MedPath

New Clinical Trials to Evaluate Advanced CVAD Securement Methods in Pediatric Patients

  • Three pioneering pilot randomized controlled trials (CASCADE Junior) launched to evaluate effectiveness of various central venous access device securement methods in pediatric patients.

  • Study compares innovative technologies including tissue adhesive, integrated securement dressings, and sutureless securement devices against conventional methods for different CVAD types.

  • Research aims to reduce the 25% failure rate of pediatric CVADs and prevent serious complications including catheter-associated bloodstream infections, which carry up to 35% mortality risk.

A series of groundbreaking clinical trials is underway to evaluate novel methods for securing central venous access devices (CVADs) in pediatric patients, addressing a critical need in pediatric care where device failure affects one in four patients.
The Central venous Access device SeCurement And Dressing Effectiveness (CASCADE Junior) trials, conducted at major Australian pediatric hospitals, will assess multiple innovative technologies against current standard practices across three different types of CVADs: peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs), non-tunneled CVADs, and tunneled CVADs.

Critical Need in Pediatric Care

Currently, approximately 25% of pediatric CVADs fail before treatment completion, leading to serious complications including catheter-associated bloodstream infections (CABSI), which carry a mortality rate as high as 35%. These failures often necessitate device replacement, exposing vulnerable young patients to additional procedural risks.

Novel Technologies Under Evaluation

The trials will evaluate several promising alternatives to traditional suture-based securement:
  • Tissue adhesive (medical-grade "superglue"): Shows potential to reduce dislodgement from 12% to 4% while providing bactericidal properties against Gram-positive organisms
  • Integrated securement dressings: Feature enhanced adhesive borders and absorbent layers to manage wound moisture
  • Sutureless securement devices: Utilize adhesive padded footplates with specialized catheter-locking mechanisms

Study Design and Implementation

The research encompasses three separate pilot randomized controlled trials, collectively aiming to recruit:
  • 100 participants for PICC evaluation
  • 180 participants for non-tunneled CVAD assessment
  • 48 participants for tunneled CVAD study

Outcome Measures

Primary feasibility metrics include:
  • Patient eligibility (target: ≥70% of screened patients)
  • Recruitment success (target: ≥70% enrollment of eligible patients)
  • Protocol adherence (target: ≥80%)
  • Patient retention (target: <15% loss to follow-up)
Secondary outcomes focus on:
  • CVAD failure rates
  • Complication incidence
  • Cost-effectiveness
  • Patient and healthcare provider satisfaction
  • Safety parameters including skin complications

Clinical Implications

This comprehensive evaluation of CVAD securement methods represents a crucial step toward establishing evidence-based standards for pediatric central line care. The findings could significantly impact clinical practice by identifying more effective ways to prevent device failure and associated complications, potentially reducing healthcare costs and improving patient outcomes.
The research team will employ standardized insertion protocols and extensive staff education to ensure consistency across all trial arms. Independent, blinded specialists will assess key outcomes such as bloodstream infections and venous thrombosis, maintaining scientific rigor throughout the study.
Subscribe Icon

Stay Updated with Our Daily Newsletter

Get the latest pharmaceutical insights, research highlights, and industry updates delivered to your inbox every day.

Related Topics

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath