MedPath

Phase II Trial of Niraparib-Dostarlimab Combination Fails to Meet Primary Endpoint in Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer

16 days ago2 min read
Share

Key Insights

  • A phase II trial evaluating niraparib and dostarlimab combination therapy in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma was terminated early for futility after achieving only 20% clinical benefit versus the target of 50%.

  • The study enrolled 10 patients with a median age of 62.5, achieving a 10% overall response rate with median progression-free survival of 3.8 months and overall survival of 10.1 months.

  • Nine of the ten patients had previously failed anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, highlighting the challenge of treating this patient population with poor prognosis.

A phase II clinical trial evaluating the combination of niraparib and dostarlimab in patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) was terminated early after failing to meet its primary efficacy endpoint. The single-arm, open-label study achieved only 20% clinical benefit, falling short of the target 50% threshold required for continuation.

Trial Design and Patient Population

The study employed Simon's two-step minimax design, initially planning to enroll 14 patients in the first stage. However, only 10 patients were enrolled before early termination. The patient population consisted primarily of White males with a median age of 62.5 years, representing a challenging treatment scenario as nine patients had previously failed anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy.
Patients received niraparib and dostarlimab until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. The primary endpoint focused on overall response rate and clinical benefit as assessed by RECIST version 1.1 criteria.

Limited Efficacy Results

The combination therapy demonstrated modest activity with a best overall response rate of 10% and clinical benefit rate of 20%, consisting of one partial response and one stable disease. At a median follow-up of 10.13 months, the median progression-free survival reached 3.8 months, while median overall survival was 10.1 months.
One patient presented with particularly notable biomarkers, including a PD-L1 combined positive score greater than 20, high tumor mutational burden, a BRCA1 rearrangement, and an ATRX splice site mutation, suggesting potential for biomarker-driven patient selection.

Safety Profile

The most common grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events were thrombocytopenia and hypertension. The safety profile appeared manageable, with no unexpected toxicities reported from the combination approach.

Scientific Rationale and Future Directions

The study was based on the understanding that DNA pathway repair mutations in HNSCC are associated with higher tumor mutational burden rates and immune checkpoint inhibitor response. PARP inhibitors induce single-strand DNA breaks and demonstrate efficacy in cancers with DNA repair defects through synthetic lethality mechanisms.
Additionally, PARP inhibitors inhibit glycogen synthase kinase-3β activity, leading to upregulated PD-L1 expression, which can be counteracted by PD-1 inhibitors. This biological rationale supported combining niraparib with dostarlimab, an anti-PD-L1 antibody.
Despite the trial's early termination for futility, researchers noted that activity may be improved with biomarker-driven treatment selection in carefully chosen patients. The poor prognosis of patients with R/M HNSCC who progress on PD-1 inhibitors underscores the continued need for novel therapeutic approaches in this challenging patient population.
Subscribe Icon

Stay Updated with Our Daily Newsletter

Get the latest pharmaceutical insights, research highlights, and industry updates delivered to your inbox every day.

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath