Background
Targeted temperature management (TTM) post-cardiac arrest is crucial for improving survival and neurological outcomes. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of internal versus external cooling methods in achieving these outcomes.
Methodology
Conducted from October 2008 to September 2014, the study randomized post-resuscitation cardiac arrest patients to either internal or external cooling methods. Historical controls matched by age and gender were also selected for comparison. The study utilized SPSS version 21.0 for descriptive statistics and R 3.1.3 for univariate logistic regression.
Results
- Participants: 23 patients were randomized to internal cooling, 22 to external cooling, and 42 matched controls were selected.
- Outcomes: No significant difference was observed between internal and external cooling in terms of survival and neurological outcomes. However, internal cooling showed a lower risk of overcooling (p = 0.01) and rebound hyperthermia (p = 0.02).
- Survival: Internal cooling was associated with higher survival rates (OR = 3.36, 95% CI = (1.130, 10.412)) and a lower risk of cardiac arrhythmias (OR = 0.18, 95% CI = (0.04, 0.63)) compared to normothermia.
- Subgroup Analysis: Patients with a cardiac cause of arrest and those with sustained ROSC had better survival outcomes with internal cooling.
- Temperature Control: Internal cooling demonstrated tighter temperature control compared to external cooling.
Conclusion
Internal cooling offers tighter temperature control and may provide better survival-to-hospital discharge outcomes with fewer complications in carefully selected post-cardiac arrest patients compared to normothermia. This method could be particularly beneficial for patients with a cardiac cause of arrest and those who achieve sustained ROSC.
