MedPath

EMA Confirms Negative Stance on Masitinib for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

• The EMA has upheld its negative opinion on granting conditional marketing authorization for masitinib as an add-on treatment for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). • The decision follows a re-examination request by AB Science after an initial rejection, with concerns raised about data analysis. • AB Science will focus on a confirmatory Phase 3 program for masitinib in ALS to pursue full approval, while halting reconsideration in Canada.

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has confirmed its negative opinion regarding the conditional marketing authorization of masitinib for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) in the European Union. This decision, made by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP), follows AB Science's request for a re-examination of the initial negative opinion issued in June 2024.

Details of the Decision

AB Science sought re-examination based on data from the AB10015 Phase 2/3 clinical study (NCT02588677), which evaluated masitinib in combination with Rilutek (riluzole) in 394 adults with ALS. The primary endpoint was to assess whether masitinib could slow disease progression, measured by the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R).
Alain Moussy, CEO and co-founder of AB Science, expressed gratitude to patients and physicians who supported the re-examination process. "We did all these efforts for the patients. We are convinced that masitinib is a promising drug when we see patients from the study surviving with the drugs for more than 10 years in our compassionate use program," Moussy stated.

Concerns and Analysis

The application was primarily supported by data from a subgroup of patients with normal-progressing disease (defined as a monthly decline in ALSFRS-R score of less than 1.1 points). In this group, the 4.5 mg/kg dose of masitinib showed a 27% slower disease progression compared to placebo. However, the CHMP raised concerns regarding the analysis of this subgroup and another subgroup of mild to moderate ALS patients, where greater benefits were observed.
A Scientific Advisory Group for Neurology (SAG-N) reviewed the data and agreed that the 1.1 points per month ALSFRS-R decline cutoff was acceptable for distinguishing between normal and fast progressors, provided it was pre-specified before the trial began. This supports the design of the ongoing AB19001 Phase 3 clinical trial (NCT03127267), which uses the same cutoff.

Next Steps for AB Science

AB Science has decided not to pursue reconsideration in Canada after Health Canada classified key analyses as new data, which is not permitted during the reconsideration process. Instead, the company will focus on a confirmatory Phase 3 program to seek full approval for masitinib in ALS.
"Now AB Science objective is to focus on the confirmatory phase 3 program of masitinib in ALS to reach full approval," said Moussy.
Subscribe Icon

Stay Updated with Our Daily Newsletter

Get the latest pharmaceutical insights, research highlights, and industry updates delivered to your inbox every day.

Related Topics

Reference News

[1]
AB Science provides an update on the application for conditional marketing authorisation of ...
globenewswire.com · Oct 17, 2024

EMA confirms negative opinion on conditional marketing authorization for masitinib in ALS treatment, despite AB Science'...

[2]
AB Science Faces Setback in EMA Approval for ALS Treatment - WebDisclosure
webdisclosure.com · Oct 17, 2024

EMA maintains negative stance on masitinib for ALS, prompting AB Science to focus on phase 3 program for full approval.

[3]
EMA's CHMP upholds its negative opinion on masitinib for ALS - ALS News Today
alsnewstoday.com · Oct 22, 2024

EMA's CHMP upheld its negative opinion on AB Science's masitinib for ALS, despite reexamination request. AB Science's CE...

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath