MedPath

Eli Lilly's Lutetium Zadavotide Guraxetan Shows Promise in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

• Eli Lilly's 177Lu-PNT2002 demonstrated efficacy in chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC patients progressing on ARPIs, with a median rPFS of 9.5 months, compared to 6 months for ARPIs. • The overall survival analysis showed a hazard ratio of 1.14, but adjusted for crossover, the HR was reduced to 0.68, suggesting a potential survival benefit. • 177Lu-PNT2002 offers a more patient-friendly dosing schedule compared to Novartis' Pluvicto, with lower dosage, longer intervals, and fewer cycles. • Despite negative OS results, the FDA may view 177Lu-PNT2002 favorably due to the high crossover rate, similar to Pluvicto's approval circumstances.

Eli Lilly's lutetium zadavotide guraxetan (177Lu-PNT2002) has shown promising results in the Phase III SPLASH trial for patients with chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who have progressed on one line of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs). The data, presented at the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) Congress 2024, compared 177Lu-PNT2002 to ARPIs like Astellas’ Xtandi (enzalutamide) or Janssen’s Zytiga (abiraterone acetate).

Mechanism of Action and Trial Design

177Lu-PNT2002 comprises a ligand that binds to prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) on prostate cancer cells, facilitating drug internalization, and a radioisotope emitting radiation to destroy nearby cancerous cells. The SPLASH trial's primary endpoint was radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS). The trial design addressed a critical need for effective treatments in mCRPC patients who have progressed on initial ARPI therapy.

Efficacy and Survival Analysis

The first interim analysis of the SPLASH trial revealed that 177Lu-PNT2002 achieved a median rPFS of 9.5 months (95% CI: 7.4, 10.0), while the ARPI arm had a median rPFS of 6 months (95% CI: 4.7, 7.9), with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.55, 0.92, p = 0.0088). However, the overall survival (OS) analysis initially showed a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.14 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54, 2.53), favoring the control arm. This was largely influenced by a high crossover rate (84.6%) from the control arm to the 177Lu-PNT2002 arm. After adjusting for crossover, the HR for OS was reduced to 0.68 (95% CI: 0.44, 1.04), suggesting a potential survival benefit.

Regulatory and Market Landscape

Despite the initial negative OS result, the FDA might view 177Lu-PNT2002 favorably, considering the high crossover rate, similar to the approval of Novartis’ Pluvicto (lutetium vipivotide tetraxetan) based on the VISION trial. GlobalData’s analyst consensus forecast projects 177Lu-PNT2002 sales reaching $1.7 billion by 2030, while Pluvicto is expected to reach $4.3 billion in the same period. Eli Lilly aims to compete with Pluvicto, which is already undergoing label expansion trials, such as the Phase II UpFrontPSMA trial in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC).

Dosing and Administration Advantages

177Lu-PNT2002 presents a more convenient dosing schedule compared to Pluvicto, involving a lower dosage (6.8 GBq versus 7.4 GBq), longer intervals between cycles (eight weeks versus six weeks), and fewer cycles (four cycles versus six). This patient-friendly regimen could influence treatment preferences among physicians and patients.
Subscribe Icon

Stay Updated with Our Daily Newsletter

Get the latest pharmaceutical insights, research highlights, and industry updates delivered to your inbox every day.

Related Topics

Reference News

[1]
ESMO 2024: Eli Lilly brings the competition to Novartis with new results in mCRPC
clinicaltrialsarena.com · Sep 17, 2024

Eli Lilly’s 177Lu-PNT2002, compared to ARPIs like Xtandi and Zytiga, showed efficacy in mCRPC patients positive for PSMA...

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath