VI-0609 is an investigational, innovative, ethanol-free formulation of the alkylating agent carmustine, developed by VIVUS LLC. Its primary objective is to address the significant infusion-related toxicities associated with the conventional ethanol-containing carmustine formulation (BiCNU), particularly when used in high-dose chemotherapy regimens prior to autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) for patients with lymphoma. These toxicities, often attributed to the ethanol solvent, include facial pain, nausea, vomiting, and local irritation, contributing to patient burden and potentially limiting the rate of drug administration.
Currently, VI-0609 is undergoing a multicenter, randomized Phase 2 clinical trial (NCT06915246) where it is being compared directly to BiCNU within the standard BEAM (Carmustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan) conditioning regimen for adult patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin or Non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The trial's primary endpoints focus on evaluating infusion-related toxicities within 24 hours post-infusion and unacceptable toxicities through Day 30 post-AHCT. Early reports suggest VI-0609 may utilize propylene glycol as an alternative solvent.
The anticipated benefits of VI-0609 include an improved safety and tolerability profile concerning infusion reactions, potentially allowing for shorter infusion times and thereby reducing patient discomfort and healthcare resource utilization. While VI-0609 aims to mitigate solvent-related adverse events, the intrinsic pharmacological properties and systemic toxicities of carmustine, such as myelosuppression and pulmonary toxicity, are expected to remain.
The development of VI-0609 exemplifies a strategic approach in pharmaceutical innovation focused on reformulating established therapeutic agents to enhance their clinical utility by improving safety and patient experience. This approach leverages the known efficacy of carmustine while addressing a specific, well-documented limitation of its current formulation. If the Phase 2 trial successfully demonstrates a favorable risk-benefit profile for VI-0609, particularly a reduction in infusion-related adverse events without compromising efficacy or introducing new significant toxicities, it could become a preferred carmustine formulation in lymphoma conditioning. The success of such a strategy could also encourage further exploration of solvent reformulation for other chemotherapeutic agents where excipients contribute to toxicity, potentially offering broader benefits to patients undergoing intensive cancer treatments.
VI-0609 is an investigational, small molecule drug representing an innovative, ethanol-free formulation of carmustine designed for intravenous injection.[1] Carmustine, the active pharmaceutical ingredient, is a well-established chemotherapeutic agent. The primary impetus for the development of VI-0609 stems from the desire to mitigate the infusion-related adverse events frequently associated with the conventional, ethanol-based formulation of carmustine, commercially known as BiCNU.[1] The ethanol solvent in BiCNU is implicated in a range of undesirable reactions, including facial pain, vomiting, flushing, and swelling of the tongue, which can cause significant patient discomfort and complicate treatment administration.[1]
By eliminating ethanol, VI-0609 is intended to offer an improved safety and tolerability profile, particularly during and immediately following infusion.[1] This improved tolerability is anticipated to translate into several clinical advantages, such as a reduction in the incidence and severity of infusion-related reactions and the potential for shorter drug infusion times compared to high-dose BiCNU.[1] Such improvements could substantially lessen the patient burden associated with high-dose conditioning therapy prior to autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT), a critical treatment modality for certain hematologic malignancies.[1] While many sources confirm the "ethanol-free" nature of VI-0609, specific details from clinical trial information suggest that the formulation may utilize propylene glycol as an alternative solvent system.[7] The choice of propylene glycol would be a considered pharmacological decision, aiming to maintain carmustine solubility—given its poor water solubility [8]—while offering a potentially less toxic solvent profile than ethanol. The ongoing clinical trials are crucial for validating the safety and comparative tolerability of this specific propylene glycol-based carmustine formulation.
VI-0609 has been developed by VIVUS LLC, a biopharmaceutical company headquartered in Campbell, California.[1] The company, also referred to as VIVUS, Inc. in some databases [2], is committed to the development and commercialization of innovative therapies targeting serious unmet medical needs.[1] VIVUS's portfolio extends beyond oncology, with marketed products such as QSYMIA® for chronic weight management and PANCREAZE® for exocrine pancreatic insufficiency.[2] The development of VI-0609 for bone marrow transplant preparation signifies an active expansion or diversification of VIVUS's pipeline into the oncology space.[2]
This strategic move into oncology with a reformulated product like VI-0609, rather than a novel molecular entity, may reflect an approach to leverage the established efficacy of an existing drug while addressing a clear clinical need for improved safety. The development of therapies for niche indications, such as conditioning regimens for AHCT, aligns with VIVUS's stated mission of focusing on serious unmet medical needs. The relatively defined development pathway for a reformulated product, focusing on comparative safety and tolerability against an existing standard, might also present a more manageable entry into the complex field of oncology therapeutics for a company with primary expertise in other areas.
Carmustine, also known as BCNU (1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea), is the active pharmaceutical ingredient in VI-0609. It is a highly lipid-soluble compound belonging to the nitrosourea class of chemotherapeutic agents.[8] Carmustine functions as a bifunctional alkylating agent.[9] Its primary mechanism involves the alkylation of DNA and RNA, leading to the formation of interstrand and intrastrand cross-links.[11] These cross-links interfere with DNA replication and transcription, ultimately inhibiting DNA synthesis, RNA production, and protein synthesis, which culminates in cell death.[12]
In addition to direct DNA and RNA damage, carmustine can also inhibit several key enzymatic processes through the carbamoylation of amino acids in proteins.[9] One notable target of carbamoylation is glutathione reductase, an enzyme crucial for cellular defense against oxidative stress; its inhibition can further sensitize cells to damage.[13] Carmustine is considered a cell-cycle phase non-specific agent, meaning it can exert its cytotoxic effects on cells regardless of their phase in the cell division cycle.[11] An important characteristic of carmustine is that it generally does not exhibit cross-resistance with other classes of alkylating agents, although cross-resistance with lomustine, another nitrosourea, has been reported.[9]
The fundamental cytotoxic mechanism of carmustine, centered on its alkylating and carbamoylating properties, will be inherent to VI-0609, as the active molecule remains unchanged. The reformulation to an ethanol-free preparation is designed to alter the delivery and immediate tolerability of the drug, not its intrinsic molecular interactions with cellular targets. Consequently, the efficacy profile and the spectrum of systemic (non-infusion-related) toxicities are anticipated to be similar between VI-0609 and ethanol-based carmustine formulations, assuming comparable systemic drug exposure is achieved.
The pharmacokinetic profile of intravenously administered carmustine has been well-characterized:
The pharmacokinetic parameters of carmustine are not expected to be fundamentally altered by the change in formulation from ethanol-based to ethanol-free (e.g., propylene glycol-based), assuming the new formulation achieves comparable systemic exposure of the active drug.
VI-0609 is currently in Phase 2 of clinical development, with a focus on its application in bone marrow transplant preparation.[1] While one VIVUS pipeline overview dated somewhat earlier indicated a Phase 1 status for VI-0609 in this indication [10], more recent and specific announcements regarding the active clinical trial NCT06915246 confirm its progression to Phase 2.[1] This trial is central to evaluating the clinical viability of VI-0609.
The pivotal study for VI-0609 is a Phase 2 clinical trial identified by the ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT06915246, and also referenced as NCI-2025-02742 and LY-201.[15]
The trial's design, comparing a propylene glycol-based carmustine formulation against the standard ethanol-based one, means the safety assessment will need to carefully distinguish between effects related to the absence of ethanol, potential effects of propylene glycol (which, while generally safer, can have its own toxicities at high doses or rapid infusion rates, such as hyperosmolality or lactic acidosis), and the background toxicities of carmustine itself.
VI-0609 is specifically being investigated for use in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).[1] The development program focuses on patients with refractory or relapsed forms of these lymphoid malignancies who are candidates for AHCT.[1] Carmustine (as BiCNU) already holds FDA approval for these indications, typically as a component of secondary therapy for patients who have relapsed or failed to respond to primary treatments.[8] Therefore, VI-0609 is not seeking to establish a new indication for carmustine but rather to provide an improved formulation for its existing use in this patient population.
The primary clinical utility envisioned for VI-0609 is as a component of high-dose chemotherapy conditioning regimens administered prior to AHCT.[1] The specific regimen highlighted in the clinical development of VI-0609 is BEAM (Carmustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan).[1] BEAM is a widely recognized and frequently utilized high-intensity conditioning regimen for lymphoma patients undergoing AHCT, designed to eradicate residual malignant cells and ablate the patient's bone marrow to allow for successful engraftment of transplanted hematopoietic stem cells.[3]
Conditioning regimens like BEAM are inherently intensive and associated with substantial toxicities that can significantly impact patient well-being and treatment outcomes.[1] VI-0609 aims to alleviate some of this burden by improving the tolerability of the carmustine component, which is often associated with acute infusion-related side effects.[1] By targeting the BEAM regimen, VIVUS is positioning VI-0609 for potential integration into an established standard of care. If the Phase 2 trial demonstrates improved safety and tolerability with at least non-inferior efficacy, VI-0609 could be adopted by transplant centers as a direct replacement for BiCNU within existing BEAM protocols. This straightforward substitution, without necessitating a complete overhaul of the conditioning regimen, could facilitate a relatively rapid uptake in clinical practice.
Furthermore, the focus on patients with "refractory or relapsed" lymphoma means VI-0609 is being evaluated in a population that has typically undergone multiple prior lines of therapy. Such patients may have diminished physiological reserves and heightened vulnerability to treatment-related toxicities. An improvement in the safety profile of a key conditioning agent like carmustine, even if primarily related to infusion reactions, could be particularly meaningful for this group. It could potentially lead to better overall tolerability of the AHCT process, reduced need for supportive care interventions, and an improved quality of life during a highly challenging treatment phase.
The central value proposition of VI-0609 lies in its potential to offer a superior safety and tolerability profile compared to the conventional ethanol-containing carmustine formulation, BiCNU. This advantage is primarily attributed to the elimination of ethanol as a solvent.[1] Ethanol in BiCNU is linked to a spectrum of infusion-related adverse events, including, but not limited to, facial pain, vomiting, swelling of the tongue, and flushing.[1] By being ethanol-free, VI-0609 is expected to significantly reduce the incidence and severity of these specific reactions, thereby improving the overall patient experience during carmustine administration.[1]
A corollary to improved infusion tolerability is the potential for VI-0609 to be administered over a shorter period compared to high-dose BiCNU.[1] The infusion rate of BiCNU is often limited by the need to manage ethanol-related side effects; for instance, a 300 mg/m2 dose in the BEAM regimen is typically infused over 3 hours.[17] If VI-0609 proves to be better tolerated during infusion, it might be possible to increase the administration rate, constrained only by the intrinsic pharmacology of carmustine or the tolerability of the alternative solvent (e.g., propylene glycol) at higher infusion speeds.
Shorter infusion times offer tangible benefits: they can reduce the overall time a patient needs to spend in the infusion suite, lessen patient discomfort and anxiety associated with prolonged infusions, and improve the operational efficiency of treatment centers by increasing patient throughput and optimizing resource allocation.[1] These practical and potential economic advantages could be strong drivers for the adoption of VI-0609, provided its safety and efficacy are confirmed.
The BEAM regimen is a cornerstone of conditioning therapy for lymphoma patients undergoing AHCT. It comprises:
A standard BEAM protocol involves Carmustine at a dose of 300 mg/m2 IV on day -6 relative to stem cell infusion (Day 0). This is followed by Etoposide (e.g., 100-200 mg/m2 IV, often administered twice daily or daily for several days, such as days -5 to -2), Cytarabine (e.g., 100-200 mg/m2 IV twice daily, typically on days -5 to -2), and Melphalan (e.g., 140 mg/m2 IV on day -1).[17] Specific dosages and schedules can exhibit minor variations between institutions. Carmustine is the first chemotherapeutic agent administered in this sequence.
The following table provides a comparative overview based on available information and anticipated characteristics:
Table 1: Comparative Overview of Carmustine Formulations in BEAM Conditioning
Feature | BiCNU (Ethanol-based) | VI-0609 (Ethanol-free, Propylene Glycol-based - Expected/Hypothesized) |
---|---|---|
Solvent | Ethanol | Propylene Glycol (based on NCT06915246 trial design 7) |
Standard Infusion Time (for 300 mg/m2) | Typically ≥ 2-3 hours 17 | Potentially shorter, pending trial data |
Common Infusion-Related Toxicities | Facial pain, flushing, local irritation/burning, nausea/vomiting (ethanol-induced), tongue swelling 1 | Expected reduction/absence of ethanol-specific toxicities |
Hypothesized Incidence of Infusion Reactions | Moderate to High | Low (for ethanol-related reactions) |
Potential for Dose Rate-Limiting Infusion Toxicity | Yes, due to ethanol | Reduced for ethanol; potential new limits based on propylene glycol/carmustine |
Patient-Reported Burden (Infusion Discomfort) | Can be significant | Expected to be lower |
Logistical Considerations for Administration | Slow infusion often required; premedication for ethanol effects may be considered | Potentially faster infusion; standard premedication for carmustine |
It is important to recognize that while the focus is on mitigating ethanol-related issues, the introduction of propylene glycol as a solvent in VI-0609 brings its own set of considerations. Propylene glycol is generally regarded as safe but is not inert. At high doses or with rapid infusion, it can be associated with adverse effects such as hyperosmolality, lactic acidosis, central nervous system depression, cardiotoxicity, and renal dysfunction. The substantial dose of carmustine used in BEAM regimens necessitates a considerable volume of solvent. Therefore, the clinical trial (NCT06915246) must meticulously evaluate the overall safety profile of the VI-0609 formulation to ensure that any new solvent-related issues do not offset the benefits gained from eliminating ethanol. The net clinical advantage will be determined by a comprehensive comparison of the complete safety profiles of both formulations.
Carmustine, as the active ingredient, is associated with a range of significant systemic toxicities, largely independent of the ethanol solvent in BiCNU. These are expected to be relevant for VI-0609 as well.
The use of carmustine requires careful consideration of its contraindications and adherence to specific precautions:
The primary safety advantage anticipated for VI-0609 is the reduction or elimination of acute, infusion-related adverse events that are specifically linked to the ethanol content of BiCNU. These include facial pain, ethanol-induced vomiting, tongue swelling, and flushing directly attributable to the solvent.[1] This improvement in immediate tolerability is a key objective of its development.
However, the systemic toxicities inherent to the carmustine molecule itself—such as myelosuppression, pulmonary toxicity, nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, and non-infusion-related gastrointestinal toxicity—are likely to persist with VI-0609, assuming comparable systemic exposure to carmustine. The Phase 2 trial (NCT06915246) is designed to capture data on "unacceptable toxicities" up to Day 30 post-AHCT, which will provide crucial information on the overall early safety profile of VI-0609 in the context of the BEAM regimen.[1]
A reduction in severe nausea and vomiting, if a component of these symptoms is directly related to ethanol during the infusion, could enhance patient compliance and comfort. This might also lessen the need for aggressive antiemetic premedication specifically targeted at the carmustine infusion itself. Nevertheless, because other components of the BEAM regimen (etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) are also emetogenic [17], comprehensive antiemetic prophylaxis will remain essential for patients undergoing this conditioning therapy.
It is also possible that the alternative solvent system used in VI-0609 (presumed to be propylene glycol based on trial information [7]) could introduce its own, albeit potentially milder, infusion site reactions or systemic effects. The clinical trial will be essential in characterizing any such new toxicities and determining the net safety benefit of VI-0609 compared to BiCNU. The major long-term and cumulative toxicities of carmustine, especially delayed pulmonary fibrosis and profound myelosuppression, will likely remain significant concerns requiring the same diligent monitoring and precautions as with BiCNU, as these are tied to the pharmacology of the active drug rather than the solvent.
Carmustine's metabolism, primarily hepatic and involving the cytochrome P450 (CYP) system [12], along with its effects on rapidly dividing cells and potential for organ toxicity, predisposes it to several drug interactions. These interactions are relevant to VI-0609 as the active drug remains carmustine.
The extensive list of potential interactions, particularly those where carmustine may decrease the excretion of other drugs, underscores the importance of a thorough medication review for any patient scheduled to receive carmustine. The change in formulation to VI-0609 is unlikely to alter these systemic drug interaction potentials, as they are primarily related to the carmustine molecule itself and its effects on metabolic enzymes or transporter systems.
Table 2: Selected Clinically Significant or Potential Drug Interactions with Carmustine
Interacting Drug/Class | Potential Effect with Carmustine | Management/Clinical Implication |
---|---|---|
Cimetidine | Increased myelosuppressive activity of carmustine 8 | Avoid co-administration if possible; if used, monitor hematologic parameters very closely. Consider alternative acid suppressants. |
Phenytoin / Fosphenytoin | Decreased serum concentrations of phenytoin/fosphenytoin 13 | Monitor phenytoin levels closely and adjust dosage as needed to maintain therapeutic concentrations. |
Phenobarbital | Potential alteration of carmustine metabolism (likely induction) 21 | Monitor for altered carmustine efficacy or toxicity if co-administered; consider alternatives to phenobarbital if possible. |
Other Myelosuppressive Agents (e.g., etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan in BEAM) | Additive or synergistic myelosuppression | Expected interaction in combination chemotherapy; monitor hematologic parameters vigilantly; dose adjustments based on toxicity. |
Live Vaccines | Decreased vaccine efficacy; risk of disseminated infection 23 | Avoid co-administration. Defer live vaccinations until immune recovery. |
Inactivated Vaccines | Decreased vaccine efficacy 23 | Administer vaccines prior to chemotherapy if possible; revaccination may be necessary post-treatment depending on immune response. |
Drugs with Renal Excretion Inhibited by Carmustine (Numerous examples in 13) | Increased serum levels and potential toxicity of the co-administered drug | Thorough medication review is essential. For critical narrow therapeutic index drugs, consider monitoring their levels or for signs of increased toxicity. |
Palifermin | Increased toxicity of carmustine if administered within 24 hours 23 | Do not administer palifermin within 24 hours before, during, or 24 hours after carmustine infusion. |
VI-0609 is currently an investigational drug and has not received marketing approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or other international regulatory authorities.[1] Its development is in Phase 2, with the NCT06915246 clinical trial actively evaluating its safety and tolerability.[1] While the individual components of the BEAM regimen, including carmustine (as BiCNU), etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan, are FDA-approved drugs, their use in the specific context of VI-0609 replacing BiCNU within BEAM is considered new and unproven from a regulatory standpoint for the VI-0609 formulation itself.[7]
The regulatory pathway for VI-0609 might benefit from the extensive existing knowledge on carmustine. As a reformulation of an approved drug, VI-0609 could potentially follow a more streamlined regulatory process, such as the FDA's 505(b)(2) pathway. This pathway allows applicants to reference existing data on the safety and efficacy of an approved drug (in this case, BiCNU), provided that bridging studies (like NCT06915246) can demonstrate comparable efficacy and/or an improved safety profile for the new formulation. The current Phase 2 trial's emphasis on infusion-related toxicity endpoints aligns well with a strategy aimed at demonstrating a key safety advantage over the reference product.
According to VIVUS's stated policy, the company is not currently making its unapproved investigational drugs, which would include VI-0609, available on an expanded access (compassionate use) basis.[10] Should VIVUS decide to consider expanded access requests in the future, such requests would be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.[10]
If the clinical development program, particularly the Phase 2 trial NCT06915246, successfully demonstrates that VI-0609 offers a significantly improved safety profile (especially concerning infusion-related toxicities) and comparable efficacy to BiCNU, it has the potential to become the preferred formulation of carmustine within conditioning regimens like BEAM.[1] Such an outcome could lead to several tangible benefits in clinical practice:
VIVUS has expressed optimism that VI-0609 may deliver improved outcomes for patients with refractory or relapsed Hodgkin or Non-Hodgkin lymphoma.[1] However, these forward-looking statements are appropriately tempered by acknowledgments of the inherent risks and uncertainties in pharmaceutical research and development. These include the possibility of not meeting anticipated clinical endpoints, delays in trial completion or regulatory submissions, and ultimately, the challenge of securing regulatory approval and successful market launch.[1]
The market adoption of VI-0609, if approved, will likely be influenced by pharmacoeconomic considerations in addition to clinical data. As BiCNU is an older drug with available generic versions, it represents a relatively low-cost component of the BEAM regimen. VI-0609, as a newly developed, proprietary formulation, would likely be introduced at a premium price. Therefore, demonstrating a clear clinical and economic advantage—such as a reduction in hospitalization days due to toxicity, decreased need for rescue medications, or substantial improvements in patient-reported outcomes and quality of life—will be crucial for justifying its value to healthcare providers and payers and ensuring widespread adoption.
VI-0609, an investigational ethanol-free formulation of carmustine developed by VIVUS LLC, represents a targeted effort to improve the therapeutic index of a long-established chemotherapeutic agent. Its current evaluation in a Phase 2 clinical trial (NCT06915246) as part of the BEAM conditioning regimen for patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma undergoing autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation is a critical step in determining its future clinical role. The primary rationale for VI-0609's development is the mitigation of ethanol-related infusion toxicities associated with the conventional BiCNU formulation, which are a known source of patient discomfort and clinical management challenges.
The successful demonstration of reduced infusion-related adverse events, potentially coupled with the ability to shorten infusion times without compromising the systemic efficacy of carmustine, would mark a significant patient-centric advancement. This focus on improving tolerability and the patient experience during intensive cancer therapy aligns with an increasingly important paradigm in oncology drug development, where enhancements in quality of life are recognized as valuable clinical outcomes alongside traditional efficacy measures.
While VI-0609 holds the promise of alleviating specific solvent-related side effects, it is anticipated that the broader systemic toxicity profile inherent to carmustine, including delayed myelosuppression and pulmonary toxicity, will persist. Therefore, vigilant monitoring and adherence to established precautions for carmustine therapy will remain paramount. The ultimate success of VI-0609 will hinge on the demonstration of a clear net clinical benefit: a superior safety profile for infusion-related events compared to BiCNU, assurance that the alternative solvent system (likely propylene glycol) does not introduce new, offsetting safety concerns, and confirmation that the anti-lymphoma efficacy of carmustine is preserved. The data emerging from the ongoing Phase 2 trial will be instrumental in shaping the future therapeutic landscape for carmustine-containing conditioning regimens and will determine if VI-0609 can indeed offer a safer, more tolerable option for this vulnerable patient population.
Published at: May 19, 2025
This report is continuously updated as new research emerges.