Small Molecule
C19H19N3O3
161832-65-1
Talampanel is an investigational small molecule drug that has been the subject of extensive study in neuroscience and oncology. As a synthetic organic compound, its identity is established through a comprehensive set of internationally recognized identifiers, ensuring its unambiguous reference across scientific literature and regulatory databases.
The generic name assigned to the compound is Talampanel, which is also its International Nonproprietary Name (INN), registered under INN number 7820.[1] During its research and development phases, it was known by several codes, most prominently LY300164 and GYKI 53773, reflecting its developmental history with different pharmaceutical entities.[3] Its unique chemical identity is cataloged in major databases under specific accession numbers, including DrugBank ID DB04982, CAS (Chemical Abstracts Service) Registry Number 161832-65-1, and ChEMBL ID CHEMBL61872.[2] Further identifiers such as the FDA UNII code CVS43XG1L5 and PubChem Compound ID 164509 provide additional layers of precise identification for regulatory and research purposes.[3]
Chemically, Talampanel is classified as a synthetic derivative of dioxolo-benzodiazepine, belonging to the 2,3-benzodiazepine class of compounds known for their activity within the central nervous system (CNS).[3] Its formal IUPAC (International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry) name is 1-dioxolo[4,5-h]benzodiazepin-7-yl]ethanone.[1]
The structure of Talampanel is defined by several key representations used in computational and medicinal chemistry:
A critical feature of Talampanel's structure is its stereochemistry. The molecule possesses a single, defined stereocenter at the 8th position of the benzodiazepine ring. The (8R)- designation in its IUPAC name and the @@ notation in its SMILES string specify that Talampanel is a specific enantiomer.[2] This is further confirmed by its negative optical activity ((-)) and the classification of its stereochemistry as "ABSOLUTE".[2] This stereospecificity is not a trivial detail; it is fundamental to the molecule's biological activity. The three-dimensional arrangement of atoms conferred by the (8R) configuration is directly responsible for its potent and selective binding to the allosteric site on its target receptor. Research on related 2,3-benzodiazepines has consistently demonstrated that different stereoisomers can possess vastly different pharmacological properties, making the synthesis of the correct, single enantiomer essential for achieving the desired therapeutic effect and avoiding inactive or potentially detrimental isomers.[5]
The physical and chemical properties of Talampanel are consistent with those of an orally administered, CNS-active drug candidate. These characteristics govern its absorption, distribution, and interaction with biological systems.
The molecular formula of Talampanel is $C_{19}H_{19}N_{3}O_{3}$, corresponding to an average molecular weight of approximately 337.37 g/mol and a monoisotopic mass of 337.142641489 Da.[2] In its solid state, it appears as a white to beige powder.[9] The compound exhibits poor aqueous solubility but is readily soluble in organic solvents like dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), with reported solubilities of 15 mg/mL and up to 100 mM.[9] This lipophilic character is essential for passive diffusion across biological membranes, including the blood-brain barrier. Its optical activity, a key physical constant for this chiral molecule, is measured as $[\alpha]/D$ -280 to -340° (c = 1 in methanol), confirming its identity as a specific, optically pure enantiomer.[9]
Computational models predict that Talampanel possesses favorable "druglike" properties. It adheres to Lipinski's Rule of Five, a set of guidelines used to predict oral bioavailability.[6] Its predicted partition coefficient (logP) is in the range of 1.97 to 2.33, and its polar surface area is 77.15 $Å^2$, properties that are consistent with a molecule capable of efficient CNS penetration.[6] The extensive and consistent characterization of Talampanel across a multitude of public and commercial databases is a testament to the significant investment made in its preclinical and clinical development, leaving a rich digital footprint that remains a valuable resource for research into this class of compounds.[2]
Table 1.1: Comprehensive Identification and Physicochemical Profile of Talampanel
| Property | Value | Source(s) |
|---|---|---|
| Identifiers | ||
| Generic Name | Talampanel | 1 |
| DrugBank ID | DB04982 | 3 |
| CAS Number | 161832-65-1 | 3 |
| Development Codes | LY300164, GYKI 53773 | 3 |
| UNII | CVS43XG1L5 | 3 |
| Chemical Structure | ||
| IUPAC Name | 1-dioxolo[4,5-h]benzodiazepin-7-yl]ethanone | 1 |
| Chemical Class | Dioxolo-benzodiazepine | 3 |
| Stereochemistry | (8R)-, Absolute | 2 |
| Molecular Formula | $C_{19}H_{19}N_{3}O_{3}$ | 2 |
| Physicochemical Properties | ||
| Molecular Weight | 337.37 g/mol (Average) | 2 |
| Physical Form | White to beige powder | 9 |
| Solubility (DMSO) | 15 mg/mL to 100 mM | 9 |
| Optical Activity | $[\alpha]/D$ -280 to -340° (c = 1 in methanol) | 9 |
| Melting Point | 169-172 °C | 12 |
To comprehend the pharmacological action of Talampanel, it is essential to first understand its molecular target within the broader context of CNS neurobiology. The central nervous system relies on a delicate balance between excitatory and inhibitory signaling. The principal mediator of fast excitatory neurotransmission is the amino acid L-glutamate.[6] Its effects are transduced by a family of ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs), which are ligand-gated ion channels. Among these, the α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptor is paramount for mediating the rapid synaptic transmission that underpins most brain functions, including learning and memory via processes like long-term potentiation (LTP).[6]
Pathological conditions can arise when this glutamatergic system becomes overactive. Excessive stimulation of AMPA receptors leads to neuronal hyperexcitability, a state characterized by uncontrolled, synchronous firing of neurons, which is the cellular basis of epileptic seizures.[13] Prolonged or extreme overactivation can trigger a cascade of events known as excitotoxicity, where excessive influx of cations, particularly calcium ($Ca^{2+}$), leads to neuronal damage and death.[16] This excitotoxic mechanism is a key pathological component in a range of neurological disorders, including traumatic brain injury, stroke, and neurodegenerative diseases like amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).[16] Consequently, antagonizing the AMPA receptor presents a compelling therapeutic strategy to mitigate these pathological processes.
Talampanel functions as a potent and selective non-competitive antagonist of the AMPA receptor.[3] This mechanism distinguishes it from competitive antagonists that would vie with glutamate for the same binding site on the receptor. Instead, Talampanel binds to a distinct allosteric site on the AMPA receptor complex.[5] This type of interaction is also described as negative allosteric modulation (NAM).[16]
Upon binding to this allosteric site, Talampanel induces a conformational change in the receptor protein. This structural alteration prevents the receptor's ion channel from opening, even when glutamate is successfully bound to its own recognition site. By locking the channel in a non-conductive state, Talampanel effectively blocks the influx of sodium ($Na^{+}$) and calcium ($Ca^{2+}$) ions that would normally follow glutamate binding, thereby dampening excitatory postsynaptic potentials.[6] This allosteric mechanism provides the molecular basis for its pharmacological effects. Talampanel belongs to the same class of 2,3-benzodiazepine AMPA antagonists as its predecessor, GYKI 52466, over which it demonstrates a 2.3- to 3-fold greater potency.[8]
AMPA receptors are not monolithic entities; they are complex heterotetrameric proteins assembled from a combination of four different subunits: GluA1, GluA2, GluA3, and GluA4. The specific subunit composition of a receptor determines its functional properties, such as ion permeability and desensitization kinetics, and this composition varies across different brain regions and neuronal populations.[6]
While detailed mechanistic studies on Talampanel's subunit interactions are limited, available evidence indicates that it possesses a degree of selectivity, showing a preference for AMPA receptors containing the GluA1 and GluA2 subunits over those with GluA3 and GluA4.[1] This selectivity could have significant therapeutic implications. For instance, the GluA2 subunit is particularly important because its presence renders the AMPA receptor channel impermeable to calcium. Receptors lacking the GluA2 subunit are calcium-permeable and are strongly implicated in the excitotoxic processes that drive neurodegeneration.[16] Talampanel's ability to modulate specific receptor subtypes could, in theory, allow for a more targeted therapeutic effect.
The molecular action of Talampanel as an AMPA receptor antagonist translates into a range of measurable physiological and potentially therapeutic effects.
The clinical manifestations of Talampanel's pharmacology, particularly its adverse event profile, serve as a clear confirmation of its on-target activity. The most frequently reported side effects—dizziness, ataxia (impaired coordination), and somnolence—are not idiosyncratic toxicities but are the predictable physiological consequences of globally dampening fast excitatory neurotransmission.[19] Functions such as maintaining balance (cerebellar activity) and wakefulness (reticular activating system) are highly dependent on intact glutamatergic signaling. By antagonizing AMPA receptors throughout the CNS, Talampanel inevitably impairs these functions. This creates a challenging therapeutic paradox where the desired therapeutic action is intrinsically linked to dose-limiting side effects, resulting in a narrow therapeutic window.
While Talampanel possessed a promising pharmacodynamic profile and a logical mechanism of action, its journey through clinical development was ultimately halted not by a lack of efficacy or safety, but by a fundamentally flawed and impractical pharmacokinetic profile. The analysis of its absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) reveals the critical liabilities that rendered it unsuitable for chronic therapeutic use.
Talampanel's metabolism is highly susceptible to the influence of co-administered medications, a critical issue for patient populations, such as those with epilepsy, who are often treated with multiple drugs simultaneously.
The clinical challenge posed by these opposing interactions was profound. In the Phase II trial for malignant gliomas, investigators were forced to implement three distinct, stratified dosing schedules based entirely on a patient's concomitant AED regimen, creating significant complexity and risk in trial management and patient care.[19]
The combination of an intrinsically short half-life, non-linear pharmacokinetics, and a high susceptibility to significant, opposing drug-drug interactions constituted a "fatal flaw" that ultimately sealed the fate of Talampanel's development program.[4] A drug requiring a complex t.i.d. dosing schedule that must be constantly adjusted based on a patient's other medications is clinically impractical and poses an unacceptable risk of therapeutic failure or adverse events. The subsequent successful development and approval of perampanel, another non-competitive AMPA receptor antagonist with a very long half-life of approximately 105 hours that allows for once-daily dosing, underscores the industry's recognition of Talampanel's critical pharmacokinetic deficiencies.[16] This contrast clearly demonstrates that while the molecular target was valid, the specific drug candidate was not viable. Talampanel serves as a powerful case study illustrating that a promising mechanism of action cannot rescue a molecule with a fundamentally unsuitable ADME profile.
Table 3.1: Key Pharmacokinetic Parameters and Drug Interactions of Talampanel
| Parameter | Value / Effect | Condition / Context | Source(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorption | |||
| Time to Max. Concentration ($T_{max}$) | 1–3 hours | Oral administration | 6 |
| Elimination | |||
| Biological Half-Life ($t_{1/2}$) | ~3.0 hours | Single dose, epilepsy patients | 24 |
| Biological Half-Life ($t_{1/2}$) | ~5.6 hours | Multiple dose, steady-state | 24 |
| General Half-Life Range | 3–6 hours | Various studies | 3 |
| Pharmacokinetic Behavior | |||
| Linearity | Non-linear | Multiple-dose administration | 24 |
| Drug-Drug Interactions | |||
| Effect of EIAEDs | ~50% lower plasma concentration | Concomitant use of enzyme-inducing AEDs | 24 |
| Effect of Valproic Acid (VPA) | Inhibited metabolism (higher concentration) | Concomitant use of VPA | 24 |
| Clinical Consequence | |||
| Required Dosing Frequency | Three times daily (t.i.d.) | To maintain therapeutic levels | 4 |
The clinical development program for Talampanel was ambitious, exploring its potential across a range of severe neurological and neuro-oncological conditions. The results of these trials, however, painted a starkly contrasting picture: while the drug showed proof-of-concept efficacy in treating the symptoms of epilepsy, it failed to modify the course of more complex, multifactorial diseases like ALS and malignant glioma.
The most direct application of Talampanel's mechanism of action was as an anticonvulsant. Its ability to dampen neuronal hyperexcitability provided a strong rationale for its investigation in patients with epilepsy.
A key study was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial involving 49 patients with refractory partial seizures—a population notoriously difficult to treat.[25] The trial was successful, demonstrating a statistically significant treatment effect in favor of Talampanel ($p = 0.001$). Patients experienced a median seizure reduction of 21%, a clinically meaningful outcome in this population. Importantly, 80% of patients had fewer seizures while receiving Talampanel compared to when they were on placebo.[25] This result provided clear clinical proof-of-concept, confirming that Talampanel was pharmacologically active in humans and effective for its primary intended use.[4] Despite this demonstrated efficacy, its development for epilepsy was ultimately abandoned due to the insurmountable challenges posed by its pharmacokinetic profile.
The investigation of Talampanel in ALS was based on the well-established glutamate excitotoxicity hypothesis, which posits that excessive glutamatergic stimulation contributes to the progressive death of motor neurons that characterizes the disease.[16] The therapeutic goal was not merely symptomatic relief but neuroprotection and disease modification.
A large, multicenter Phase II clinical trial (NCT00696332) was conducted to test this hypothesis. The study was a nine-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that ultimately enrolled hundreds of patients.[29] The results were definitive and disappointing: the trial failed to meet its primary endpoint, which was a reduction in the rate of disease-related functional deterioration.[4]
While some post-hoc analyses of an earlier, smaller cohort suggested non-statistically significant trends toward a 15% slower decline in muscle strength and a 30% slower decline in the ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS) score, these findings were not robust and did not hold up in the larger study.[29] The sponsor, Teva Pharmaceuticals, officially announced the negative trial results in May 2010, confirming the lack of efficacy.[30] This outcome highlighted a significant disconnect with preclinical data from SOD1 mutant mouse models of ALS. In these models, Talampanel was only effective at reducing elevated intracellular calcium in motor neurons when treatment was initiated presymptomatically; it failed to rescue neurons once symptoms had appeared, a finding that may help explain its failure in a clinical population with established disease.[16]
The rationale for using Talampanel in malignant gliomas, particularly glioblastoma (GBM), was based on the novel discovery that glioma cells exist in a symbiotic relationship with the glutamatergic system. These tumor cells not only express functional AMPA receptors but also release glutamate into the extracellular space, creating an autocrine/paracrine feedback loop that promotes tumor cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, while also causing excitotoxicity in surrounding healthy brain tissue.[3]
A Phase II trial (NCT00064363) was conducted in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas (GBM and anaplastic glioma).[35] The study was terminated early due to futility.[19] Talampanel demonstrated no significant activity as a single agent in this unselected patient population. The 6-month progression-free survival (PFS6), the primary endpoint, was a dismal 4.6% for GBM patients and 0% for patients with anaplastic gliomas. Median overall survival for GBM patients was only 13 weeks.[19] A separate Phase II trial (NCT00267592) evaluated Talampanel in combination with standard-of-care radiation and temozolomide (TMZ) for newly diagnosed GBM.[38] While one report suggested a potential survival advantage with this combination, these findings were not confirmed in subsequent analyses and did not lead to further development.[39]
Talampanel was also investigated in Phase II trials for Parkinson's disease (NCT00108667, NCT00004576).[41] The rationale was twofold: to modulate parkinsonian motor symptoms and, more specifically, to treat levodopa-induced dyskinesias (LIDs), a common and debilitating side effect of long-term dopamine replacement therapy. Preclinical studies in primate models of Parkinson's were promising, showing that Talampanel could reduce LIDs by 40% and potentiate the antiparkinsonian effects of levodopa.[3] However, the detailed outcomes of the human clinical trials are not available in the public record, and development for this indication did not proceed.
The pattern of clinical results across these indications is revealing. Talampanel proved effective in treating a condition defined by a primary channelopathy and neuronal hyperexcitability (epilepsy). However, it failed when deployed against complex diseases like ALS and glioma. While these conditions have an excitotoxicity component, they are also driven by a host of other powerful pathological pathways, such as protein aggregation and inflammation in ALS, or complex oncogenic signaling cascades in glioma. This suggests that targeting a single pathway, while sufficient for symptomatic control in some disorders, is often insufficient to alter the overall trajectory of a multifactorial disease.
Table 4.1: Comparative Summary of Major Talampanel Clinical Trials
| Indication | Phase | Trial Identifier | Study Design | Primary Endpoint | Key Efficacy Outcome | Status / Conclusion | Source(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Epilepsy | II | N/A | Double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover | Seizure frequency reduction | Positive: 21% median seizure reduction ($p=0.001$) | Efficacy demonstrated, but development halted due to PK | 25 |
| Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) | II | NCT00696332 | Double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group | Rate of decline in arm strength / ALSFRS-R slope | Negative: Failed to meet primary endpoint | No significant clinical benefit; development terminated | 29 |
| Malignant Glioma (Recurrent) | II | NCT00064363 | Open-label, single-arm, stratified | 6-month Progression-Free Survival (PFS6) | Negative: PFS6 was 4.6% (GBM) and 0% (AG) | No single-agent activity; terminated early for futility | 19 |
| Malignant Glioma (Newly Diagnosed) | II | NCT00267592 | Open-label, single-arm | Overall survival | Unconfirmed reports of survival advantage with RT/TMZ | Did not proceed to Phase III; unconfirmed benefit | 38 |
| Parkinson's Disease | II | NCT00108667, NCT00004576 | N/A | N/A | Clinical outcomes not publicly detailed | Completed but did not advance | 3 |
A comprehensive evaluation of the safety and tolerability data from Talampanel's clinical development program reveals a consistent and predictable profile. Crucially, the evidence indicates that while the drug was associated with notable side effects, it was generally considered safe and well-tolerated, and its discontinuation was not driven by safety concerns.
Across its various clinical trials in epilepsy, ALS, and malignant glioma, Talampanel was consistently described by investigators as being well-tolerated.[3] No unexpected, severe, or life-threatening adverse events emerged that would have constituted a primary safety signal sufficient to halt its development independently.[20] This conclusion was explicitly affirmed by the sponsor following the large Phase II trial in ALS, where a press release stated that although the drug failed on efficacy, "safety was established".[30]
The adverse event profile of Talampanel was dominated by effects on the central nervous system, which were highly consistent across different patient populations and studies. These effects are direct, on-target consequences of its pharmacological mechanism as a global AMPA receptor antagonist.
A key observation was that these adverse events tended to occur at lower doses in patient populations compared to healthy volunteers.[3] This is likely attributable to the additive CNS-depressant effects of concomitant medications, particularly other antiepileptic drugs that were common in the study populations.[20]
While the CNS-related side effects were common, they were generally reported as being mild to moderate in severity and were reversible upon dose reduction or discontinuation.[19] Although dose reductions were occasionally necessary to manage these effects, discontinuations due to drug toxicity were not a primary issue.[19] In the nine-month ALS trial, the rate of patient discontinuation from the study was similar in the Talampanel group (25%) and the placebo group (16%), indicating that the drug's side effects were not a major driver of patient dropout over the long term.[29]
The safety profile of Talampanel, while not benign, was ultimately manageable and predictable. Its tolerability provided crucial information that helped to de-risk the entire class of AMPA receptor antagonists. The clinical experience with Talampanel demonstrated that targeting AMPA receptors was a viable and fundamentally safe strategy in humans, provided the drug candidate possessed a suitable pharmacokinetic profile. This knowledge likely provided confidence for the continued investment in and development of follow-on compounds like perampanel, which retained the validated mechanism and now-understood safety profile while overcoming the pharmacokinetic liabilities. In this way, Talampanel's development, even in failure, served as an essential stepping stone that contributed to the eventual success of a new class of antiepileptic drugs.
The regulatory trajectory of Talampanel reflects the arc of its clinical development, from the initial promise that garnered special designations to the ultimate discontinuation following disappointing clinical trial results. Its history serves as a clear example of how regulatory status is directly tied to the evolving scientific and clinical evidence for a drug candidate.
In recognition of its potential to treat rare, serious, and life-threatening diseases with unmet medical needs, Talampanel was granted orphan drug designation by regulatory authorities in both the United States and Europe. This status is designed to incentivize the development of drugs for rare conditions by providing benefits such as tax credits, fee exemptions, and a period of market exclusivity following approval.[42]
These designations represented a regulatory belief in the plausible therapeutic potential of the drug and provided its sponsor with significant incentives to pursue its difficult and costly clinical development.
Ultimately, as clinical trial data accumulated and failed to demonstrate the required efficacy, the rationale for continued development and the associated orphan designations eroded. Consequently, the sponsor voluntarily withdrew all of Talampanel's orphan designations.
The timeline of these withdrawals is a direct administrative reflection of the scientific outcomes. The glioma trial was terminated for futility, and the large ALS trial failed to meet its primary endpoint. As it became clear that Talampanel would not reach the market for these indications, maintaining the now-moot regulatory designations was no longer logical for the sponsor.
The final confirmation of its status came in May 2010, following the public announcement of the negative ALS trial results. It was officially stated that Talampanel is not currently under development.[4] Its journey from a promising preclinical compound to a multi-indication clinical candidate concluded at the investigational stage, without ever being submitted for marketing approval.
Talampanel (DB04982) represents a significant and instructive case study in modern neuropharmacology and drug development. As a potent, selective, and stereospecific non-competitive antagonist of the AMPA receptor, it was founded on a strong and compelling scientific rationale for treating a range of CNS disorders characterized by neuronal hyperexcitability and excitotoxicity.
Its clinical development program validated this rationale in part. In a trial for refractory partial seizures, Talampanel demonstrated clear, statistically significant efficacy, providing human proof-of-concept that antagonizing AMPA receptors is an effective anticonvulsant strategy. Furthermore, its safety profile, though marked by predictable on-target CNS effects such as dizziness and ataxia, was deemed manageable and did not present an independent barrier to its advancement.
However, the promise of its pharmacodynamic profile was completely undermined by a critically flawed pharmacokinetic profile. An exceptionally short biological half-life necessitated an impractical thrice-daily dosing regimen, while its high susceptibility to complex and opposing drug-drug interactions with other common antiepileptic drugs made consistent and safe dosing a formidable clinical challenge. These ADME liabilities were the primary, explicitly cited reasons for the discontinuation of its development. When tested in more complex, multifactorial diseases such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and malignant glioma, Talampanel failed to demonstrate any meaningful clinical benefit, highlighting the limitations of targeting a single pathway in diseases driven by a redundant network of pathologies.
The legacy of Talampanel is therefore twofold. On one hand, it is a story of failure—a molecule that could not overcome its inherent chemical liabilities to become a viable therapeutic. On the other hand, its development was not without value. It successfully validated the AMPA receptor as a therapeutic target, characterized the on-target safety profile for this class of drugs in humans, and provided an unequivocal lesson on the primacy of pharmacokinetics in drug design. The comprehensive public data generated from its extensive investigation has served as an invaluable resource, informing the successful development of the next generation of AMPA antagonists, such as the approved drug perampanel. In this sense, the failure of Talampanel was a critical and necessary step forward, contributing substantially to the collective scientific knowledge that ultimately led to a new class of medicines for patients with epilepsy.
Published at: October 19, 2025
This report is continuously updated as new research emerges.
Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.
© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.