MedPath

Analysis of Clinical Trials for Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion Reveals Research Gaps

• A review of 138 clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov highlights the landscape of research into recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA). • The majority of trials focus on intervention strategies, particularly drug interventions like anticoagulants, for unexplained RSA (URSA). • Asia leads in the number of RSA clinical trials, followed by Europe and Africa, indicating a global interest in addressing this reproductive challenge. • The study suggests current research efforts may be inadequate, pointing to the need for more diverse and effective prevention and treatment strategies.

A systematic review of clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov reveals significant gaps in research and intervention strategies for recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA). The analysis, encompassing 138 trials, highlights a concentration on drug interventions, particularly anticoagulants, for unexplained RSA (URSA), suggesting a need for more diverse approaches.

Trial Characteristics

The study, published in Frontiers in Endocrinology, examined trials registered up to March 2, 2024. Of the 138 trials identified, 72 (52.17%) were classified as intervention trials, while 66 (47.83%) were observational. A significant portion (48.55%) of the studies enrolled 100 or fewer participants, and the majority focused exclusively on female participants. Geographically, Asia hosted the highest number of trials (46, 33.33%), followed by Europe (36, 26.09%), Africa (29, 21.01%), and America (13, 9.42%).

Focus on Unexplained RSA and Drug Interventions

The analysis indicated that 61 trials (44.20%) specifically targeted individuals with URSA. Among intervention types, drug interventions were predominant (49, 62.82%), with a notable increase in behavioral intervention trials also observed. The emphasis on drug interventions, particularly anticoagulants, suggests a prevailing hypothesis regarding the role of coagulation disorders in RSA, but also highlights a potential lack of exploration into other potential etiologies and therapeutic strategies.

Implications for Future Research

The authors suggest that current research efforts in RSA are insufficient for advancing prevention and treatment strategies. The concentration on URSA and drug interventions, particularly anticoagulants, may overlook other contributing factors and potential therapeutic avenues. The review underscores the need for more comprehensive and diversified research approaches to address the complex challenges of RSA. Further research should explore a broader range of interventions and consider the diverse underlying causes of RSA to improve outcomes for affected women.
Subscribe Icon

Stay Updated with Our Daily Newsletter

Get the latest pharmaceutical insights, research highlights, and industry updates delivered to your inbox every day.

Related Topics

Reference News

[1]
The Landscape of Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion Registered on Clinical Trials.gov
frontiersin.org · Dec 3, 2024

A systematic review of recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov identified 138 trials,...

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath