MedPath

Brolucizumab Shows Non-Inferior Visual Acuity and Superior Anatomic Outcomes Compared to Aflibercept in DME

• A recent meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials compared brolucizumab to aflibercept for treating diabetic macular edema (DME). • Brolucizumab was found to be non-inferior to aflibercept in terms of best-corrected visual acuity from baseline. • The study showed brolucizumab significantly improved anatomic parameters, specifically the change in central subfield thickness, compared to aflibercept. • No statistically significant differences in ocular adverse events were observed between the two anti-VEGF therapies.

A meta-analysis comparing brolucizumab (Beovu, Novartis) and aflibercept (Eylea, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals) in treating diabetic macular edema (DME) reveals that brolucizumab is non-inferior in functional outcomes and superior in anatomic parameters. The study, led by Leonardo B. Justino from the Federal University of Santa Catarina, highlights the potential of brolucizumab as an alternative treatment for DME, addressing the need for therapies with longer durations between clinical visits and improved patient outcomes.

Addressing Treatment Burden in DME

Current anti-VEGF treatments for DME often present a high treatment burden, leading to poor adherence. Socioeconomic constraints, the cost and frequency of injections, and patient perceptions regarding the severity of DME all contribute to this challenge. The meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab compared to aflibercept, seeking a therapy that reduces the burden while maintaining effectiveness.

Study Design and Methods

The meta-analysis included data from 1,253 patients (1,253 eyes) across three randomized controlled trials, with 57% treated with brolucizumab and 43% with aflibercept. The study searched Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PubMed databases up to February 16, 2024. The mean follow-up times ranged from 52 to 100 weeks.

Key Findings: Visual Acuity and Anatomic Improvements

The results indicated that brolucizumab was non-inferior to aflibercept in terms of the mean change in best-corrected visual acuity from baseline (least squares mean difference [LSMD] 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI] −1.37 to 1.95; p = 0.73). Importantly, the change in central subfield thickness was significantly greater in the brolucizumab group compared to the aflibercept group (LSMD −24.5 μm; 95% CI −48.2 to −0.7 μm; p < 0.05).

Safety Profile

The meta-analysis found no statistically significant differences in the incidence rates of adverse events between the two drugs, including retinal vasculitis or retinal vascular occlusions. This is a notable finding, as previous studies had raised concerns about intraocular inflammation associated with brolucizumab.

Mechanism of Action and Dosing

Brolucizumab is a single-chain variable fragment with a high binding affinity for VEGF-A isoforms. Its low molecular weight (26 kDa) allows for a molar dosing delivery 11 times higher than aflibercept. This unique characteristic potentially contributes to its efficacy in improving anatomic outcomes.

Implications for DME Treatment

The study concludes that brolucizumab significantly improves anatomic parameters in patients with DME while maintaining non-inferiority in functional outcomes compared to aflibercept. The authors emphasize the need for further randomized controlled trials powered to assess safety outcomes to solidify brolucizumab's role as an alternative treatment for DME.
Subscribe Icon

Stay Updated with Our Daily Newsletter

Get the latest pharmaceutical insights, research highlights, and industry updates delivered to your inbox every day.

Related Topics

Reference News

[1]
Comparison of brolucizumab and aflibercept for treating DME - Modern Retina
modernretina.com · Dec 22, 2024

A study found brolucizumab non-inferior to aflibercept in treating DME, with superior anatomic outcomes. Both drugs show...

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath