C30H24N4O8
863031-21-4
Albuminuria, Hypertension, Atrial Fibrillation
Azilsartan medoxomil is an orally administered angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) that functions as a prodrug. It undergoes hydrolysis in the gastrointestinal tract to its pharmacologically active metabolite, azilsartan.[1] This small molecule drug, identified by DrugBank ID DB08822 and CAS Number 863031-21-4, plays a significant role in the management of hypertension.[1]
The chemical name for azilsartan medoxomil is (5-Methyl-2-oxo-1,3-dioxol-4-yl)methyl 2-ethoxy-1-[[2'-(5-oxo-4,5-dihydro-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl)biphenyl-4-yl]methyl]-1H-benzimidazole-7-carboxylate.[2] Its molecular formula is C30H24N4O8, and it has a molecular weight of approximately 568.53 g/mol.[4] The potassium salt, azilsartan kamedoxomil, is often used in pharmaceutical formulations.[3] Azilsartan medoxomil is marketed under various brand names, most notably Edarbi® for the monotherapy formulation and Edarbyclor® for the fixed-dose combination product with the diuretic chlorthalidone.[1]
The prodrug design, incorporating the medoxomil ester, is a deliberate pharmaceutical strategy. This moiety is cleaved in vivo, primarily during absorption in the gastrointestinal tract and/or via first-pass metabolism, to release the active azilsartan.[1] Such strategies are commonly employed in drug development to enhance oral bioavailability, modulate absorption rates, or improve the physicochemical properties of a drug candidate. The specific medoxomil ester is also found in other ARB prodrugs, such as olmesartan medoxomil and candesartan cilexetil, suggesting a well-characterized and efficient enzymatic hydrolysis pathway. The efficiency and site of this conversion can influence the peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and time to reach peak concentration (Tmax) of active azilsartan, potentially contributing to inter-patient variability in drug exposure. The structural complexity of azilsartan, featuring multiple heterocyclic rings including benzimidazole and oxadiazole components, underscores a potentially intricate chemical synthesis process. This complexity may have implications for manufacturing costs and the historical timeline for the development and availability of generic alternatives.
Azilsartan medoxomil was developed by Takeda Pharmaceuticals.[7] It received its first marketing approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in February 2011 for the treatment of hypertension in adults.[1] This was followed by the FDA approval of Edarbyclor®, the fixed-dose combination of azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone, in December 2011.[10]
In the European Union, azilsartan medoxomil (Edarbi®) was granted marketing authorisation by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in July 2011 for the treatment of essential hypertension.[7] Health Canada approved the drug in March 2012 for mild to moderate essential hypertension.[7] The regulatory approvals were based on a comprehensive clinical development program that included studies comparing azilsartan medoxomil to placebo and other established ARBs, such as valsartan and olmesartan medoxomil, as well as the ACE inhibitor ramipril.[3]
Azilsartan medoxomil was the eighth ARB to enter the market, positioning it within a well-established therapeutic class for hypertension management.[3] Its development and subsequent approvals in major global regions underscored the ongoing need for effective and well-tolerated antihypertensive therapies. The development strategy likely focused on demonstrating clinically meaningful advantages, such as superior blood pressure reduction or an improved 24-hour pharmacodynamic profile, compared to existing agents. This is a common approach for newer drugs entering a competitive therapeutic area. The emphasis in its clinical trial program on 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) reflects an evolving standard in hypertension management, prioritizing consistent blood pressure control over the entire dosing interval rather than solely focusing on trough (pre-dose) effects.[3] This comprehensive assessment of efficacy was likely a key element in differentiating azilsartan medoxomil from earlier antihypertensive agents.
Azilsartan medoxomil exerts its therapeutic effects through its active metabolite, azilsartan. Following oral administration, the prodrug azilsartan medoxomil is rapidly and completely hydrolyzed to azilsartan, primarily in the gastrointestinal tract during absorption.[1] Azilsartan is a potent and highly selective antagonist of the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor.[1]
Angiotensin II is the principal pressor agent of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), a critical hormonal cascade involved in blood pressure regulation and fluid-electrolyte balance. Angiotensin II mediates its effects by binding to AT1 receptors located in various tissues, including vascular smooth muscle, the adrenal cortex, kidneys, and heart.[1] Activation of AT1 receptors by angiotensin II leads to vasoconstriction, stimulation of aldosterone synthesis and release (which promotes sodium and water retention), increased cardiac contractility, and renal sodium reabsorption.[1]
Azilsartan competitively and selectively blocks the binding of angiotensin II to the AT1 receptor, thereby antagonizing these physiological actions.[1] This blockade results in vasodilation, reduced aldosterone secretion, and consequently, a decrease in blood pressure. Azilsartan exhibits a very high affinity for the AT1 receptor, reported to be more than 10,000-fold greater than its affinity for the angiotensin II type 2 (AT2) receptor.[1] The AT2 receptor is not known to be primarily involved in cardiovascular homeostasis in the context of hypertension, and its blockade is not considered to contribute to the antihypertensive effects of ARBs.[19]
A distinguishing characteristic of azilsartan is its interaction with the AT1 receptor. It is described as an "insurmountable" antagonist, and it appears to dissociate from the AT1 receptor more slowly than many other ARBs.[1] This slow dissociation and insurmountable antagonism suggest a more tenacious and prolonged blockade of the AT1 receptor, even in the presence of fluctuating angiotensin II levels. Such properties are thought to contribute to azilsartan's potent and sustained antihypertensive effect observed over a 24-hour dosing interval. Surmountable antagonists can be displaced from the receptor by high concentrations of the natural agonist (angiotensin II), potentially leading to a diminished effect. In contrast, insurmountable antagonists form a more stable drug-receptor complex or induce conformational changes in the receptor that prevent agonist binding or activation, making their effects less susceptible to being overcome by increased agonist concentrations. This robust receptor blockade likely underpins the consistent blood pressure control observed with azilsartan.
As a consequence of AT1 receptor blockade, there is a compensatory increase in plasma renin activity and circulating levels of angiotensin I and angiotensin II, due to the loss of negative feedback on renin release.[1] However, these elevated levels of angiotensin II are unable to overcome the antihypertensive effect of azilsartan due to the effective AT1 receptor blockade. Importantly, azilsartan does not inhibit angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), the enzyme responsible for converting angiotensin I to angiotensin II and for degrading bradykinin.[1] Therefore, unlike ACE inhibitors, azilsartan does not lead to an accumulation of bradykinin, which is believed to be responsible for the characteristic dry cough associated with ACE inhibitor therapy.
The pharmacodynamic effects of azilsartan medoxomil are mediated by its active metabolite, azilsartan. Azilsartan demonstrates a dose-dependent inhibition of the pressor (blood pressure-increasing) effects of an angiotensin II infusion.[1] Clinical studies have shown that a single oral dose of azilsartan medoxomil equivalent to 32 mg of azilsartan can inhibit the maximal pressor response to angiotensin II by approximately 90% at peak plasma concentrations and by about 60% at 24 hours post-dose.[1] This indicates a substantial and sustained blockade of angiotensin II's vasoconstrictive actions.
Consistent with its mechanism of action on the RAAS, administration of azilsartan medoxomil leads to a decrease in plasma aldosterone concentrations.[1] Aldosterone promotes sodium and water retention, so its reduction contributes to the overall blood pressure-lowering effect and may also mitigate potassium loss.
The antihypertensive effect of azilsartan medoxomil typically becomes evident within the first two weeks of initiating therapy, with the maximal blood pressure-lowering effect generally achieved by four weeks of continuous once-daily dosing.[6] This time course is important for clinicians to consider when titrating doses and assessing therapeutic response. The blood pressure-lowering effect is maintained throughout the 24-hour dosing interval, providing consistent control.[6] Such sustained 24-hour efficacy is crucial for reducing the risks associated with blood pressure variability, including potential morning blood pressure surges or inadequate nocturnal blood pressure control, which are independent risk factors for cardiovascular events.
In clinical trials, azilsartan medoxomil has shown negligible clinically significant effects on serum potassium or sodium levels when used as monotherapy in patients with normal renal function.[1] However, as with all agents that inhibit the RAAS, there is a potential risk of hyperkalemia, particularly in patients with renal impairment, diabetes, or those concomitantly receiving other medications that can increase serum potassium (e.g., potassium-sparing diuretics, ACE inhibitors, potassium supplements).
Pharmacodynamic studies have also investigated the potential for azilsartan medoxomil to affect cardiac repolarization. At a dose of 320 mg (four times the maximum recommended therapeutic dose), Edarbi® did not demonstrate any evidence of QT/QTc interval prolongation on the electrocardiogram.[19] This finding suggests a low risk of drug-induced torsades de pointes or other ventricular arrhythmias related to QT prolongation at therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses.
The pharmacokinetic profile of azilsartan medoxomil is characterized by its conversion to the active moiety, azilsartan, and the subsequent disposition of azilsartan.
Absorption: Azilsartan medoxomil is administered orally as a prodrug. During absorption from the gastrointestinal tract, it undergoes rapid and complete hydrolysis by esterases to form the active drug, azilsartan.[1] The parent prodrug, azilsartan medoxomil, is not detectable in plasma following oral administration.[1] The absolute bioavailability of azilsartan is estimated to be approximately 60%.[1] Peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) of azilsartan are typically reached within 1.5 to 3 hours after oral dosing.[1] The absorption and bioavailability of azilsartan are not significantly affected by food, allowing for administration with or without meals, which can enhance patient convenience and adherence.[3]
Distribution: Azilsartan has an apparent volume of distribution (Vd) of approximately 16 liters, suggesting it distributes into tissues beyond the plasma volume but is not extensively distributed throughout the body.[1] Azilsartan is highly bound to human plasma proteins, primarily serum albumin, with protein binding exceeding 99%.[1] This high degree of protein binding is constant at plasma concentrations well above those achieved with recommended therapeutic doses. Due to its high protein binding, the free fraction of the drug, which is pharmacologically active, is low. Conditions that significantly alter serum albumin levels (e.g., severe liver disease, nephrotic syndrome) could theoretically affect the free fraction of azilsartan, although the clinical significance of this is not fully established. Animal studies in rats indicate minimal penetration of azilsartan across the blood-brain barrier.[1] However, azilsartan has been shown to cross the placental barrier in pregnant rats and is distributed to the fetus.[1]
Metabolism: Azilsartan is metabolized in the liver primarily by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 isoenzyme.[1] It is converted to two main metabolites: M-I (formed by decarboxylation, a minor pathway) and M-II (formed by O-dealkylation, the major pathway). Neither of these metabolites contributes significantly to the pharmacological activity of azilsartan medoxomil; they are considered inactive.[3] The involvement of CYP2C9 is a key consideration for potential drug-drug interactions with inhibitors or inducers of this enzyme.
Elimination and Half-life: The elimination of azilsartan occurs through both renal and fecal routes. Following oral administration of $^{14}$C-labeled azilsartan medoxomil, approximately 55% of the radioactivity is recovered in the feces, and about 42% is recovered in the urine.[1] Approximately 15% of the administered dose is excreted in the urine as unchanged azilsartan.[1] The renal clearance of azilsartan is approximately 2.3 mL/min.[1] The terminal elimination half-life (t1/2) of azilsartan is approximately 11 hours.[1] Steady-state plasma concentrations are achieved within 5 days of once-daily dosing, and no accumulation of azilsartan occurs with repeated administration.[3] Azilsartan is not significantly removed from the circulation by hemodialysis.[1] This pharmacokinetic profile, particularly the half-life, supports convenient once-daily administration. The dual routes of elimination might offer some resilience against drug accumulation in patients with impairment in a single elimination pathway, although caution and monitoring are still necessary in such populations.
Table 1: Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Azilsartan
Parameter | Value | Reference Snippets |
---|---|---|
Prodrug | Azilsartan medoxomil | 1 |
Active Moiety | Azilsartan | 1 |
Absolute Bioavailability (F) | ~60% | 3 |
Time to Peak Plasma Concentration (Tmax) | 1.5 - 3 hours | 3 |
Effect of Food on Bioavailability | None significant | 3 |
Volume of Distribution (Vd) | ~16 L | 1 |
Plasma Protein Binding | >99% (mainly albumin) | 1 |
Primary Metabolizing Enzyme | CYP2C9 | 3 |
Major Metabolites | M-I (minor, inactive), M-II (major, inactive) | 3 |
Elimination Half-life (t1/2) | ~11 hours | 1 |
Time to Steady State | Within 5 days | 3 |
Renal Clearance | ~2.3 mL/min | 1 |
% Excreted Unchanged in Urine | ~15% | 1 |
% Recovered in Feces (as metabolites/unchanged drug) | ~55% | 1 |
% Recovered in Urine (as metabolites/unchanged drug) | ~42% | 1 |
Dialyzability | Not dialyzable | 1 |
This table consolidates the key pharmacokinetic characteristics of azilsartan, derived from its prodrug azilsartan medoxomil. These parameters are fundamental for understanding its absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination, which collectively inform appropriate dosing strategies, prediction of potential drug interactions, and considerations for use in specific patient populations, such as those with renal or hepatic impairment. The high bioavailability and lack of food effect contribute to predictable absorption and dosing convenience. The 11-hour half-life supports once-daily administration. Metabolism via CYP2C9 highlights a potential pathway for drug interactions, while the dual routes of elimination and non-dialyzability are important considerations in patients with organ dysfunction or in cases of overdose.
Azilsartan medoxomil is primarily indicated for the treatment of hypertension in adult patients, to lower elevated blood pressure.[1] It can be used as monotherapy or in combination with other antihypertensive agents.[1] The fixed-dose combination product, Edarbyclor® (azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone), is specifically indicated for the treatment of hypertension in patients whose blood pressure is not adequately controlled with monotherapy, or it may be used as initial therapy if a patient is likely to require multiple drugs to achieve their blood pressure goals.[9]
The therapeutic goal of using azilsartan medoxomil in hypertension is to reduce blood pressure, which is a well-established intervention for decreasing the risk of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events, most notably strokes and myocardial infarctions.[1] This benefit is considered a class effect for antihypertensive drugs that effectively lower blood pressure. However, it is important to note that the prescribing information for Edarbi® and Edarbyclor® explicitly states that there are no controlled trials demonstrating direct cardiovascular risk reduction specifically with these products themselves.[8] The inference of cardiovascular benefit is based on their blood pressure-lowering efficacy.
Clinical trials have robustly demonstrated the efficacy of azilsartan medoxomil as monotherapy for hypertension. Both 40 mg and 80 mg once-daily doses of azilsartan medoxomil have been shown to produce statistically significant reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure from baseline when compared to placebo.[3]
Furthermore, comparative efficacy studies have positioned azilsartan medoxomil favorably against other established antihypertensive agents. Notably, the 80 mg daily dose of Edarbi® has demonstrated superior blood pressure reduction compared to the maximum approved doses of other ARBs, including olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg and valsartan 320 mg.[3] In head-to-head trials, azilsartan medoxomil 80 mg provided greater reductions in both clinic blood pressure and 24-hour mean systolic blood pressure as measured by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) than these comparators.[3] For instance, one study reported that Edarbi® 80 mg/day lowered 24-hour mean systolic blood pressure by 14.3 mm Hg from baseline, which was statistically superior to valsartan 320 mg/day (-10.0 mm Hg) and olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg/day (-11.7 mm Hg).[8] Azilsartan medoxomil (40 mg and 80 mg) has also been shown to be more effective in reducing clinic systolic blood pressure than the ACE inhibitor ramipril 10 mg.[3]
A network meta-analysis encompassing 21 studies on systolic blood pressure and 20 studies on diastolic blood pressure in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension found that azilsartan medoxomil 80 mg had the highest probability (93% for systolic BP, 90% for diastolic BP) of being the most efficacious treatment among all included antihypertensives (which included other ARBs, ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, and calcium channel blockers) when compared against placebo.[29]
The consistent findings of superior blood pressure lowering, particularly with the 80 mg dose, suggest that azilsartan medoxomil could be a particularly effective ARB for patients requiring more substantial blood pressure reductions or for those who have not achieved target blood pressure levels with other ARBs or antihypertensive classes. The pharmacodynamic characteristics of azilsartan, including its potent, insurmountable, and long-lasting AT1 receptor blockade, likely contribute to this observed clinical superiority in blood pressure reduction. This enhanced efficacy may facilitate faster attainment of blood pressure goals, which is critical for mitigating long-term cardiovascular risk, although direct evidence of superior cardiovascular outcome reduction for azilsartan over other ARBs is not available from the provided information. The robust 24-hour blood pressure control demonstrated in ABPM studies is a significant advantage, as it addresses the entire diurnal blood pressure profile, including potentially problematic nocturnal hypertension or early morning surges.
Recognizing that many patients with hypertension require more than one agent to achieve blood pressure targets, azilsartan medoxomil has also been evaluated in combination with other antihypertensive classes.[1] The fixed-dose combination product, Edarbyclor® (azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone), is designed to provide additive blood pressure lowering and is indicated for patients not adequately controlled on monotherapy or as an initial therapeutic option for those likely to need multiple drugs.[10]
Clinical studies have confirmed the enhanced efficacy of combining azilsartan medoxomil with diuretics or calcium channel blockers. The addition of chlorthalidone to azilsartan medoxomil results in significantly greater reductions in blood pressure compared to either component used as monotherapy.[3] For example, patients not controlled with chlorthalidone 25 mg experienced an additional clinic blood pressure reduction of 10/7 mm Hg when switched to Edarbyclor® 40/12.5 mg.[10] Similarly, the combination of azilsartan medoxomil with the calcium channel blocker amlodipine has been shown to significantly lower 24-hour systolic and diastolic blood pressure more effectively than amlodipine alone in patients with stage 2 hypertension.[3]
The choice of chlorthalidone as the diuretic component in Edarbyclor® is noteworthy. Chlorthalidone is a long-acting thiazide-like diuretic that is generally considered more potent and has a longer duration of action than hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), which is more commonly found in other ARB fixed-dose combinations. Furthermore, chlorthalidone has more robust evidence supporting its efficacy in reducing cardiovascular events in major hypertension outcome trials. One review noted that azilsartan medoxomil combined with chlorthalidone was more effective in lowering systolic BP than when combined with HCTZ.[3] This suggests a deliberate formulation strategy for Edarbyclor® aimed at maximizing both antihypertensive potency and leveraging the established cardiovascular benefits associated with chlorthalidone. Consequently, Edarbyclor® may represent a particularly effective ARB/diuretic combination for patients requiring substantial and sustained blood pressure control.
Table 2: Summary of Key Clinical Trial Efficacy Data in Hypertension (Edarbi® and Edarbyclor®)
Trial Identifier/Reference (if available) | Drug(s) & Dosage(s) | Patient Population | Primary Efficacy Endpoint | Key Efficacy Results | Source Snippet(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Phase 3 Study (vs. Placebo, Valsartan, Olmesartan) | Edarbi® 40 mg, 80 mg; Valsartan 320 mg; Olmesartan 40 mg; Placebo | Mild to Moderate Hypertension | Change in 24-hour mean SBP (ABPM) | Edarbi® 80mg: -14.3 mmHg; Edarbi® 40mg: -13.2 mmHg. Edarbi® 80mg superior to Valsartan 320mg (-10.0 mmHg) and Olmesartan 40mg (-11.7 mmHg). All active treatments superior to placebo. | 3 |
Phase 3 Study (vs. Ramipril) | Edarbi® 40 mg, 80 mg; Ramipril 10 mg | Hypertension | Change in clinic SBP | Edarbi® 40mg and 80mg significantly more effective than Ramipril 10mg. | 3 |
Network Meta-analysis | AZL-M 40mg, 80mg vs. other antihypertensives (ARBs, ACEIs, BBs, CCBs) | Mild to Moderate Hypertension | Absolute office SBP and DBP reductions | AZL-M 80mg: highest probability (93% SBP, 90% DBP) of being best treatment. | 29 |
Factorial Study (Edarbyclor®) | Azilsartan medoxomil (AZL-M) / Chlorthalidone (CLD) various doses (e.g., 40/12.5 mg, 40/25 mg, 80/25 mg) vs. monotherapy components | Hypertension | Change in trough SBP (ABPM and clinic) | AZL-M/CLD combinations produced significantly greater SBP reductions vs. respective monotherapies. e.g., AZL-M/CLD 40/25 mg significantly greater reduction than AZL-M 80 mg or CLD 25 mg alone. | 3 |
Combination Study (vs. Amlodipine) | Edarbi® 40mg, 80mg + Amlodipine 5mg vs. Amlodipine 5mg alone | Stage 2 Hypertension | Change in 24-hour SBP and DBP | Edarbi® + Amlodipine significantly greater BP reduction than Amlodipine alone. | 3 |
Edarbyclor® Switch Study | Switch from Chlorthalidone 25mg to Edarbyclor® 40/12.5mg | Patients not controlled on Chlorthalidone 25mg | Additional clinic BP reduction | Additional 10/7 mmHg reduction. | 10 |
This table summarizes key findings from clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of azilsartan medoxomil, both as monotherapy (Edarbi®) and in combination with chlorthalidone (Edarbyclor®). The data consistently demonstrate potent blood pressure lowering, often superior to other commonly used ARBs and ACE inhibitors. The use of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in many of these trials provides a robust assessment of efficacy over the entire dosing interval. These findings support the role of azilsartan medoxomil as an effective option for hypertension management, with Edarbyclor® offering a powerful combination for patients requiring more intensive therapy.
The primary rationale for treating hypertension is the reduction of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. It is well established that lowering blood pressure with antihypertensive agents, as a class, is associated with a reduced risk of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events, particularly strokes and myocardial infarctions.[1] Based on its potent blood pressure-lowering effects, azilsartan medoxomil is therefore speculated to contribute to a reduction in mortality rates and the incidence of cardiovascular disease.[1]
However, a critical distinction must be made: the prescribing information for both Edarbi® and Edarbyclor® explicitly states that there are no controlled trials that have specifically demonstrated a reduction in cardiovascular risk (e.g., MI, stroke, cardiovascular death) directly with azilsartan medoxomil or its combination with chlorthalidone.[8] This means that while the drug effectively lowers a major risk factor (high blood pressure), its direct impact on hard cardiovascular endpoints has not been established through dedicated, large-scale cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) in the same way that some other ARBs (like losartan in the LIFE trial for stroke prevention in hypertensive patients with LVH, or valsartan in the VALIANT trial for post-MI patients with HF/LV dysfunction) have demonstrated benefits in specific populations.[3]
The ALMIGHTY study, a prospective, open-label trial, suggested that switching to azilsartan from another ARB in patients with uncontrolled hypertension led to a reduction in day-to-day morning blood pressure variability (BPV) and an improvement in arterial stiffness, as measured by the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI).[32] Both increased BPV and arterial stiffness are recognized as independent predictors of cardiovascular events. While these findings on surrogate markers are promising and suggest potential cardiovascular benefits beyond mean BP reduction, they do not substitute for evidence from large CVOTs focused on clinical endpoints. One review article noted that existing mortality studies (referring to broader ARB class or hypertension treatment in general, not specific azilsartan CVOTs) have not definitively correlated azilsartan's specific properties with reduced mortality, suggesting this as an area for further investigation.[20] The snippets [55] and [56], which discuss CVOTs, pertain to glucose-lowering drugs and are not relevant to azilsartan medoxomil's direct CVOT evidence.
Therefore, the cardiovascular benefits of azilsartan medoxomil are primarily inferred from its robust antihypertensive efficacy and the general class effects of ARBs on the RAAS. The lack of dedicated CVOT data means that for specific high-risk cardiovascular conditions where other ARBs have proven outcome benefits (e.g., heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, specific post-myocardial infarction scenarios), those agents with direct trial evidence might be preferred by guideline writers and clinicians, unless azilsartan demonstrates comparable or superior outcomes in future dedicated trials. Clinicians currently rely on azilsartan's superior blood pressure-lowering capacity as the main driver for its potential to reduce cardiovascular risk.
Beyond its approved indication for hypertension, there has been some speculation and investigation into potential off-label applications for azilsartan medoxomil, largely based on the known roles of the RAAS in various pathophysiological processes and the established benefits of ARBs as a class in certain conditions.
Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure: Several DrugBank entries and PubChem descriptions note that azilsartan medoxomil may have potential off-label uses in patients with a history of myocardial infarction (MI) or heart failure (HF), but they consistently qualify this by stating that "there is no clinical significance yet determined".[1] One review mentioned that azilsartan demonstrated a dose-dependent reduction in myocardial infarction in preclinical (animal) models.[14] However, the available research snippets do not provide evidence from human clinical trials specifically evaluating azilsartan medoxomil for these indications. A meta-analysis concerning ARBs in general (not specific to azilsartan) for heart failure indicated that ARBs did not reduce total mortality or morbidity compared to placebo or ACE inhibitors in the studied populations.[33] Given that specific ARBs like valsartan and candesartan have established roles in certain heart failure and post-MI populations based on large outcome trials, azilsartan medoxomil would require similar dedicated studies to define its utility in these settings.
Albuminuria and Diabetic Nephropathy: Angiotensin II receptor blockers as a class are recognized for their renoprotective effects and are commonly used off-label, or as an indicated therapy for some specific ARBs, to decrease the progression of moderate-to-severe albuminuria, particularly in patients with diabetes mellitus and hypertension.[1] Some ARBs, such as irbesartan and losartan, have specific FDA approvals for the treatment of diabetic nephropathy.[3] A phase 4 clinical study (reported in 2022) evaluated the efficacy and safety of azilsartan medoxomil in Asian patients with essential hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The study concluded that azilsartan medoxomil demonstrated a favorable efficacy and safety profile in achieving target blood pressure in this population.[30] While this study supports its use in hypertensive diabetics, a population often at risk for albuminuria and nephropathy, it primarily focused on blood pressure goals rather than specific renal endpoints like reduction in albuminuria progression. Therefore, any use for albuminuria reduction with azilsartan would currently be based on extrapolating the known class effects of ARBs.
Atrial Fibrillation: The DrugBank resource mentions that ARBs as a class are sometimes used off-label to prevent the recurrence of atrial fibrillation in patients with diabetes mellitus and hypertension.[1] However, the provided snippets do not contain any specific clinical trial data investigating the efficacy of azilsartan medoxomil for the prevention of atrial fibrillation beyond this general class effect mention.
In summary, while the potent RAAS blockade achieved by azilsartan medoxomil theoretically suggests potential benefits in conditions such as post-MI, heart failure, and diabetic nephropathy, the current evidence from the provided materials for such off-label uses is largely speculative or based on class effects rather than dedicated clinical trials for azilsartan itself. Its application for reducing albuminuria or preventing atrial fibrillation would primarily rely on the established benefits of the ARB class in these contexts. Further targeted research, including large-scale outcome trials, would be necessary to firmly establish the role and clinical significance of azilsartan medoxomil in these potential off-label indications.
The safety and tolerability of azilsartan medoxomil have been evaluated in numerous clinical trials.
Edarbi® (Azilsartan Medoxomil Monotherapy):
When used as monotherapy, Edarbi® is generally well-tolerated, with an overall incidence of adverse events similar to that observed with placebo.3
Edarbyclor® (Azilsartan Medoxomil/Chlorthalidone):
The fixed-dose combination product, Edarbyclor®, introduces adverse effects characteristic of the thiazide-like diuretic chlorthalidone, in addition to those of azilsartan medoxomil.
Serious Adverse Reactions (Class Effects/Rare):
The potential for hypokalemia and hyperuricemia with Edarbyclor® necessitates baseline and periodic monitoring of serum electrolytes and uric acid. While diarrhea with Edarbi® monotherapy is generally mild, it could be a consideration for patient adherence or choice of ARB in individuals with pre-existing gastrointestinal sensitivities.
Table 3: Common and Clinically Significant Adverse Reactions of Azilsartan Medoxomil (Edarbi® and Edarbyclor®)
System Organ Class | Adverse Reaction | Frequency (Edarbi® - FDA/EMA) | Frequency (Edarbyclor® - FDA) | Notes | Source Snippet(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gastrointestinal Disorders | Diarrhea | Common (FDA: up to 2% with 80mg; EMA: Common) | Common (chlorthalidone component can also cause GI upset) | Most common for Edarbi® | 6 |
Nausea | Uncommon (EMA); >0.3% & >placebo (FDA) | Not specified as common | 6 | ||
Abdominal Pain | - | Not specified as common (but FMF patients on colchicine, a different drug, report this; not directly relevant to azilsartan. Chlorthalidone can cause GI upset) | Intestinal angioedema (rare, serious) presents with abdominal pain | 6 | |
Nervous System Disorders | Dizziness | Common (EMA); >0.3% & >placebo (FDA) | Common (8.9%) | More frequent with Edarbyclor® | 6 |
Postural Dizziness | >0.3% & >placebo (FDA) | Not specified as common | 19 | ||
General Disorders & Administration Site Conditions | Fatigue | Uncommon (EMA); >0.3% & >placebo (FDA) | Common (2.0%) | 6 | |
Asthenia (Weakness) | >0.3% & >placebo (FDA) | Not specified as common | 19 | ||
Peripheral Oedema | Uncommon (EMA) | Not specified as common (but increased to common when Edarbi® co-administered with amlodipine) | 6 | ||
Musculoskeletal & Connective Tissue Disorders | Muscle Spasm | Uncommon (EMA); >0.3% & >placebo (FDA) | Not specified as common | 6 | |
Increased Blood Creatine Phosphokinase | Common (EMA) | Not specified | 6 | ||
Vascular Disorders | Hypotension | Uncommon (EMA) | Not specified as common (but can occur, especially if volume depleted) | Most common AE leading to Edarbi® discontinuation (0.4%) | 3 |
Skin & Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders | Rash | Uncommon (EMA) | Not specified | 6 | |
Pruritus | Uncommon (EMA) | Not specified | 6 | ||
Angioedema | Rare (EMA) | Rare (Class effect) | Serious; discontinue immediately | 6 | |
Respiratory, Thoracic & Mediastinal Disorders | Cough | >0.3% & >placebo (FDA, low incidence) | Not specified | Incidence similar to placebo for Edarbi® | 19 |
Investigations | Blood Creatinine Increased | Uncommon (EMA); Small, reversible increases (FDA) | Common (when Edarbi® co-administered with chlorthalidone) | More likely with 80mg Edarbi®, renal impairment, elderly, or with diuretics | 3 |
Blood Uric Acid Increased / Hyperuricemia | Uncommon (EMA) | Common (Chlorthalidone effect) | May precipitate gout | 6 | |
Metabolism & Nutrition Disorders | Hypokalemia | Not typical for Edarbi® monotherapy | Common (Chlorthalidone effect) | Dose-dependent with chlorthalidone; monitor K+ | 10 |
The contraindications for azilsartan medoxomil vary slightly between its monotherapy (Edarbi®) and combination (Edarbyclor®) formulations, and also between regulatory agencies (FDA and EMA).
Edarbi® (Azilsartan Medoxomil Monotherapy):
Edarbyclor® (Azilsartan Medoxomil/Chlorthalidone):
The contraindication related to the concomitant use of ARBs (like azilsartan) and aliskiren in patients with diabetes (and moderate to severe renal impairment by EMA criteria) is a critical safety measure. This combination has been associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes, including renal impairment, hypotension, and hyperkalemia, without providing additional cardiovascular benefit in these populations. The evolution of this contraindication for Edarbi® highlights the importance of ongoing pharmacovigilance and the dynamic nature of drug safety information. Healthcare providers must ensure they are referencing the most current prescribing information to guide clinical decisions.
Several important warnings and precautions are associated with the use of azilsartan medoxomil, both as monotherapy and in combination with chlorthalidone.
These warnings and precautions underscore the critical role of the RAAS in maintaining cardiovascular and renal homeostasis. While inhibiting this system is beneficial for managing hypertension, excessive suppression or inhibition in vulnerable physiological states (such as pregnancy, volume depletion, or renal artery stenosis) can lead to significant adverse outcomes. Therefore, a thorough patient assessment, including evaluation of pregnancy status, volume status, renal function, and concomitant medications, is essential before initiating therapy with azilsartan medoxomil, along with careful ongoing monitoring.
Data regarding overdose with azilsartan medoxomil in humans are limited.[1] In controlled clinical trials, healthy subjects tolerated single daily doses of Edarbi® up to 320 mg for 7 days without significant safety concerns.[1]
In the event of an overdose with azilsartan medoxomil (Edarbi® or Edarbyclor®), management should be symptomatic and supportive, dictated by the patient's clinical status. There is no specific antidote for azilsartan overdose. Azilsartan is not dialyzable, meaning hemodialysis is not effective in removing the drug from the circulation.[1] This is likely due to its high plasma protein binding and pharmacokinetic characteristics. The inability to remove azilsartan via dialysis emphasizes the importance of supportive measures in managing overdose, focusing on maintaining hemodynamic stability and vital functions.
For Edarbyclor®, overdose considerations must also include the chlorthalidone component. Acute overdose with chlorthalidone may manifest as nausea, weakness, dizziness, and significant disturbances of electrolyte balance (e.g., hypokalemia, hyponatremia).[10] Management of chlorthalidone overdose is also supportive. Gastric lavage may be considered if ingestion is recent. Correction of fluid and electrolyte imbalances is crucial, potentially involving intravenous administration of dextrose-saline with potassium, administered cautiously.[10]
Prevention of overdose through appropriate patient education on correct dosing and medication storage (out of reach of children) is paramount. In case of suspected overdose, immediate medical attention should be sought.
Azilsartan medoxomil, as monotherapy (Edarbi®) or in combination with chlorthalidone (Edarbyclor®), has the potential to interact with several other medications. Many of these interactions are class effects common to ARBs or thiazide-like diuretics.
A thorough medication review is essential before initiating azilsartan medoxomil to identify and manage potential drug interactions, thereby optimizing therapeutic outcomes and minimizing the risk of adverse events.
Table 4: Summary of Key Drug Interactions with Azilsartan Medoxomil (Edarbi® and Edarbyclor®)
Interacting Drug/Class | Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Effect | Clinical Consequence | Management Recommendation | Specific Notes for Edarbyclor® | Source Snippet(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Diuretics (High Dose) | Additive volume depletion | Increased risk of symptomatic hypotension | Correct volume depletion or start azilsartan at lower dose (40mg Edarbi®); monitor BP | Chlorthalidone component contributes to volume depletion. | 19 |
Other Antihypertensives | Additive BP lowering | Potential for excessive hypotension | Monitor BP; adjust doses as needed | 10 | |
NSAIDs (incl. COX-2 inhibitors) | Attenuation of antihypertensive effect; inhibition of renal prostaglandin synthesis | Reduced BP control; deterioration of renal function (incl. acute renal failure in at-risk patients) | Monitor BP and renal function periodically | 3 | |
Potassium-Sparing Diuretics, Potassium Supplements, Salt Substitutes with K+ | Additive effect on serum potassium | Hyperkalemia | Monitor serum potassium regularly; use with caution | Chlorthalidone can cause hypokalemia, potentially complicating K+ management if used with K+-sparing agents. | 6 |
Lithium | Decreased renal clearance of lithium | Increased serum lithium concentrations and risk of lithium toxicity | Monitor serum lithium levels frequently; consider lithium dose reduction or avoiding combination | Chlorthalidone also decreases lithium clearance, further increasing risk. | 6 |
Aliskiren | Dual RAAS blockade | Increased risk of hypotension, hyperkalemia, renal impairment | Contraindicated in patients with diabetes (FDA for Edarbi®/Edarbyclor®); Contraindicated in diabetes or renal impairment (GFR <60 mL/min/1.73m²) (EMA for Edarbi®) | Same contraindications apply. | 6 |
ACE Inhibitors / Other ARBs | Dual RAAS blockade | Increased risk of hypotension, hyperkalemia, renal impairment | Generally not recommended | 6 | |
Strong CYP2C9 Inhibitors (e.g., fluconazole - though study showed no significant interaction) | Potential increase in azilsartan exposure (azilsartan is a CYP2C9 substrate) | Potential for increased ARB effects/side effects | Use with caution; monitor. (Fluconazole study showed no clinical significance) | 3 | |
Strong CYP2C9 Inducers (e.g., rifampin) | Potential decrease in azilsartan exposure | Potential for reduced antihypertensive efficacy | Use with caution; monitor BP response | 3 |
The use of azilsartan medoxomil requires careful consideration in several specific patient populations due to potential risks or lack of established safety and efficacy data.
Pregnancy:
Azilsartan medoxomil carries a BOXED WARNING regarding fetal toxicity, a class effect for drugs acting directly on the RAAS.3 Use of these agents during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy can cause significant fetal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Documented adverse outcomes include fetal renal dysfunction leading to oligohydramnios, which can be associated with fetal limb contractures, craniofacial deformation, and hypoplastic lung development. Neonatal complications may include skull hypoplasia, anuria, hypotension, reversible or irreversible renal failure, and death.10
Consequently, azilsartan medoxomil should be discontinued as soon as pregnancy is detected. The EMA recommends against its use in the first trimester and contraindicates it during the second and third trimesters.[6] For Edarbyclor®, the chlorthalidone component also poses risks, as thiazides cross the placental barrier and can cause fetal or neonatal jaundice and thrombocytopenia.[10] Women of childbearing potential must be informed of these risks, and alternative antihypertensive treatments with established safety profiles in pregnancy (e.g., methyldopa, labetalol, nifedipine) should be considered if antihypertensive therapy is required.
Lactation:
It is not definitively known whether azilsartan is excreted in human milk, although it is found in low concentrations in the milk of lactating rats.10 Chlorthalidone, a component of Edarbyclor®, is known to be excreted in human milk.10 Due to the potential for adverse effects on the nursing infant from both components, a decision should be made whether to discontinue breastfeeding or discontinue the drug, taking into account the importance of the medication to the mother. The EMA does not recommend the use of Edarbi® during breastfeeding, preferring alternative treatments with better-established safety profiles, especially for newborns or preterm infants.6
The safety and effectiveness of azilsartan medoxomil (Edarbi®) and azilsartan medoxomil/chlorthalidone (Edarbyclor®) for the treatment of hypertension in pediatric patients (under 18 years of age) have not been established according to FDA labeling.[10] The EMA states that Edarbi® is not indicated for use in children and adolescents under 18 years of age, although some pharmacokinetic data are available for children aged 6 to <18 years; however, no posology recommendation can be made based on this limited data.[6] A single-dose pharmacokinetic study in pediatric patients aged 6 to <16 years has been conducted.[24] Regulatory discussions by the Pediatric Review Committee (PeRC) indicated a waiver for use in infants (<12 months) due to safety concerns and a deferral for studies in older children (12 months to <17 years).[13] This cautious approach reflects the necessity for dedicated pediatric trials to establish appropriate dosing, efficacy, and safety in this population, as adult data cannot be directly extrapolated. Clinicians needing to treat pediatric hypertension with an ARB would typically select agents with more established pediatric indications and dosing guidelines.
According to FDA labeling, no initial dosage adjustment of Edarbi® or Edarbyclor® is routinely recommended for elderly patients.[10] Clinical studies included a significant proportion of elderly patients (24-26% aged 65 or older, and 5-5.7% aged 75 or older for Edarbyclor® and Edarbi® respectively). While no overall differences in safety or effectiveness were observed compared to younger patients, the possibility of greater sensitivity in some older individuals cannot be entirely ruled out.[10] Notably, abnormally high serum creatinine values were reported more frequently in patients aged 75 years or older receiving Edarbi®.[19]
The EMA guidance for Edarbi® also states no initial dose adjustment is necessary for elderly patients but suggests consideration of a lower starting dose of 20 mg in the very elderly (≥75 years), particularly those who may be at increased risk of hypotension.[6] This more conservative approach by the EMA acknowledges the potential for increased drug sensitivity due to age-related physiological changes, such as reduced renal clearance or altered baroreceptor function, and common presence of polypharmacy and comorbidities in this age group. Clinicians should, therefore, individualize dosing in geriatric patients, potentially starting with lower doses if there are concerns about tolerability, especially regarding hypotension or effects on renal function, even if the FDA label does not mandate an initial adjustment for all elderly individuals.
Edarbi® (Azilsartan Medoxomil Monotherapy):
The FDA prescribing information states that no initial dose adjustment is required for patients with mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment, or for those with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing hemodialysis.19 However, it is crucial to monitor for worsening renal function, as ARBs can affect renal hemodynamics.19 Patients with moderate to severe renal impairment were noted to be more likely to report abnormally high serum creatinine values during clinical trials.19 Azilsartan is not removed by hemodialysis 1, meaning dose timing relative to dialysis sessions is not a concern for drug removal, but the underlying renal status still dictates cautious use and diligent monitoring.
The EMA advises caution when using Edarbi® in hypertensive patients with severe renal impairment and ESRD due to a lack of experience in these specific subgroups.[6] Similar to the FDA, no dose adjustment is recommended by the EMA for mild or moderate renal impairment.
Edarbyclor® (Azilsartan Medoxomil/Chlorthalidone):
The use of Edarbyclor® is more restricted in patients with renal impairment due to the chlorthalidone component. Safety and effectiveness have not been established in patients with severe renal impairment (defined as eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m²).10 No dose adjustment is required for patients with mild (eGFR 60-90 mL/min/1.73 m²) or moderate (eGFR 30-60 mL/min/1.73 m²) renal impairment.10 Chlorthalidone may precipitate azotemia in patients with renal disease, and if progressive renal impairment becomes evident, discontinuation of Edarbyclor® should be considered.10
For patients with severe renal impairment or ESRD requiring an ARB, Edarbi® monotherapy might be a more suitable choice than Edarbyclor®, given the limitations associated with chlorthalidone in advanced renal dysfunction. However, all RAAS inhibitors necessitate careful application in patients with any degree of renal impairment due to their mechanism of action influencing renal blood flow and glomerular filtration.
Edarbi® (Azilsartan Medoxomil Monotherapy):
According to FDA labeling, no initial dose adjustment is necessary for subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment.19 However, Edarbi® has not been studied in patients with severe hepatic impairment, and therefore its use in this population is not recommended by the FDA or EMA.6 The EMA suggests that for patients with mild to moderate hepatic impairment, close monitoring is recommended, and consideration should be given to a 20 mg starting dose.6 This more cautious EMA stance reflects that the liver (via CYP2C9) is involved in azilsartan's metabolism, and hepatic impairment could alter drug metabolism and protein binding, potentially increasing systemic exposure.
Edarbyclor® (Azilsartan Medoxomil/Chlorthalidone):
For the azilsartan medoxomil component, no dose adjustment is necessary for mild or moderate hepatic impairment. Edarbyclor® has not been studied in patients with severe hepatic impairment.10 The chlorthalidone component warrants caution, as minor alterations of fluid and electrolyte balance induced by thiazide-like diuretics may precipitate hepatic coma in patients with impaired hepatic function or progressive liver disease.10
Given these considerations, close monitoring for adverse effects is prudent in patients with any degree of hepatic impairment receiving azilsartan medoxomil, and the EMA's recommendation for a lower starting dose of Edarbi® in mild to moderate cases appears to be a reasonable precaution. Use in severe hepatic impairment should generally be avoided due to lack of data and potential risks.
The dosage of azilsartan medoxomil must be individualized based on the specific product (Edarbi® or Edarbyclor®), the patient's clinical response, and certain patient characteristics.
Edarbi® (Azilsartan Medoxomil Monotherapy):
The availability of an 80 mg strength as a standard effective dose, which has demonstrated superior blood pressure lowering compared to maximum doses of some other ARBs in clinical trials, positions Edarbi® as a potent option. This may allow for more rapid achievement of blood pressure goals in appropriate patients. The flexibility to start at 40 mg (or 20 mg per EMA guidance in certain cases) allows for careful titration and individualization of therapy, particularly in patients at higher risk for initial hypotensive effects.
Edarbyclor® (Azilsartan Medoxomil/Chlorthalidone Fixed-Dose Combination):
Near-maximal antihypertensive effect with Edarbi® is typically seen within 2 weeks, with maximal effects achieved by 4 weeks.[6] For Edarbyclor®, most of the antihypertensive effect is apparent within 1 to 2 weeks.[10]
Table 5: Dosage Recommendations for Azilsartan Medoxomil (Edarbi® and Edarbyclor®) including Adjustments for Specific Populations and Drug Interactions.
Product | Indication | Standard Adult Starting Dose | Standard Adult Maintenance/Max Dose | Geriatric Considerations/Adjustments | Renal Impairment Adjustments | Hepatic Impairment Adjustments | Key Drug Interaction Adjustments | Source Snippet(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Edarbi® | Hypertension | FDA: 80 mg once daily (consider 40 mg if on high-dose diuretics/volume depleted). EMA: 40 mg once daily. | FDA: 80 mg once daily. EMA: Max 80 mg once daily. | FDA: No initial adjustment. EMA: Consider 20 mg starting dose if ≥75 years. | FDA: No initial adjustment for mild-severe or ESRD. Monitor. EMA: No adjustment for mild-moderate. Caution in severe/ESRD (no experience). Not dialyzable. | FDA: No initial adjustment for mild-moderate. Not studied in severe. EMA: Consider 20 mg starting dose for mild-moderate; monitor. Not recommended in severe. | High-dose diuretics: Start Edarbi® 40 mg. | 1 |
Edarbyclor® | Hypertension | FDA: 40 mg/12.5 mg once daily. | FDA: Max 40 mg/25 mg once daily. | FDA: No initial adjustment. | FDA: No adjustment for mild-moderate (eGFR 30-90). Not established in severe (eGFR <30). Monitor. Chlorthalidone may precipitate azotemia. | FDA: No adjustment for mild-moderate (azilsartan component). Not studied in severe. Chlorthalidone: caution, may precipitate hepatic coma. | High-dose diuretics / Volume depletion: Correct prior to Edarbyclor® initiation. | 9 |
This table provides a consolidated overview of dosing recommendations for Edarbi® and Edarbyclor®, facilitating quick reference for prescribers. It highlights the standard dosing, considerations for specific populations like the elderly or those with organ impairment, and adjustments needed in the context of certain drug interactions (primarily diuretic use affecting starting dose for Edarbi®). The differences in guidance between the FDA and EMA, particularly for geriatric and hepatically impaired patients receiving Edarbi®, underscore the importance of consulting region-specific prescribing information while also applying clinical judgment.
Both Edarbi® and Edarbyclor® are administered orally, once daily.[3] A key convenience for patients is that these medications can be taken with or without food, as food does not significantly affect the bioavailability of azilsartan.[3] This flexibility can improve patient adherence to the prescribed regimen.
Edarbi® (Azilsartan Medoxomil):
Edarbi® is supplied as white to nearly white, round, oral tablets in two strengths 6:
Edarbyclor® (Azilsartan Medoxomil and Chlorthalidone):
Edarbyclor® is supplied as oral tablets containing fixed combinations of azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone in the following strengths 10:
Edarbi®:
Edarbyclor®:
Knowledge of excipients is important for identifying potential allergens or intolerances in susceptible patients. The inclusion of specific excipients, such as mannitol (an osmotic agent) and pH-modifying agents like fumaric acid and sodium hydroxide, suggests deliberate formulation strategies. These are likely employed to ensure the stability of the active pharmaceutical ingredients and to achieve appropriate dissolution characteristics, which are critical for consistent drug bioavailability and therapeutic effect. For instance, patent US9066936 related to Edarbi® mentions the use of a "pH control agent" to enhance stability and dissolution.[40] Such formulation details are often part of the proprietary knowledge protecting the branded product and can influence the development and characteristics of generic versions.
Proper storage and handling are essential to maintain the quality and efficacy of azilsartan medoxomil formulations.
Edarbi®:
Edarbyclor®:
Azilsartan Medoxomil Drug Substance:
The bulk drug substance, azilsartan medoxomil powder, has more stringent storage recommendations to maintain its stability over extended periods. Recommended storage conditions for the powder are -20°C for up to 3 years or 4°C for up to 2 years. If dissolved in a solvent, storage at -80°C is recommended for up to 2 years, or -20°C for up to 1 year.44 The substance is considered stable under these recommended storage conditions but should be kept away from direct sunlight and sources of ignition.44 These differing storage requirements for the bulk substance versus the formulated tablet highlight the role of pharmaceutical formulation in enhancing drug stability for practical patient use at room temperature.
Patients should be counseled on the importance of proper storage to ensure the medication remains effective and safe throughout its shelf life. Pharmacies should also adhere to these storage conditions, particularly the need for light- and moisture-resistant containers if any dispensing outside the original manufacturer packaging occurs, although original container dispensing is preferred.
The commercial availability and pricing of azilsartan medoxomil are influenced by patent protection and regulatory exclusivities.
Edarbi® (Azilsartan Medoxomil Monotherapy):
Several U.S. patents protect various aspects of Edarbi®. Key patents include:
Based on the combination of these patents and any applicable regulatory exclusivities, the estimated generic launch date for Edarbi® in the U.S. was projected to be around March 26, 2028.[41] The staggered expiration of patents covering the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), methods of use, and specific formulations creates a complex intellectual property landscape. Formulation patents, such as US9066936, can extend market protection for the branded product beyond the expiration of the primary substance patent, a common life-cycle management strategy employed by pharmaceutical innovators.
Edarbyclor® (Azilsartan Medoxomil/Chlorthalidone):
The fixed-dose combination product Edarbyclor® is also protected by a portfolio of patents, including some shared with Edarbi® (e.g., US7157584, US7572920, US9066936) and others specific to the combination or its formulation/use:
These later-expiring patents for Edarbyclor® suggest a potentially longer period of brand market exclusivity for the combination product compared to the monotherapy.
The availability of generic versions can significantly impact drug costs and patient access.
Edarbi® (Azilsartan Medoxomil Monotherapy):
As of early 2025, there was no therapeutically equivalent generic version of Edarbi® (azilsartan medoxomil) marketed in the United States.40 While at least one generic manufacturer had filed an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) for azilsartan medoxomil 41, the launch of a generic was contingent upon patent expirations and resolution of any patent challenges. The FDA Orange Book lists azilsartan medoxomil as an active ingredient 2, but specific marketed generics were not confirmed by all sources for this timeframe.
Edarbyclor® (Azilsartan Medoxomil/Chlorthalidone):
A generic version of Edarbyclor® has received FDA approval. Specifically, Azilsartan Medoxomil and Chlorthalidone tablets, manufactured by Alkem Laboratories Ltd., were approved by the FDA on January 21, 2025, in strengths of 40 mg/12.5 mg and 40 mg/25 mg.45 Some sources indicated a launch date concurrent with the approval.46 However, it is important to note that FDA approval of a generic does not always guarantee immediate market availability, as this can be influenced by remaining patent protections, regulatory exclusivities, or commercial decisions by the generic manufacturer.45 The approval of a generic for the combination product Edarbyclor® potentially ahead of a widely marketed generic for the Edarbi® monotherapy presents an interesting market dynamic, possibly influenced by differing patent landscapes or strategic priorities of generic companies. The availability of generic Edarbyclor® is anticipated to reduce costs and improve access to this specific fixed-dose combination therapy.
Azilsartan medoxomil (Edarbi®) and its combination product with chlorthalidone (Edarbyclor®) were originally developed by Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.[7]
In the United States, the current marketer for both Edarbi® and Edarbyclor® is Azurity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (previously Arbor Pharmaceuticals, LLC, a subsidiary of Azurity Pharmaceuticals, Inc.).[11] Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited retains the trademarks for Edarbi® and Edarbyclor®, which are used under license by Azurity Pharmaceuticals in the U.S. market.[52] Such licensing and marketing agreements are common in the pharmaceutical industry, allowing originator companies to partner with other firms that may have specialized commercialization capabilities in certain regions or at different stages of a product's lifecycle.
The approved generic version of Edarbyclor® (Azilsartan Medoxomil and Chlorthalidone tablets) is manufactured by Alkem Laboratories Ltd..[45]
Azilsartan medoxomil represents a potent and effective therapeutic option within the angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) class for the management of hypertension. Its primary therapeutic benefit lies in its robust and sustained 24-hour blood pressure-lowering capacity. Clinical trial evidence consistently demonstrates that azilsartan medoxomil, particularly at the 80 mg daily dose, provides statistically significant and clinically meaningful reductions in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure, often superior to those achieved with maximum approved doses of other established ARBs like valsartan and olmesartan, as well as the ACE inhibitor ramipril.[3] This superior antihypertensive efficacy is attributed to the unique pharmacological properties of its active moiety, azilsartan, which include high selectivity for the AT1 receptor, insurmountable antagonism, and a slow dissociation rate from the receptor, leading to a prolonged duration of action.[1]
Azilsartan medoxomil is effective as monotherapy and demonstrates additive blood pressure reduction when used in combination with other antihypertensive agents, notably with the thiazide-like diuretic chlorthalidone in the fixed-dose combination Edarbyclor®.[3] The convenience of once-daily oral administration, which can be taken with or without food, further enhances its utility and potential for patient adherence.[3]
In terms of risks, azilsartan medoxomil is generally well-tolerated. The most common adverse effect reported with monotherapy is diarrhea, though its overall adverse event profile is similar to placebo.[3] The combination product Edarbyclor® carries additional risks associated with chlorthalidone, such as dizziness, fatigue, and potential electrolyte disturbances like hypokalemia and hyperuricemia.[10]
The most significant risk associated with azilsartan medoxomil, as with all drugs acting on the RAAS, is the boxed warning regarding fetal toxicity. It is contraindicated in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy and should be discontinued immediately if pregnancy is detected.[2] Other important warnings include the potential for symptomatic hypotension (especially in volume- or salt-depleted patients), impaired renal function (particularly in susceptible individuals or with dual RAAS blockade), and hyperkalemia (especially with concomitant potassium-sparing agents or in renal impairment). Angioedema, though rare, is a serious class effect. Clinically significant drug interactions primarily involve NSAIDs (risk of renal impairment and reduced antihypertensive effect), lithium (increased toxicity risk), and dual RAAS blockade with ACE inhibitors or aliskiren (contraindicated in diabetic patients).[3]
Azilsartan medoxomil has established itself as a highly effective agent for blood pressure reduction. Its superior antihypertensive efficacy compared to some other ARBs and ramipril, particularly in achieving 24-hour blood pressure control, makes it a valuable option for initiating therapy or for patients whose blood pressure is inadequately controlled with other agents. The fixed-dose combination with chlorthalidone (Edarbyclor®) further enhances its utility by providing a potent two-drug regimen in a single tablet, leveraging the benefits of a long-acting diuretic with strong evidence for cardiovascular protection.
While the potent blood pressure lowering achieved by azilsartan medoxomil is expected to translate into a reduction in cardiovascular events (a class benefit of effective antihypertensives), it is important to acknowledge the lack of dedicated large-scale cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) specifically for azilsartan medoxomil that directly demonstrate reductions in myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death.[8] For specific high-risk populations where other ARBs have demonstrated benefits in dedicated CVOTs (e.g., certain heart failure or post-MI settings), those agents with direct outcome evidence may continue to be preferred. The potential off-label uses of azilsartan medoxomil in conditions like heart failure, post-MI, or diabetic nephropathy remain largely speculative or based on class effects, requiring further dedicated clinical investigation to define its role.[1] Promising findings on surrogate markers like blood pressure variability and arterial stiffness [32] may warrant further exploration in outcome-driven studies.
Future perspectives for azilsartan medoxomil could involve conducting such dedicated CVOTs to solidify its place in cardiovascular risk reduction beyond blood pressure control alone, particularly in comparison to or in combination with newer therapeutic classes. Research into its effects on specific renal outcomes in diabetic and non-diabetic kidney disease could also expand its therapeutic profile. The recent approval of a generic version of Edarbyclor® [45] and the anticipated future availability of generic Edarbi® will likely increase accessibility and may influence prescribing patterns.
In conclusion, azilsartan medoxomil is a potent and well-tolerated ARB that offers significant advantages in blood pressure reduction. Its careful use, with attention to its safety profile, contraindications, and potential drug interactions, allows clinicians to effectively manage hypertension in a broad range of adult patients. Continued pharmacovigilance and further research may yet expand its documented benefits and applications in cardiovascular medicine.
Published at: May 16, 2025
This report is continuously updated as new research emerges.