MedPath

AbbVie Terminates Rova-T Development After $5.8B Stemcentrx Deal Becomes Major R&D Setback

• AbbVie's $5.8 billion acquisition of Stemcentrx and its lead candidate Rova-T has ended in failure, with the company terminating the drug's development after multiple late-stage trial disappointments.

• The antibody-drug conjugate Rova-T showed promising early results in small cell lung cancer, but failed to demonstrate survival benefits in three crucial clinical trials - TRINITY, TAHOE, and MERU.

• This represents one of pharma's largest R&D setbacks, resulting in a $4 billion impairment charge for AbbVie as it seeks to diversify beyond Humira with other pipeline assets.

In a dramatic conclusion to one of pharma's most expensive R&D gambles, AbbVie has announced the complete termination of its Rova-T (rovalpituzumab tesirine) development program following multiple clinical trial failures. The decision marks the end of what began as a $5.8 billion acquisition of Stemcentrx in 2016, with potential milestone payments pushing the total deal value to nearly $10 billion.

The Rise and Fall of a Promising Cancer Drug

Rova-T emerged as an antibody-drug conjugate targeting DLL3-expressing tumor cells in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). The drug's mechanism appeared compelling - combining an antibody designed to lock onto DLL3 proteins expressed on cancer cells with a tesirine payload intended to destroy these cells while sparing healthy tissue.
Early clinical data generated significant excitement, with phase 1 results showing a 44% response rate in patients with high DLL3 expression. These promising results, coupled with AbbVie's urgent need to diversify beyond its blockbuster Humira (adalimumab), drove the company's aggressive acquisition strategy.

Series of Clinical Setbacks

The program's downward spiral began in March 2018 when the phase 2 TRINITY trial delivered disappointing results. The study showed only a 16% overall response rate in third-line SCLC patients, despite selecting for high DLL3 expression. This initial setback forced AbbVie to abandon plans for accelerated approval.
More serious concerns emerged in December 2018 when the TAHOE trial in second-line SCLC was halted. Not only did Rova-T fail to improve overall survival compared to standard chemotherapy, but patients in the Rova-T arm showed shorter survival times. These results prompted questions about potential issues with the tesirine component and led to a $4 billion impairment charge.
The final blow came from the MERU trial investigating Rova-T as first-line maintenance therapy. A planned interim analysis revealed no benefit compared to placebo, leading AbbVie to terminate the entire development program.

Strategic Implications and Industry Lessons

This outcome represents one of the most costly R&D failures in pharmaceutical history. The case highlights several crucial lessons for drug development and corporate strategy:
  • Early-phase data, while promising, requires careful interpretation
  • Large upfront acquisitions carry substantial risks compared to staged licensing deals
  • The pressure to replace aging blockbusters can drive aggressive deal-making

Looking Beyond Rova-T

Despite this significant setback, AbbVie maintains a diverse pipeline of potential new drugs. The recent approval of Rinvoq (upadacitinib) for rheumatoid arthritis, with projected annual sales of $2 billion by 2024, represents a positive step forward. The company continues to focus on building a portfolio of new assets as it prepares for Humira's patent expiration and biosimilar competition in 2023.
Subscribe Icon

Stay Updated with Our Daily Newsletter

Get the latest pharmaceutical insights, research highlights, and industry updates delivered to your inbox every day.

Related Topics

Reference News

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath