specific tyrosine residues within its intracellular domain. This activation event serves as a docking site for various intracellular substrate and adapter proteins, primarily the insulin-receptor substrates (IRS1/2) and Shc.[4]
[The phosphorylation of these substrates triggers the activation of two major downstream signaling cascades that are central to the biological effects of IGF-1:]
The concerted action of these two pathways—the PI3K-AKT pathway driving cell growth and survival, and the MAPK pathway driving cell proliferation—results in the comprehensive promotion of somatic growth, affecting skeletal tissue, cells, and organs.[4]
[The pharmacodynamic effects of mecasermin are a direct reflection of the physiological roles of IGF-1 and are broadly categorized into growth-promoting and metabolic actions.]
The primary and intended pharmacodynamic effect is the stimulation of statural growth in children with IGF-1 deficiency. This is a complex process mediated by the activation of IGF-1R in various tissues. Specifically, mecasermin promotes mitogenesis (cell division) in multiple tissue types, stimulates the proliferation and differentiation of chondrocytes within the cartilaginous growth plates of long bones, and increases overall organ size. The cumulative result of these cellular actions is an increase in linear bone growth and an overall increase in body size and mass.[12]
In addition to its anabolic effects, mecasermin exerts potent metabolic effects, particularly on carbohydrate metabolism. These effects are described as "insulin-like" because the IGF-1R shares significant structural and functional homology with the insulin receptor, and their downstream signaling pathways (especially the PI3K-AKT pathway) overlap considerably. Mecasermin enhances insulin sensitivity, stimulates glucose uptake and utilization in peripheral tissues such as muscle and fat, and suppresses the production of glucose by the liver (hepatic gluconeogenesis).[4] The net effect of these actions is a significant reduction in blood glucose concentrations. This powerful glucose-lowering effect is not an off-target side effect but an intrinsic, on-target consequence of the drug's mechanism of action. The same PI3K-AKT signaling that drives therapeutic growth is also responsible for this potent metabolic effect. This duality is fundamental to understanding the clinical profile of mecasermin, as it directly explains why hypoglycemia is the most common and clinically significant adverse event associated with its use.[4]
[The pharmacokinetic profile of mecasermin describes its movement into, through, and out of the body.]
Administration and Absorption: Mecasermin is formulated for subcutaneous injection, which is the sole route of administration.[1] Following subcutaneous injection in healthy adult subjects, the drug is completely absorbed, exhibiting a bioavailability of 100%.[14]
Distribution: Upon entering the systemic circulation, free IGF-1 is rapidly bound by a family of six specific insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins (IGFBPs). Over 80% of circulating IGF-1 becomes part of a large, non-covalent ternary complex, which consists of one molecule of IGF-1, one molecule of IGFBP-3 (the most abundant binding protein), and one molecule of a glycoprotein known as the acid-labile subunit (ALS).[12][ This 150 kDa complex acts as a physiological reservoir, protecting IGF-1 from rapid clearance and modulating its delivery to target tissues. In pediatric patients with severe primary IGFD, the volume of distribution (]
Vd) for mecasermin has been determined to be approximately 0.257 L/kg.[12]
Metabolism and Elimination: As a polypeptide, mecasermin is expected to undergo metabolic degradation through proteolytic pathways, primarily in the liver and kidneys. It is broken down into smaller, inactive peptides and constituent amino acids, which are then re-utilized by the body or eliminated.[12] Specific studies detailing the effects of renal or hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of mecasermin have not been conducted, and this remains an area with limited data.[15]
Half-Life and Clearance: In the target population of children with severe primary IGFD, the mean elimination half-life of mecasermin is approximately 5.8 hours.[1] An important pharmacokinetic characteristic of mecasermin is that its clearance from the body is inversely proportional to the circulating concentration of IGFBP-3.[12][ This relationship has profound clinical implications. Since patients with primary IGFD may have dysregulated levels of IGFBPs as part of their underlying pathology, the drug's half-life and systemic exposure can vary significantly between individuals, even at the same weight-based dose. A patient with lower IGFBP-3 levels will clear the drug more rapidly, potentially leading to lower overall exposure and a different peak-to-trough concentration profile. This inherent variability, dictated by the patient's own pathophysiology, underscores the necessity of careful, individualized dose titration and monitoring, as a standardized dosing approach may not yield predictable pharmacokinetic outcomes across all patients.]
A related but distinct medication, mecasermin rinfabate (brand name Iplex), was developed as a 1:1 molar complex of recombinant human IGF-1 (mecasermin) and recombinant human IGFBP-3.[1] The co-formulation with its primary binding protein was designed to mimic the natural ternary complex and prolong the drug's duration of action. This was successfully demonstrated in pharmacokinetic studies, where the half-life of mecasermin administered as mecasermin rinfabate was extended to 13.4 hours in patients with severe primary IGFD, more than double that of mecasermin alone.[1]
Parameter | Mecasermin (Increlex) | Mecasermin Rinfabate (Iplex) | Context / Patient Population |
---|---|---|---|
Route of Administration | Subcutaneous | Subcutaneous | Pediatric patients |
Bioavailability | 100% | Not specified | Healthy subjects (for mecasermin) |
Time to Peak Concentration (Tmax) | ~2 hours | 11.3 ± 6.2 hours | Severe Primary IGFD |
Elimination Half-life (t1/2) | ~5.8 hours | 13.4 ± 2.7 hours | Severe Primary IGFD |
Volume of Distribution (Vd/F) | 0.257 ± 0.073 L/kg | Not specified | Severe Primary IGFD |
Protein Binding | >80% (bound to IGFBPs) | Administered as a complex with IGFBP-3 | In blood |
Mecasermin is approved for the long-term treatment of growth failure in a very specific pediatric population. The indication is for children aged 2 years and older who are diagnosed with severe primary insulin-like growth factor-1 deficiency (SPIGFD).[2][ The diagnosis of SPIGFD is rigorously defined by a triad of criteria:]
This definition specifically identifies children whose growth failure is due to an inability to produce or respond to IGF-1, rather than a deficiency of GH itself. The indication also extends to a small subset of patients who have a GH gene deletion and, as a result of treatment with exogenous GH, have developed neutralizing antibodies that render further GH therapy ineffective.[2]
It is explicitly stated that mecasermin is not a substitute for GH therapy in its approved indications. Furthermore, it is not intended for the treatment of secondary forms of IGF-1 deficiency, which may arise from conditions such as GH deficiency, malnutrition, hypothyroidism, or the chronic use of pharmacologic doses of corticosteroids. These underlying conditions must be identified and corrected before considering mecasermin therapy.[2]
The clinical efficacy of mecasermin in this target population is well-established and profound. The regulatory approvals were based on data from several open-label clinical trials involving children with SPIGFD. In a pivotal pooled analysis of 76 children, treatment with mecasermin resulted in a dramatic acceleration of growth. The mean height velocity increased from a baseline rate of 2.8 cm/year to 8.0 cm/year during the first year of therapy.[7] This nearly threefold increase in growth rate is a highly significant and clinically meaningful outcome for children facing extreme short stature. Follow-up data showed that growth velocities remained elevated above baseline for up to eight years of continuous treatment, leading to substantial gains in final adult height.[7][ This large effect size was a critical factor in its approval, as it provided a clear and compelling benefit that could be weighed against the drug's significant safety considerations. For a niche therapy with inherent risks, demonstrating such a transformative benefit is essential for establishing a favorable risk-benefit profile.]
[Beyond its approved indication, mecasermin has been investigated for other conditions, with Rett Syndrome being the most prominent example.]
Rett Syndrome (RTT): Rett Syndrome is a severe neurodevelopmental disorder caused by mutations in the MECP2 gene. Preclinical studies in mouse models of RTT provided a strong rationale for investigating IGF-1 as a potential therapy. These studies suggested that IGF-1 could reverse many of the synaptic and neuronal deficits seen in the disorder, leading to improvements in behavior, respiratory function, and motor skills.[3][ This led to a clinical development program in humans.]
A Phase 1 open-label, multiple ascending dose trial (NCT01253317) was conducted in 12 girls with RTT.[23] The study successfully met its primary objectives, demonstrating that mecasermin was safe and generally well-tolerated in this population. A key finding from this trial was the confirmation of target engagement within the central nervous system (CNS). Analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) showed a significant increase in IGF-1 levels following treatment, confirming that the drug could cross the blood-brain barrier and reach its intended site of action.[23] Preliminary efficacy data from the open-label extension phase were encouraging, suggesting potential improvements in some of the core symptoms of RTT, including breathing abnormalities (apnea), anxiety, and mood.[23]
However, the promise of these early findings was not realized in a subsequent, more rigorous Phase 2 placebo-controlled, crossover trial (NCT01777542) involving 30 girls with RTT.[27] This pivotal study failed to demonstrate a statistically significant difference between mecasermin and placebo on its primary clinical endpoints. In fact, some secondary measures, including certain EEG parameters and mood scale scores, suggested a worsening of symptoms with active treatment.[28]
The Rett Syndrome program serves as a salient example of the challenges inherent in translating preclinical findings from animal models to clinical efficacy in humans, particularly for complex neurodevelopmental disorders. The Phase 1 trial successfully validated the pharmacological hypothesis—that systemically administered mecasermin could increase IGF-1 levels in the CNS. However, the Phase 2 trial demonstrated that this biological effect did not translate into a meaningful clinical benefit. This outcome suggests that the pathophysiology of Rett Syndrome is likely far more complex than a simple deficiency of IGF-1 signaling, and that the downstream consequences of the MECP2[ mutation may not be readily reversible by this specific therapeutic modality. This highlights a critical gap that often exists between successful target engagement and the achievement of a desired clinical outcome in CNS drug development.]
Other Potential Uses:[ Mecasermin has also been explored in other clinical areas, leveraging its metabolic and anabolic properties.]
[The clinical use of mecasermin is governed by a comprehensive understanding of its safety profile. The adverse effects are largely predictable consequences of IGF-1's potent physiological actions.]
[The incidence and nature of adverse reactions have been well-characterized in clinical trials and post-marketing surveillance.]
System Organ Class | Frequency | Adverse Event | Source |
---|---|---|---|
Endocrine/Metabolic | Very Common (>10%) | Hypoglycemia | 14 |
Common (1-10%) | Severe Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Seizure, Loss of Consciousness | 14 | |
Nervous System | Common (1-10%) | Headache, Dizziness, Convulsion | 14 |
Post-Marketing | Intracranial Hypertension | 8 | |
Immune System / General | Very Common (>10%) | Tonsillar Hypertrophy | 14 |
Common (1-10%) | Thymus Hypertrophy | 14 | |
Less Common (<1%) | Anaphylaxis, Generalized Urticaria, Angioedema | 32 | |
Local Site Reactions | Common (1-10%) | Lipohypertrophy, Bruising at injection site | 14 |
Cardiovascular | Common (1-10%) | Cardiac Murmur | 14 |
Musculoskeletal | Common (1-10%) | Arthralgia (Joint Pain) | 14 |
Post-Marketing | Osteonecrosis/Avascular Necrosis (assoc. with SCFE) | 32 | |
Ear and Labyrinth | Common (1-10%) | Otitis Media | 14 |
Neoplasms | Post-Marketing | Benign and Malignant Neoplasms | 32 |
[The safety profile of mecasermin is a direct reflection of the fundamental biology of IGF-1. The constellation of common and serious adverse events is not a series of random toxicities but rather a coherent set of outcomes stemming from the drug's powerful, systemic physiological effects. IGF-1 is a potent insulin-like molecule, which logically leads to hypoglycemia as the primary dose-limiting toxicity. It is a powerful mitogen and growth factor for all tissues, which explains the risks of lymphoid tissue hypertrophy (tonsils, adenoids), the potential for progression of scoliosis during rapid catch-up growth, and the theoretical concern regarding neoplasia. The occurrence of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is also a known complication of any therapy that induces rapid linear growth in susceptible children. Therefore, managing the safety of mecasermin therapy is synonymous with managing the physiological consequences of restoring or inducing supraphysiological levels of IGF-1 activity.]
[Due to its potent biological effects, the use of mecasermin is accompanied by several significant warnings and precautions.]
Contraindications:[ The use of mecasermin is strictly contraindicated in several situations:]
Notably, despite the severity of these potential risks, regulatory documents indicate that mecasermin does not carry a "black box" warning in its labeling.[21][ This absence is a significant regulatory statement. It suggests that agencies like the FDA have judged that the risks, while serious, are predictable and can be adequately managed through the comprehensive warnings, precautions, and highly specific risk management protocols detailed in the product label. This implies a determination that for the intended, well-defined patient population with a high unmet medical need, the substantial benefits of treatment outweigh the manageable risks, provided that therapy is prescribed and overseen by specialists who adhere strictly to the established guidelines.]
[The most clinically significant drug-drug interactions with mecasermin are pharmacodynamic in nature and relate to its effects on glucose metabolism.]
Interacting Drug Class | Example Drugs | Mechanism of Interaction | Clinical Management Recommendation |
---|---|---|---|
Insulins | Insulin aspart, insulin glargine, regular human insulin | Pharmacodynamic synergism | Increased risk of hypoglycemia. Monitor blood glucose closely. A reduction in insulin dosage may be required. |
Sulfonylureas | Glipizide, glyburide, glimepiride | Pharmacodynamic synergism | Increased risk of hypoglycemia. Monitor blood glucose closely. A reduction in sulfonylurea dosage may be required. |
Other Hypoglycemic Agents | Acarbose, albiglutide, nateglinide | Pharmacodynamic synergism | Increased risk of hypoglycemia. Monitor blood glucose closely. |
Corticosteroids | Betamethasone, alclometasone | Pharmacodynamic antagonism | Increased risk of hyperglycemia; may decrease the therapeutic efficacy of mecasermin. Monitor blood glucose and growth response. |
Beta-2 Adrenergic Agonists | Albuterol | Pharmacodynamic antagonism | May decrease the therapeutic efficacy of mecasermin by increasing blood glucose. Monitor growth response. |
Tricyclic Antidepressants | Amitriptyline, amoxapine | Pharmacodynamic antagonism | May decrease the hypoglycemic activities of mecasermin. Monitor blood glucose. |
There are at least 24 drugs known to have moderate interactions with mecasermin, the vast majority of which either potentiate its hypoglycemic effect or antagonize its therapeutic action.[37][ Co-administration with any agent that affects blood glucose requires careful monitoring and potential dose adjustments.]
[The safe and effective use of mecasermin requires strict adherence to specific guidelines for dosing, administration, and patient monitoring.]
[The dosage of mecasermin must be individualized for each patient based on body weight, clinical response, and tolerance.]
[Proper administration technique is critical to the safety and efficacy of mecasermin therapy.]
The administration guidelines for mecasermin represent a core safety protocol, not merely a set of procedural instructions. The most critical aspect is the timing of the injection relative to food intake. The dose must be administered shortly before or after (within a 20-minute window) a meal or snack.[2][ This strict requirement is a direct clinical countermeasure designed to mitigate the drug's potent and predictable hypoglycemic effect. By ensuring that an exogenous supply of carbohydrates is available to coincide with the drug's peak glucose-lowering action, the risk of a dangerous drop in blood sugar is significantly reduced. Consequently, if a patient is unable to eat for any reason, the corresponding dose of mecasermin]
must be withheld. Furthermore, subsequent doses should never be increased to compensate for a missed dose.[2][ Adherence to this protocol is the primary factor that separates a therapeutic dose from a potentially dangerous one.]
[Ongoing and comprehensive patient monitoring is an integral part of mecasermin therapy.]
[The regulatory pathway of mecasermin reflects the specific challenges and considerations associated with developing therapies for rare diseases.]
The development and approval of Increlex in the United States were sponsored by Tercica, Inc..[41][ The key milestones in its regulatory journey were:]
The approved indication was for the long-term treatment of growth failure in children with severe primary IGF-1 deficiency or with GH gene deletion who have developed neutralizing antibodies to GH.[41]
[In Europe, mecasermin also followed a specialized regulatory path tailored for rare diseases.]
The EMA-approved indication is for the long-term treatment of growth failure in children and adolescents from 2 to 18 years of age with confirmed severe primary IGF-1 deficiency.[11]
The developmental history of mecasermin rinfabate (Iplex), the complex of rhIGF-1 and rhIGFBP-3, provides an instructive contrast. While developed for a similar indication, its regulatory journey in Europe had a different outcome. The marketing authorisation application for Iplex was formally withdrawn by its sponsor on March 26, 2007. This withdrawal followed an evaluation by the EMA's Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP), which had concluded that, based on the clinical data submitted at that time, the benefits of Iplex had not been sufficiently demonstrated to outweigh its identified risks.[44]
[The divergent regulatory outcomes for Increlex and Iplex, two closely related therapies for the same rare condition, offer a valuable perspective on the regulatory process for orphan drugs. The approval of Increlex under "exceptional circumstances" demonstrates a regulatory flexibility designed to address high unmet medical needs in diseases where comprehensive data collection is inherently challenging. However, the withdrawal of the Iplex application shows that this flexibility is not unlimited. The risk-benefit assessment remains paramount, and the clinical evidence, even if limited, must still be compelling enough to support a positive conclusion. This juxtaposition illustrates the fine line that regulatory agencies must navigate in the orphan drug landscape: balancing the imperative to facilitate patient access to novel therapies with the fundamental responsibility to uphold rigorous standards of safety and efficacy.]
[Mecasermin (Increlex) stands as a significant achievement in targeted biopharmaceutical therapy. It provides a highly effective, life-altering treatment for a precisely defined and vulnerable pediatric population: children with severe growth failure resulting from primary IGF-1 deficiency. For these patients, in whom conventional growth hormone therapy is ineffective, mecasermin offers a direct and potent mechanism to restore a critical physiological pathway, leading to profound and sustained improvements in linear growth. Its efficacy within this specific niche is both dramatic and undeniable.]
[However, the clinical profile of mecasermin is characterized by an intrinsic and inescapable duality. Its powerful, on-target mechanism of action—the very source of its remarkable therapeutic benefit—is simultaneously the source of its most significant and predictable risks. The drug's potent anabolic effects on skeletal and somatic growth are inextricably linked to its equally potent insulin-like effects on glucose metabolism. Consequently, the clinical management of mecasermin is a continuous exercise in balancing these two facets of its pharmacology, maximizing growth while minimizing the ever-present risk of hypoglycemia.]
[This duality elevates the importance of the drug's administration and monitoring protocols. The stringent guidelines—particularly the non-negotiable requirement to administer each dose in close temporal proximity to a meal or snack—are not merely ancillary instructions. They represent a core clinical risk management strategy that is embedded directly into the therapeutic regimen itself. Adherence to this protocol is the principal determinant of the drug's acute safety.]
[The attempts to expand mecasermin's therapeutic utility beyond SPIGFD, most notably in the clinical trials for Rett Syndrome, serve as a modern cautionary tale in translational medicine. These studies demonstrated that even with a robust preclinical rationale, a well-understood mechanism of action, and confirmed target engagement within the central nervous system, translating these pharmacological successes into meaningful clinical efficacy for a complex neurodevelopmental disorder remains a formidable and often elusive goal.]
[In conclusion, mecasermin is best understood as a highly specialized and powerful therapeutic tool, not a broad-spectrum growth or metabolic agent. Its regulatory journey, marked by orphan drug designations and approvals under exceptional circumstances, underscores the evolving regulatory landscape for rare disease therapies. Mecasermin will undoubtedly remain a cornerstone of treatment for children with SPIGFD, a testament to its targeted design and profound impact. Its future likely lies not in broad indication expansion, but in the continued refinement of its use within this well-defined therapeutic window, where its substantial benefits can be realized while its inherent risks are meticulously managed.]
Published at: August 27, 2025
This report is continuously updated as new research emerges.
Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.
© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.