MedPath

Trials Needed to Optimize Checkpoint Inhibitor Sequencing in Bladder Cancer

• The optimal strategy for rechallenging patients with checkpoint inhibitors after prior use in localized bladder cancer remains unclear, necessitating further clinical trials. • Sequencing challenges persist, particularly regarding therapies following pembrolizumab plus enfortumab vedotin and the integration of erdafitinib in patients with FGFR alterations. • Emerging research highlights the importance of germline mutation testing in urothelial carcinoma, benefiting both patients and their families through cancer prevention screening. • Data from kidney cancer trials suggest limited benefit from checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge, but dedicated bladder cancer trials are needed to confirm these findings.

The evolving landscape of bladder cancer treatment, marked by an increasing array of therapeutic options, has created a pressing need for clinical trials to address key unanswered questions, particularly concerning the sequencing of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Petros Grivas, MD, PhD, of the University of Washington Medicine and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, emphasized the necessity of trials to determine the optimal strategies for utilizing these agents.

The Checkpoint Inhibitor Rechallenge Question

A critical area of uncertainty revolves around rechallenging patients with checkpoint inhibitors like nivolumab and pembrolizumab after they have previously received these drugs in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting. The question is whether these agents can be effectively used again upon metastatic recurrence. Data from kidney cancer trials, specifically CONTACT-03 (NCT04338269) and TiNivo-2 (NCT04987203), suggest that rechallenging with checkpoint inhibitors after prior exposure may not provide significant benefit. However, Dr. Grivas noted the importance of conducting dedicated trials in bladder cancer to validate these findings in the urothelial carcinoma setting.

Sequencing Challenges with Novel Therapies

Beyond the rechallenge question, other sequencing dilemmas are emerging. One such challenge involves determining the appropriate treatment course following pembrolizumab in combination with enfortumab vedotin. Additionally, the optimal sequencing of therapies involving erdafitinib, particularly in patients harboring FGFR alterations, requires further investigation.

The Role of Germline Mutation Testing

Furthermore, research into driver mutations in bladder cancer has underscored the significance of germline mutation testing. This testing, coupled with genetic counseling, can identify patients and families who may benefit from cancer prevention screening and early detection efforts. The identification of germline mutations can have implications not only for the patient but also for their broader family, enabling proactive measures to mitigate cancer risk.
"I think this is really showing the interest that bladder cancer as a disease has attracted over the last decade. With more therapy options for our patients, there are many unanswered questions, and that's why we need clinical trials to answer those questions," said Dr. Grivas. He also noted the importance of next-generation sequencing in determining the optimal sequencing of therapies.
Subscribe Icon

Stay Updated with Our Daily Newsletter

Get the latest pharmaceutical insights, research highlights, and industry updates delivered to your inbox every day.

Related Topics

Reference News

[1]
Trials Needed for Sequencing Checkpoint Inhibitors in Bladder Cancer - Targeted Oncology
targetedonc.com · Nov 22, 2024

Petros Grivas discusses unanswered questions on bladder cancer treatment, including rechallenging patients with checkpoi...

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath