C17H25N3O5S
96036-03-2
Bacterial Infections, Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections (cIAIs), Meningitis, Bacterial, Complicated Urinary Tract Infection caused by susceptible bacteria, Complicated skin infection bacterial
Meropenem is a potent, broad-spectrum antibiotic administered intravenously and classified within the carbapenem subclass of β-lactam agents.[1] As a "small molecule" drug, it represents a critical tool in the modern medical armamentarium for combating severe and complex bacterial infections, particularly those acquired in hospital settings.[3] Its clinical utility extends to a wide array of life-threatening conditions, including complicated intra-abdominal infections, complicated skin and skin structure infections, bacterial meningitis, sepsis, and pneumonia.[1] Marketed under primary brand names such as Merrem, Meronem, and others globally, Meropenem is often reserved as a last-resort therapy when infections are caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens that have developed resistance to other classes of antibiotics, such as penicillins and cephalosporins.[1] This strategic positioning underscores its importance in critical care medicine but also places it at the forefront of the global challenge of antimicrobial resistance, necessitating stringent antibiotic stewardship to preserve its efficacy for future generations.[5]
Meropenem is chemically defined as a carbapenemcarboxylic acid and is classified by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a penem antibacterial agent.[7] In its commercial form, it is supplied as a sterile, white to light yellow or off-white crystalline powder for reconstitution.[1] This formulation is not pure meropenem but rather a carefully prepared blend of meropenem trihydrate and anhydrous sodium carbonate.[1] The sodium carbonate serves as an essential buffering agent, enhancing the drug's stability in solution after it is reconstituted for intravenous administration. The molecular formula of meropenem is
C17H25N3O5S, corresponding to a molecular weight of 383.46 g/mol.[2]
The drug demonstrates solubility in various solvents, including dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), ethanol, and water.[3] Its hydrophilic nature is a defining characteristic that, while facilitating its distribution in bodily fluids, concurrently contributes to its poor permeability across the gastrointestinal epithelium, rendering it unsuitable for oral administration.[1] A pivotal feature of its molecular architecture is the presence of a 1-β-methyl group. This specific structural modification confers a significant clinical advantage by providing stability against hydrolysis by human renal dehydropeptidase-I (DHP-I), an enzyme that readily degrades earlier carbapenems like imipenem.[12]
Meropenem's chemistry embodies a notable paradox. The stereochemistry of its β-lactam ring is engineered to be highly resistant to degradation by a wide range of bacterial β-lactamase enzymes, which is the basis of its broad-spectrum activity against many resistant organisms.[1] However, this same ring is intrinsically unstable in aqueous environments and is highly susceptible to non-enzymatic hydrolysis.[1] This chemical instability leads to a relatively rapid degradation of the drug in solution, reducing its antibacterial potency over time. This degradation process is often accompanied by a visible color change in the reconstituted solution, shifting from colorless or pale yellow to a more vivid yellowish hue, which serves as a visual indicator of the hydrolysis of the β-lactam ring's amide bond.[1]
Identifier | Value | Source(s) |
---|---|---|
Drug Name | Meropenem | 1 |
DrugBank ID | DB00760 | 1 |
Type | Small Molecule | [User Query] |
CAS Number | 96036-03-2 (anhydrous) | 2 |
Related CAS Number | 119478-56-7 (trihydrate) | 3 |
Molecular Formula | C17H25N3O5S | 2 |
Molecular Weight | 383.46 g/mol | 2 |
IUPAC Name | (4R,5S,6S)-3-sulfanyl-6--4-methyl-7-oxo-1-azabicyclo[3.2.0]hept-2-ene-2-carboxylic acid | 3 |
InChI | InChI=1S/C17H25N3O5S/c1-7-12-11(8(2)21)16(23)20(12)13(17(24)25)14(7)26-9-5-10(18-6-9)15(22)19(3)4/h7-12,18,21H,5-6H2,1-4H3,(H,24,25)/t7-,8-,9+,10+,11-,12-/m1/s1 | 1 |
InChIKey | DMJNNHOOLUXYBV-PQTSNVLCSA-N | 1 |
SMILES | C[C@@H]1[C@@H]2[C@H](C(=O)N2C(=C1S[C@H]3C[C@H](NC3)C(=O)N(C)C)C(=O)O)[C@@H](C)O | 3 |
Synonyms | Merrem, Penem, Ronem, SM-7338, ICI 194660, Meropen | 1 |
The development of meropenem is a story not of serendipitous discovery but of deliberate, rational drug design, born from the necessity to overcome the pharmacological shortcomings of its predecessors. Its history is deeply intertwined with the escalating battle against bacterial resistance to β-lactam antibiotics.[12] The journey began in the 1970s with the discovery of naturally occurring compounds like the olivanic acids from
Streptomyces clavuligerus. These molecules possessed the core "carbapenem backbone" and showed β-lactamase inhibitory activity, but they were too chemically unstable and had poor bacterial cell penetration, precluding their clinical development.[12]
A watershed moment came with the isolation of thienamycin from the bacterium Streptomyces cattleya.[12] Thienamycin was the first true carbapenem and exhibited exceptionally potent, broad-spectrum antibacterial activity, establishing it as the parent compound and structural model for all subsequent drugs in this class.[12] However, like the olivanic acids, thienamycin suffered from chemical instability, which spurred the search for more robust derivatives suitable for clinical use.
This search led to the development of imipenem, the first carbapenem to be commercialized, which became available in 1985.[12] Imipenem offered improved chemical stability over thienamycin, but its clinical use revealed a significant metabolic liability. It was rapidly hydrolyzed and inactivated in the kidneys by a human enzyme, dehydropeptidase-I (DHP-I).[12] This not only reduced the drug's efficacy but also led to the formation of potentially nephrotoxic metabolites.[13] The solution to this problem was to co-administer imipenem with cilastatin, a specific DHP-I inhibitor that protected imipenem from degradation, ensuring therapeutic concentrations in the urine and body.[12] While effective, this two-drug combination was pharmacologically complex.
The development of meropenem represents the next, more elegant step in this evolutionary process. Medicinal chemists sought to design a carbapenem that was intrinsically stable to DHP-I, thereby eliminating the need for a co-administered inhibitor. The critical breakthrough was a specific, targeted synthetic modification: the addition of a methyl group at the 1-β position of the carbapenem core structure.[12] This seemingly minor structural change sterically hindered the DHP-I enzyme, rendering meropenem resistant to its hydrolytic activity.[13] This innovation was a triumph of medicinal chemistry, directly solving the primary metabolic problem of imipenem. As a result, meropenem could be administered as a single agent, simplifying therapy and offering a superior pharmacokinetic profile.
Meropenem was first used clinically in 1994 and received its initial U.S. FDA approval in 1996, marking its entry as a "second-generation" carbapenem.[4] Recognizing the continuous evolution of bacterial resistance, particularly the emergence of carbapenemase-producing organisms, the therapeutic landscape continued to evolve. In August 2017, the FDA approved Vabomere, a combination product containing meropenem and vaborbactam, a novel β-lactamase inhibitor designed to protect meropenem from degradation by certain classes of carbapenemases, further extending the utility of this vital antibiotic.[7]
Meropenem, like all β-lactam antibiotics, exerts its potent bactericidal (cell-killing) effects by disrupting the synthesis of the bacterial cell wall, a structure essential for bacterial integrity and survival.[1] The process begins with the drug's ability to readily penetrate the outer layers of both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, allowing it to access its molecular targets within the periplasmic space.[8]
At the molecular level, the core of meropenem's activity lies in its covalent and irreversible binding to a group of essential bacterial enzymes known as Penicillin-Binding Proteins (PBPs).[8] PBPs play a crucial role in the final stages of peptidoglycan synthesis, specifically the transpeptidation step that cross-links the peptide chains of the glycan strands. This cross-linking process is what confers the rigid, mesh-like structure to the peptidoglycan layer, providing the cell wall with the mechanical strength necessary to withstand the high internal osmotic pressure of the bacterial cytoplasm.[14]
By acylating the active site of these PBP enzymes, meropenem effectively inhibits their function. This disruption of peptidoglycan synthesis and repair leads to the formation of a defective, weakened cell wall.[14] The compromised cell wall can no longer contain the cell's internal pressure, resulting in cell lysis and, ultimately, bacterial death.[7] Meropenem demonstrates a strong binding affinity for multiple PBP targets, which contributes to its broad spectrum of activity. Its strongest affinities have been identified for PBP 2, PBP 3, and PBP 4 in key Gram-negative pathogens like
Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and for PBP 1, PBP 2, and PBP 4 in the Gram-positive pathogen Staphylococcus aureus.[8] This multi-target engagement makes it more difficult for bacteria to develop resistance through a single PBP mutation.
The antibacterial efficacy of meropenem is best described by a time-dependent killing model.[22] This pharmacodynamic principle dictates that the crucial determinant of successful bacterial eradication is not the peak concentration (
Cmax) achieved by the drug, but rather the cumulative duration of time that the free (non-protein-bound) drug concentration in the plasma remains above the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) for the target pathogen. This parameter is expressed as the percentage of the dosing interval where the free drug concentration exceeds the MIC (%T>MIC).[22]
For meropenem, extensive clinical and microbiological studies have established that a bactericidal effect and optimal clinical outcomes are typically achieved when the %T>MIC is approximately 40% or greater.[22] This pharmacodynamic target is the scientific foundation for the recommended dosing regimens. The relatively short half-life of meropenem necessitates frequent administration, typically every 8 hours, to ensure that drug concentrations are maintained above the MIC for a sufficient portion of the dosing interval to achieve this 40% target, especially against less susceptible organisms. In critically ill patients or for infections caused by pathogens with higher MICs, strategies such as extended or continuous infusions are sometimes employed to maximize the %T>MIC and improve the probability of a successful outcome.
Meropenem is distinguished by its exceptionally broad spectrum of in vitro activity, which covers a vast range of clinically significant bacteria, including aerobic and anaerobic Gram-positive and Gram-negative species.[1]
Gram-Negative Activity: Meropenem is highly potent against most Enterobacteriaceae, such as Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterobacter species.[1] It is particularly valued for its consistent and potent activity against the opportunistic and often difficult-to-treat pathogen
Pseudomonas aeruginosa.[1] Compared to the first-generation carbapenem imipenem, meropenem generally exhibits slightly greater potency against Gram-negative organisms.[1]
Gram-Positive Activity: The drug is also effective against many Gram-positive bacteria, including methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), Streptococcus pneumoniae (including penicillin-susceptible isolates), Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus agalactiae, and viridans group streptococci.[24] It also has activity against vancomycin-susceptible isolates of
Enterococcus faecalis.[24] Its activity against Gram-positive cocci is generally considered robust, though slightly less potent than that of imipenem.[1]
Anaerobic Activity: Meropenem provides excellent coverage against a wide range of anaerobic bacteria, including Bacteroides fragilis, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, and Peptostreptococcus species, making it a suitable monotherapy agent for mixed aerobic/anaerobic infections such as complicated intra-abdominal infections.[1]
Activity against Resistant Strains: A cornerstone of meropenem's clinical value is its stability in the presence of many β-lactamase enzymes, including the extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) that confer resistance to most third-generation cephalosporins.[1] This makes it a first-line therapy for serious infections caused by ESBL-producing organisms. However, its effectiveness is compromised by the emergence of bacteria that produce carbapenem-hydrolyzing enzymes, known as carbapenemases. It is particularly susceptible to hydrolysis by metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs), such as NDM-1 and VIM types, and certain serine carbapenemases like KPC and some OXA types.[1]
The clinical interpretation of in vitro susceptibility testing is guided by established MIC breakpoints. These values, defined by regulatory bodies like the FDA, categorize a bacterial isolate as Susceptible, Intermediate, or Resistant, thereby informing the clinical decision to use meropenem.
Pathogen | MIC (μg/mL) for Susceptible (S) strains | MIC (μg/mL) for Intermediate (I) strains | MIC (μg/mL) for Resistant (R) strains |
---|---|---|---|
Enterobacteriaceae | ≤1 | 2 | ≥4 |
Pseudomonas aeruginosa | ≤2 | 4 | ≥8 |
Streptococcus pneumoniae | ≤0.25 | 0.5 | ≥1 |
Anaerobic bacteria | ≤4 | 8 | ≥16 |
Source: [19]
The pharmacokinetic profile of meropenem dictates its route of administration, dosing frequency, and suitability for treating infections in various body compartments. Its journey through the body is characterized by poor oral absorption, wide distribution, minimal metabolism, and rapid renal excretion.
Meropenem exhibits extremely poor oral bioavailability, estimated to be less than 2%.[1] This is a direct consequence of two key physicochemical properties. First, its hydrophilic (water-loving) nature significantly hinders its ability to passively diffuse across the lipid-rich membranes of the intestinal epithelium.[1] Second, it is chemically unstable in aqueous environments and susceptible to degradation within the gastrointestinal tract.[1] This poor absorption is further compounded by the action of intestinal efflux transporters, particularly P-glycoprotein (P-gp), which can actively pump any absorbed drug back into the gut lumen, effectively preventing it from reaching systemic circulation.[1]
The clinical consequence of this pharmacokinetic barrier is absolute. Meropenem cannot be administered orally and is formulated exclusively for parenteral use via the intravenous (IV) route in humans.[1] While animal studies have demonstrated high bioavailability following intramuscular (IM) or subcutaneous (SC) administration, these routes are not approved for clinical use in human patients.[1]
Once in the bloodstream, meropenem distributes extensively throughout the body, penetrating most tissues and fluids to a clinically significant degree.[16] A key factor facilitating this wide distribution is its very low rate of binding to plasma proteins, which is only about 2%.[11] This means that approximately 98% of the drug in circulation is "free" or unbound, and therefore pharmacologically active and available to diffuse from the bloodstream into infection sites.
The steady-state volume of distribution (Vd) in healthy adult volunteers ranges from approximately 12.5 to 21 liters, a value that suggests good penetration beyond the plasma into tissues.[16] Clinical studies have confirmed that meropenem achieves therapeutic concentrations in a wide variety of tissues relevant to its approved indications, including:
Critically for its use in CNS infections, meropenem effectively crosses the blood-brain barrier, particularly in the presence of meningeal inflammation, and achieves therapeutic concentrations in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).[14] This property underpins its specific FDA approval for the treatment of bacterial meningitis in pediatric patients.[24]
Meropenem undergoes minimal metabolism in the body.[26] The primary metabolic transformation is the non-enzymatic hydrolysis of the β-lactam ring, which opens the ring structure to form a single, primary metabolite.[8] This metabolite is microbiologically inactive and does not contribute to the drug's therapeutic effect.[8] As established during its development, meropenem is structurally resistant to hydrolysis by the human renal enzyme DHP-I, a key distinction from its predecessor, imipenem, which allows it to be administered without a metabolic inhibitor.[13]
The primary and predominant route of elimination for meropenem is renal excretion.[11] Approximately 70% of an administered intravenous dose is recovered from the urine as unchanged, active drug over a 12-hour period, with very little further excretion thereafter.[8] This high concentration of active drug in the urinary tract contributes to its efficacy in treating urinary tract infections.
The elimination half-life (t1/2) of meropenem in adults with normal renal function is short, approximately 1 hour.[8] In pediatric patients between 3 months and 2 years of age, the half-life is slightly extended to about 1.5 hours.[8] This rapid elimination profile is a major driver of the need for frequent (e.g., every 8 hours) dosing to maintain therapeutic concentrations.
The heavy reliance on renal clearance has a profound clinical implication: dosage adjustments are mandatory for patients with renal impairment. Failure to reduce the dose in patients with decreased kidney function will lead to drug accumulation, prolonged half-life, and a significantly increased risk of dose-related toxicities, most notably seizures.[14]
Parameter | Value | Clinical Significance & Source(s) |
---|---|---|
Bioavailability (Oral) | <2% (negligible) | Requires exclusive intravenous (IV) administration for systemic effect. 1 |
Plasma Protein Binding | ~2% | High fraction of free, pharmacologically active drug is available for distribution to tissues. 11 |
Volume of Distribution (Vd) | 12.5 – 21 L | Indicates wide distribution into most body tissues and fluids, including the CNS. 16 |
Elimination Half-Life (t1/2) | ~1 hour | Short half-life necessitates frequent (q8h) dosing to maintain therapeutic concentrations (%T>MIC). 8 |
Metabolism | Minimal; one inactive metabolite | The parent compound is responsible for virtually all antibacterial activity. Not susceptible to DHP-I. 8 |
Primary Excretion Route | Renal (via filtration and secretion) | Dosage adjustment based on creatinine clearance is critical in patients with renal impairment. 16 |
% Unchanged in Urine | ~70% | High concentrations of active drug are achieved in the urine. 8 |
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved meropenem for the treatment of specific, serious bacterial infections. A guiding principle for its use, emphasized in its labeling, is the importance of antibiotic stewardship: meropenem should be reserved for infections that are proven or strongly suspected to be caused by susceptible bacteria to mitigate the development of drug resistance.[18]
The official FDA-approved indications are:
Beyond its formal FDA-approved indications, the clinical utility of meropenem extends to several other critical areas, where its use is guided by clinical practice guidelines, extensive clinical experience, and its favorable pharmacological profile. This reliance on off-label prescribing is particularly prominent in treating the most critically ill patient populations where conducting large-scale, randomized controlled trials is often ethically or logistically prohibitive.
The significant gap between the formal regulatory label and real-world clinical practice underscores a fundamental reality in critical care medicine. Clinicians must often extrapolate from a drug's known pharmacology—its broad spectrum, CNS penetration, and safety profile—to make life-saving decisions in situations where randomized trial data is lacking. This creates a dynamic where "practice-based evidence" and expert guidelines fill the void left by the formal regulatory process, solidifying meropenem's role as an indispensable agent far beyond its labeled indications.
The correct dosing and administration of meropenem are paramount to ensuring clinical efficacy while minimizing the risk of toxicity and the development of resistance. Dosing regimens vary significantly based on patient age, weight, renal function, and the specific type and severity of the infection.
For adult patients with normal renal function (Creatinine Clearance [CrCl] > 50 mL/min), the following standard doses apply:
Pediatric dosing is highly specific and must be calculated carefully based on age and body weight.
Age Group | Type of Infection | Dose (mg/kg) | Maximum Dose per Administration | Dosing Interval | Source(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
< 3 months | Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections (cIAI) | 24 | |||
<32 wks GA & <2 wks PNA | 20 mg/kg | N/A | Every 12 hours | ||
<32 wks GA & ≥2 wks PNA | 20 mg/kg | N/A | Every 8 hours | ||
≥32 wks GA & <2 wks PNA | 20 mg/kg | N/A | Every 8 hours | ||
≥32 wks GA & ≥2 wks PNA | 30 mg/kg | N/A | Every 8 hours | ||
≥ 3 months | Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections (cSSSI) | 10 mg/kg | 500 mg | Every 8 hours | 24 |
cSSSI caused by P. aeruginosa | 20 mg/kg | 1 gram | Every 8 hours | 24 | |
Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections (cIAI) | 20 mg/kg | 1 gram | Every 8 hours | 24 | |
Bacterial Meningitis | 40 mg/kg | 2 grams | Every 8 hours | 24 |
Note: For pediatric patients weighing over 50 kg, standard adult dosages should be used. There is no experience or specific dosing recommendation for pediatric patients with renal impairment.[24]
As meropenem is primarily cleared by the kidneys, dose adjustment in patients with renal impairment is mandatory to prevent drug accumulation and associated toxicities. The following recommendations apply to adult patients; data for pediatric patients with renal impairment is lacking.[24] Creatinine clearance (CrCl) can be estimated using the Cockcroft-Gault formula or other standard methods.[24]
Creatinine Clearance (CrCl) (mL/min) | Dose Adjustment | Dosing Interval | Source(s) |
---|---|---|---|
> 50 | Recommended Dose (e.g., 500 mg or 1 g) | Every 8 hours | 29 |
26 – 50 | Recommended Dose | Every 12 hours | 29 |
10 – 25 | One-half Recommended Dose (e.g., 250 mg or 500 mg) | Every 12 hours | 29 |
< 10 | One-half Recommended Dose | Every 24 hours | 29 |
For patients undergoing hemodialysis, meropenem is effectively removed by the procedure. Therefore, the dose should be administered after the completion of a hemodialysis session to restore therapeutic drug levels.[10] There is insufficient data to provide dosing recommendations for patients on peritoneal dialysis.[10]
While meropenem is often described as being generally well-tolerated, especially in comparison to older carbapenems, this assessment must be carefully contextualized within its use for critically ill patients with life-threatening infections.[4] Its safety profile is favorable relative to the high-stakes clinical scenarios it is used in, but it is associated with a spectrum of adverse reactions ranging from common and mild to rare but severe and potentially fatal.
System Organ Class | Incidence | Adverse Reaction | Source(s) |
---|---|---|---|
Gastrointestinal | Common (1-10%) | Diarrhea, Nausea, Vomiting, Constipation | 1 |
Postmarketing | Clostridioides difficile-Associated Diarrhea (CDAD), Pseudomembranous Colitis | 25 | |
Dermatologic | Common (1-10%) | Rash (including diaper rash), Pruritus (itching) | 1 |
Postmarketing | Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions (SCARs): Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS), Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN), Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS), Erythema Multiforme (EM), Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis (AGEP) | 27 | |
Nervous System | Common (1-10%) | Headache | 1 |
Uncommon (0.1-1%) | Seizures, Paresthesia (tingling/numbness), Dizziness, Delirium | 1 | |
Local Site Reactions | Common (1-10%) | Inflammation, Pain, Phlebitis/Thrombophlebitis at injection site | 1 |
Hematologic | Common (1-10%) | Thrombocytosis (high platelet count), Anemia | 4 |
Uncommon (0.1-1%) | Thrombocytopenia (low platelet count), Eosinophilia, Leukopenia (low white blood cell count) | 38 | |
Postmarketing | Agranulocytosis, Hemolytic Anemia | 41 | |
Hepatic | Common (1-10%) | Increased liver enzymes (ALT, AST, ALP) | 4 |
Immune System | Postmarketing | Anaphylaxis, Angioedema | 1 |
Musculoskeletal | Postmarketing | Rhabdomyolysis | 37 |
The most frequently reported adverse events are gastrointestinal disturbances (diarrhea, nausea, vomiting), headache, rash, and local injection site reactions.[1] However, clinicians must be vigilant for the signs of more serious reactions:
The safety profile of meropenem is defined by one absolute contraindication and a comprehensive list of warnings and precautions issued by regulatory agencies.
Meropenem has several clinically significant drug-drug interactions that can alter its efficacy or increase the risk of toxicity. The most critical interactions are those affecting renal excretion and the concurrent use of valproic acid.
Interacting Drug/Class | Interaction Severity | Effect of Interaction | Clinical Recommendation & Source(s) |
---|---|---|---|
Valproic Acid / Divalproex Sodium | Major | Co-administration of meropenem significantly reduces serum concentrations of valproic acid, often to subtherapeutic levels. This can lead to a loss of seizure control and an increased risk of breakthrough seizures. | Concomitant use is generally not recommended. Alternative antibacterial agents should be considered for patients whose seizures are well-controlled on valproic acid. If meropenem use is necessary, supplemental anti-convulsant therapy should be considered and valproic acid levels monitored. 21 |
Probenecid | Major | Probenecid competes with meropenem for active tubular secretion in the kidneys, thereby inhibiting its renal excretion. This results in a prolonged half-life and significantly increased plasma concentrations of meropenem. | Co-administration is not recommended, as it can lead to potentially toxic levels of meropenem and complicates dosing. 18 |
Live Bacterial Vaccines (e.g., Typhoid, Cholera, BCG) | Major | As a potent antibacterial agent, meropenem can inactivate live bacterial vaccines, rendering them ineffective. | Avoid co-administration. Vaccination should be timed appropriately relative to the antibiotic course. 40 |
Anticoagulants (e.g., Warfarin, Acenocoumarol) | Moderate | Meropenem may enhance the anticoagulant effect of these agents, increasing the international normalized ratio (INR) and the risk of bleeding. The exact mechanism is not fully elucidated but may involve disruption of gut flora that synthesize vitamin K. | Monitor coagulation parameters (e.g., INR, PTT) closely during and after co-administration. Dose adjustment of the anticoagulant may be necessary. 8 |
Drugs Affecting Renal Excretion (e.g., NSAIDs) | Moderate | Drugs that decrease renal clearance (e.g., non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs like aceclofenac) can reduce the excretion of meropenem, leading to higher serum levels and an increased risk of toxicity. Conversely, some drugs may increase its excretion. | Use with caution. Monitor for signs of meropenem efficacy and toxicity when co-administered with drugs known to significantly affect renal function or tubular secretion. 8 |
The sustained clinical utility of meropenem, a cornerstone of modern antibacterial therapy, is under profound threat from the global proliferation of antimicrobial resistance (AMR).[5] The emergence and spread of bacteria capable of resisting carbapenems represents one of the most urgent public health crises of our time.
Bacteria have evolved several sophisticated mechanisms to evade the bactericidal action of meropenem. These can be broadly categorized into enzymatic degradation, reduced drug entry, and active drug removal.[19]
The spread of carbapenem-resistant organisms, especially Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), poses a grave threat to patient safety, as it leaves clinicians with very few, and often more toxic, treatment options for severe infections.[6] Addressing this challenge requires a multi-pronged approach.
Meropenem is marketed globally by numerous pharmaceutical companies under a wide variety of brand names, reflecting its status as a foundational antibiotic in hospitals worldwide. While Merrem and Meronem are among the most widely recognized originator brands, a multitude of generic and branded generic versions are available.
Brand Name | Selected Countries/Regions | Manufacturer(s) | Source(s) |
---|---|---|---|
Merrem | USA, Canada, Mexico, Italy | Pfizer, AstraZeneca | 43 |
Meronem | Europe, UK, Asia, Latin America | Pfizer, AstraZeneca | 10 |
Vabomere (combination with Vaborbactam) | USA | Rempex / The Medicines Company | 20 |
Mepem | China, Taiwan | Sumitomo, Dainippon | 15 |
Ronem | Bangladesh, Indonesia, Peru | Opsonin, Fahrenheit, OQ Pharma | 7 |
Penem | Thailand, India | M & H Manufacturing, Sanjivani | 7 |
Maxpenem | Vietnam | JW Pharmaceutical | 44 |
Itanem | Serbia, Bosnia & Herzegovina | Galenika | 44 |
Meropenem Sandoz | Canada, Spain, Switzerland, Poland | Sandoz | 44 |
Meropenem Kabi | Europe, Canada, Australia | Fresenius Kabi | 44 |
DBL Meropenem | Australia, New Zealand | Hospira | 44 |
Aspen Meropenem | South Africa | Pharmacare | 44 |
Painon | China | Haibin Pharmaceutical | 44 |
Merocrit | India | Cipla | 44 |
Biopenem | Argentina | Lafedar | 44 |
This table represents a small selection of the hundreds of brand names available worldwide. For a comprehensive list, resources such as international drug databases should be consulted. Source: [44]
Meropenem stands as a paradigm of modern antibacterial therapy—a powerful, broad-spectrum agent born from the principles of rational drug design to address the clinical and pharmacological limitations of its predecessors. Its development, marked by the strategic addition of a 1-β-methyl group to confer stability against human renal dehydropeptidase-I, solved a key metabolic challenge and established it as a more versatile and pharmacokinetically favorable carbapenem.
The clinical strengths of meropenem are formidable and well-established. Its exceptionally broad spectrum of activity against Gram-positive, Gram-negative (including P. aeruginosa), and anaerobic pathogens, combined with its stability against many common β-lactamases like ESBLs, makes it an indispensable tool for treating complex, polymicrobial, and severe infections. Its ability to penetrate tissues widely, including the cerebrospinal fluid, solidifies its role in managing life-threatening conditions such as intra-abdominal sepsis and bacterial meningitis.
However, these strengths are balanced by significant liabilities. The requirement for intravenous administration limits its use to the inpatient setting. Its safety profile, while often described as favorable in the context of critical illness, includes a risk of serious and potentially fatal adverse events, including anaphylaxis, severe cutaneous reactions, and neurological toxicity. The management of these risks, particularly the prevention of seizures through meticulous dose adjustment in patients with renal impairment, demands a high level of clinical vigilance.
The most profound challenge to the future of meropenem is not its intrinsic pharmacology but the extrinsic and relentless pressure of antimicrobial resistance. The global spread of carbapenemase-producing organisms threatens to render this last-resort antibiotic ineffective, pushing medicine toward a post-antibiotic era for some infections. Meropenem is therefore not merely a drug but a finite and invaluable public health resource. Its preservation is dependent on a concerted global effort encompassing aggressive antibiotic stewardship programs to ensure its judicious use, robust infection control to prevent the spread of resistant pathogens, and continued innovation in the development of novel β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. The ongoing utility of meropenem is a direct reflection of our collective commitment to confronting the crisis of antimicrobial resistance.
Published at: July 23, 2025
This report is continuously updated as new research emerges.
Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.
© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.