Small Molecule
C19H18O9
118159-48-1
Bicyclol, identified by DrugBank Accession Number DB16014, is a synthetic small molecule pharmaceutical agent.[1] It originates from a lignan component of Schisandra chinensis (Wuweizi), a medicinal herb with a long history of use in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). Specifically, Bicyclol is a synthetic derivative of Schisandrin C, one of the dibenzocyclooctadiene lignans found in the fruit of Schisandra chinensis.[3] This derivation represents a notable example of drug development that bridges traditional medicinal knowledge with modern synthetic chemistry and rigorous pharmacological evaluation.
The primary therapeutic application of Bicyclol lies in its significant hepatoprotective properties. It has been extensively utilized in clinical practice in China for the management of a variety of liver disorders.[3] Its designation as an "innovative chemical drug with proprietary intellectual property rights in China" [4] underscores its importance within the national pharmaceutical landscape and its contribution to addressing the burden of liver diseases.
A key area of contemporary clinical investigation for Bicyclol is its efficacy in the treatment of acute drug-induced liver injury (DILI). It is the subject of a significant clinical trial, registered as NCT02944552 and titled "The Multi Center, Randomized, Double-blind, Positive Controlled Study of Bicyclol in the Treatment of Acute DILI".[2] The outcomes of this trial are pivotal in establishing an evidence-based role for Bicyclol in this specific and challenging clinical indication.
The origin of Bicyclol from Schisandrin C, a constituent of a traditional remedy, is a critical aspect of its profile. This heritage may have informed initial perceptions of its safety and provided a rationale for its development as an agent with liver-protective capabilities. Its status as an "innovative" drug within China reflects a successful translation of knowledge derived from traditional sources into a standardized, modern therapeutic entity.
The developmental trajectory of Bicyclol, from a component of a TCM herb to a synthesized and pharmacologically characterized drug, exemplifies a significant and growing trend in global pharmaceutical research. This trend involves the scientific validation, standardization, and optimization of compounds derived from traditional medicinal practices. Such an approach allows for the systematic exploration of empirical therapeutic knowledge accumulated over centuries, while ensuring that candidate drugs meet contemporary standards of efficacy, safety, and manufacturing quality. The synthesis of a derivative like Bicyclol from a natural product lead (Schisandrin C) facilitates structural modifications aimed at enhancing desirable pharmacological properties, such as increased potency, improved stability, or a more favorable pharmacokinetic profile, and also enables the establishment of intellectual property. This process effectively creates a synergistic fusion between traditional empirical wisdom and the methodologies of modern science, including chemistry, pharmacology, and clinical trial design. This dual heritage may not only facilitate Bicyclol's acceptance within healthcare systems that are familiar with or integrate TCM but also provides the necessary chemical and pharmacological foundation for rigorous scientific scrutiny by global regulatory authorities and the international medical community. Furthermore, it suggests that traditional pharmacopoeias continue to represent a valuable and largely untapped reservoir for the discovery of novel therapeutic agents.
The "proprietary intellectual property rights in China" [4] associated with Bicyclol, in conjunction with its approval by the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) and its established clinical use, may indicate a deliberate national pharmaceutical strategy. This strategy appears to focus on the development and commercialization of novel drugs that are rooted in China's unique and extensive heritage of traditional medicine. Such a focus could aim not only to serve the domestic healthcare market but also to pave the way for international expansion, contingent upon meeting the rigorous regulatory requirements of Western and other international authorities. This approach of leveraging a rich traditional medicine resource for modern drug development, securing national intellectual property, and achieving domestic market success could represent a defined pathway for Chinese pharmaceutical companies to cultivate a distinctive portfolio of innovative therapeutic agents. If this model proves successful and is replicated, it could lead to an increasing number of TCM-derived drug candidates entering global research and development pipelines. This, in turn, has the potential to diversify the global pharmaceutical landscape and, in certain therapeutic areas, offer new solutions, provided that clinical efficacy and safety are robustly demonstrated according to internationally accepted scientific and ethical standards.
Bicyclol's physicochemical properties are detailed in Table 1, which summarizes key parameters influencing its pharmaceutical behavior, formulation, and biological interactions.
The relatively low aqueous solubility of Bicyclol (0.271 mg/mL) is a significant biopharmaceutical consideration for an orally administered drug.[2] For effective oral absorption, a drug must typically dissolve in the aqueous environment of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Limited aqueous solubility can lead to slow or incomplete dissolution, potentially resulting in suboptimal or variable bioavailability. This characteristic often classifies drugs as Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) Class II (low solubility, high permeability) or Class IV (low solubility, low permeability). The challenges posed by Bicyclol's solubility are directly addressed in pharmaceutical development. For instance, patent information [9] explicitly describes Bicyclol as a "slightly soluble drug" and details the use of micronization techniques—reducing particle size to increase surface area—as a strategy to improve its dissolution rate and, consequently, its bioavailability. Furthermore, the development of more sophisticated dosage forms, such as osmotic pump controlled-release tablets [10], also signifies efforts to optimize the delivery and absorption profile of Bicyclol, overcoming the limitations imposed by its inherent physicochemical properties. This highlights the critical interplay between a drug's intrinsic characteristics and the formulation science necessary to translate it into a clinically effective therapeutic product.
Table 1: Summary of Physicochemical Properties of Bicyclol
Parameter | Value(s) or Description | Source Snippet(s) |
---|---|---|
Molecular Formula | C19H18O9 | 2 |
Average Molecular Weight | 390.344 g/mol (390.34 g/mol) | 2 |
Monoisotopic Molecular Weight | 390.09508216 g/mol | 2 |
CAS Number | 118159-48-1 | 7 |
Physical Form | Solid; Crystalline solid | 7 |
Color | White | 7 |
Purity Range | ≥98%; 99.84% (research grade) | 7 |
Water Solubility (ALOGPS predicted) | 0.271 mg/mL | 2 |
DMSO Solubility | 100 mg/mL (256.19 mM; requires ultrasonic) | 7 |
LogP (Lipophilicity) | 1.55 (ALOGPS); 1.79 (Chemaxon) | 2 |
LogS (Aqueous Solubility, ALOGPS) | -3.2 | 2 |
pKa (Strongest Acidic, Chemaxon) | 15.03 | 2 |
pKa (Strongest Basic, Chemaxon) | -2.8 | 2 |
Polar Surface Area (PSA, Chemaxon) | 101.91 Ų | 2 |
Rotatable Bond Count (Chemaxon) | 5 | 2 |
Hydrogen Bond Donor Count (Chemaxon) | 1 | 2 |
Hydrogen Bond Acceptor Count (Chemaxon) | 8 | 2 |
Predicted Oral Bioavailability (Chemaxon) | 1 (qualitative, suggests good potential) | 2 |
Lipinski's Rule of Five Compliance | Yes | 2 |
Recommended Powder Storage | -20°C (3 years); 4°C (2 years) | 7 |
λmax (UV Absorption) | 211, 228, 273 nm | 8 |
These properties are fundamental for drug formulation, understanding its behavior in biological systems (e.g., membrane permeability suggested by LogP and PSA), ensuring stability during storage, and predicting its potential for oral absorption. The positive "Rule of Five" compliance and the Chemaxon prediction of good oral bioavailability are consistent with its clinical use via the oral route. However, the "No" for Veber's Rule might suggest some potential limitations related to molecular flexibility or polar surface area that could affect oral bioavailability, though other indicators are favorable.
Bicyclol exerts its therapeutic effects through a complex and multifaceted mechanism of action, primarily centered on robust hepatoprotection. Its pharmacological activities encompass antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-fibrotic, antiviral, and cell-regulatory pathways, contributing to its efficacy in various liver pathologies.
Several key mechanisms contribute to Bicyclol's liver-protective effects:
Bicyclol demonstrates significant anti-fibrotic effects in various preclinical models of liver fibrosis:
Bicyclol also possesses antiviral properties, particularly against the Hepatitis B Virus (HBV):
Beyond its broad phenomenological effects, research has begun to identify specific molecular targets and signaling pathways modulated by Bicyclol:
The pleiotropic mechanism of action of Bicyclol, encompassing antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, autophagy-modulating, HSP-inducing, anti-fibrotic, and antiviral activities, underpins its efficacy across a spectrum of liver diseases. These diseases, while having diverse etiologies, often share common underlying pathological processes such as oxidative stress, chronic inflammation, and unregulated cell death. The identification of specific molecular targets like HSP70 and PKC, and the modulation of defined signaling pathways such as Nrf2, NF-κB, MyD88, and IL-6/STAT3, provide a more granular and sophisticated understanding of Bicyclol's pharmacological effects. This moves the comprehension of its action beyond general descriptions of "hepatoprotection" towards a more precise molecular pharmacology.
While this multifaceted MOA is a pharmacological strength, enabling Bicyclol to address complex diseases with multiple pathogenic drivers (e.g., DILI, NAFLD), it could also present intricacies in the context of regulatory evaluation, particularly in jurisdictions that often favor drugs with a single, highly specific, and unequivocally defined mechanism. Such specificity can simplify the understanding of dose-response relationships, target engagement, and the prediction of off-target effects. Consequently, the very breadth of Bicyclol's MOA, while therapeutically advantageous, might contribute to the complexities in achieving regulatory approval outside of China, where regulatory philosophies or data expectations for mechanistic elucidation may differ. It also makes it challenging to definitively attribute the observed clinical efficacy in any single disease state to one predominant mechanistic component.
However, the progressively detailed elucidation of Bicyclol's interactions with specific molecular entities, such as its binding to MyD88 in the context of ALI [16] and its inhibition of the IL-6/STAT3 pathway in advanced liver disease [15], may signify a strategic evolution in its research and development. This approach could serve to re-characterize Bicyclol for novel, more defined indications or to satisfy the more stringent mechanistic data requirements of global regulatory bodies. By focusing on these specific molecular interactions, researchers can build a stronger, more targeted rationale for Bicyclol's use in particular diseases. This could also pave the way for the development of analogues with potentially enhanced selectivity or potency for these specific targets. This evolution in mechanistic understanding, moving beyond its traditional classification as a general "hepatoprotective" agent, could be instrumental in unlocking Bicyclol's full therapeutic potential across a wider spectrum of diseases. Furthermore, providing such detailed molecular insights could be crucial for satisfying the rigorous data expectations of international regulatory agencies, potentially facilitating broader regulatory acceptance if these specific mechanisms are robustly and unequivocally linked to clinical outcomes in well-designed, internationally recognized clinical trials.
The pharmacokinetic profile of Bicyclol, encompassing its absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME), is crucial for understanding its clinical use, dosing regimens, and potential for drug interactions.
Bicyclol is reported to exhibit high oral bioavailability.[3] This is a favorable characteristic for an orally administered drug, suggesting efficient absorption from the gastrointestinal tract. To further understand and optimize its absorption characteristics, particularly for different formulations, physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling has been employed. One study aimed to construct PBPK models for Bicyclol immediate-release (IR) and controlled-release (CR) tablets in beagle dogs, as well as a PBPK model for IR tablets in humans, to predict absorption profiles.[10] As noted earlier (Section 2.3), Bicyclol is described as a "slightly soluble drug." To address this, pharmaceutical strategies such as micronization have been developed to improve its dissolution rate and thereby enhance its oral bioavailability, as detailed in patent CN103284953A.[9]
Specific quantitative parameters regarding the distribution of Bicyclol in humans, such as its volume of distribution or plasma protein binding characteristics, are not detailed in the provided source materials.
Bicyclol undergoes significant metabolism, primarily mediated by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme system. The main enzymes responsible for its metabolism are reported to be CYP3A and CYP2E1.3 This information is critical for predicting potential drug-drug interactions with other medications that are substrates, inhibitors, or inducers of these CYP isoforms.
Recent research has identified two active metabolites of Bicyclol, designated M2 and M3.18 The pharmacological activity of these metabolites could contribute to the overall therapeutic effect or side effect profile of Bicyclol. A novel synthetic route for these metabolites has been developed to facilitate their production in sufficient quantities for drug-drug interaction studies.18
The specific routes and extent of elimination of Bicyclol and its metabolites from the human body (e.g., renal vs. fecal excretion) are not detailed in the provided source materials.
A study was conducted to develop a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for the quantification of Bicyclol in human plasma. This validated method was subsequently applied to investigate the pharmacokinetics of Bicyclol tablets following oral administration to six healthy Chinese volunteers.[19] However, the abstract of this study does not provide specific pharmacokinetic parameters such as maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), time to reach Cmax (Tmax), area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), or elimination half-life (t1/2) in these human subjects.[19]
It is noted that the immediate-release (IR) formulation of Bicyclol has a short elimination half-life, which necessitates multiple daily doses to maintain therapeutic concentrations. This dosing inconvenience, particularly for patients with chronic conditions requiring long-term administration, prompted the development of controlled-release (CR) tablet formulations designed to prolong drug release and reduce dosing frequency.[10] The PBPK model for Bicyclol IR tablets in humans was constructed as part of this development effort, but specific output parameters from this model are not available in the provided snippets.[10]
Critical Note: Information from snippets [32] (detailing pharmacokinetics of Mirabegron) and [33] (detailing pharmacokinetics of Tofacitinib) is irrelevant to Bicyclol and has not been incorporated here.
The potential for Bicyclol to engage in drug-drug interactions has been investigated:
Understanding Bicyclol's ADME profile is essential for optimizing its clinical use, including dose regimen design, predicting its behavior in diverse patient populations, and anticipating potential drug-drug interactions. The reported high oral bioavailability is an advantageous characteristic. Its metabolism primarily by CYP3A and CYP2E1 is a key piece of information, as these enzymes are involved in the metabolism of many other drugs, creating a potential for interactions. The short half-life of the IR formulation is a significant clinical consideration that has driven further pharmaceutical development.
The concerted efforts in developing controlled-release (CR) formulations of Bicyclol [10] and employing sophisticated PBPK modeling [10] signify a mature stage of pharmaceutical development. These endeavors are aimed directly at overcoming the clinical limitation posed by the short elimination half-life observed with immediate-release Bicyclol. A short half-life often necessitates frequent dosing, which can be inconvenient for patients and may lead to issues with adherence, especially in the context of chronic diseases requiring long-term therapy. CR formulations are designed to prolong drug release, thereby reducing dosing frequency, improving patient compliance, and potentially providing more stable therapeutic drug concentrations over the dosing interval, which can lead to more consistent efficacy and a better safety profile. PBPK modeling is a powerful computational tool used in modern drug development to simulate and predict pharmacokinetic profiles, aiding in the optimization of formulations and dosing regimens, particularly when transitioning from IR to CR formulations or extrapolating data from animal models to humans. The investment in these advanced pharmaceutical technologies indicates that Bicyclol is considered a valuable therapeutic agent for which pharmacokinetic optimization is being actively pursued to enhance its overall clinical utility and patient acceptability.
Furthermore, the identification and ongoing synthesis of Bicyclol's active metabolites, M2 and M3, for the specific purpose of conducting drug-drug interaction studies [18], reflects a proactive and thorough approach to understanding the complete pharmacological and safety profile of the drug. This is important because metabolites can themselves be pharmacologically active, contributing to the overall therapeutic effect or to adverse drug reactions, and they may also possess their own potential for DDIs, independent of the parent drug. Regulatory agencies worldwide are increasingly focused on the characterization of active metabolites as part of the comprehensive safety and efficacy assessment of new drug candidates. Therefore, investigating the DDI potential of not only Bicyclol itself but also its active forms demonstrates a commitment to a rigorous drug development process. This level of detail aims to preemptively identify and address potential safety concerns related to DDIs, which is crucial for robust regulatory submissions and for ensuring patient safety in complex polypharmacy scenarios.
Table 2: Summary of Human Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of Bicyclol (Qualitative & Limited Quantitative Data from Provided Sources)
Parameter | Description/Data | Source Snippet(s) |
---|---|---|
Oral Bioavailability | Reported as high (qualitative) | 3 |
Metabolism Enzymes | Primarily CYP3A and CYP2E1 | 3 |
Active Metabolites | M2 and M3 identified; being synthesized for DDI studies | 18 |
Half-life Characteristic (IR Formulation) | Short, requiring multiple daily doses | 10 |
Human PK Parameters (Cmax, Tmax, AUC, t1/2) | Investigated in healthy Chinese volunteers using LC-MS/MS, but specific quantitative values are not provided in the available abstracts. PBPK models for IR tablets in humans constructed. | 10 |
Key Drug-Drug Interaction Information | Potential for in vitro interactions with CYP3A/2E1 substrates/inhibitors. Clinically significant DDIs predicted to be less likely with some tested drugs (e.g., pioglitazone in vivo in rats). Contradictory general statement of "no obvious drug interactions." | 12 |
Note: Specific quantitative human pharmacokinetic parameters such as Cmax, Tmax, AUC, and precise elimination half-life values are largely absent in the provided source materials.
Pharmacodynamics describes the biochemical and physiological effects of drugs on the body, the mechanisms of drug action, and the relationship between drug concentration and effect. For Bicyclol, pharmacodynamic effects are primarily observed through its impact on liver biomarkers and its therapeutic actions in specific liver conditions.
A consistent and prominent pharmacodynamic effect of Bicyclol is the significant improvement in liver function biomarkers, particularly serum aminotransferases:
The pharmacodynamic actions of Bicyclol translate into measurable therapeutic benefits in various liver diseases:
The consistent observation of ALT reduction by Bicyclol across multiple etiologies of liver injury—including DILI from various drugs, statin-induced liver injury, liver damage associated with viral hepatitis, and NAFLD—is a significant pharmacodynamic characteristic. This broad efficacy suggests that Bicyclol's mechanism of action is likely targeted at common downstream pathways of hepatocyte damage rather than a single, disease-specific upstream molecular defect. Different liver diseases, despite their distinct primary causes (e.g., specific drugs, viral infections, metabolic dysregulation), often converge on shared pathological mechanisms at the cellular level. These common pathways frequently involve oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis, all of which lead to hepatocyte membrane damage and the leakage of intracellular enzymes like ALT into the bloodstream. Given that Bicyclol's established MOA includes potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects, as well as modulation of apoptosis and autophagy [3], its ability to lower ALT across diverse conditions likely stems from its capacity to interfere with these terminal pathways of liver cell injury. This makes Bicyclol a versatile hepatoprotective agent with potential utility in a wide array of liver insults.
Furthermore, the research findings in the context of NAFLD and NASH, particularly the preclinical data showing Bicyclol's positive effects on hepatic lipid metabolism and insulin resistance [23], point towards a potentially deeper and more systemic metabolic modulatory role for the drug. This extends beyond the symptomatic relief indicated by the normalization of liver enzyme elevations. NAFLD and NASH are fundamentally metabolic diseases where liver damage is a consequence of underlying metabolic dysregulation, including insulin resistance and abnormal lipid handling. In such conditions, merely reducing ALT levels might not fully address the root causes of the disease or halt its progression. Bicyclol's observed effects on lipid accumulation in the liver and its improvement of insulin signaling parameters in preclinical models suggest that it might be targeting these core pathophysiological drivers. If these metabolic modulatory effects are substantiated in human clinical trials for NAFLD/NASH, Bicyclol could be positioned as more than just a "liver protector." It could potentially act as a disease-modifying agent, capable of addressing the fundamental metabolic derangements of these conditions, thereby offering the prospect of preventing progression to more severe stages such as advanced fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma.
The clinical utility of Bicyclol has been evaluated in various hepatic conditions, with a particular focus on Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI). Its efficacy is supported by data from randomized controlled trials and observational studies.
Bicyclol has emerged as a significant therapeutic option for acute DILI, underscored by the findings of a key clinical trial and other supporting studies.
This pivotal trial is central to understanding Bicyclol's role in acute DILI. Key details and findings are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3: Key Findings from Clinical Trial NCT02944552 for Bicyclol in Acute DILI
Aspect | Details | Source Snippet(s) |
---|---|---|
Trial Title | The Multi Center, Randomized, Double-blind, Positive Controlled Study of Bicyclol in the Treatment of Acute DILI | 2 |
Status | Completed Phase 2 | 5 |
Study Design | Multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, double-dummy, active-controlled (polyene phosphatidylcholine as control), superiority trial | 6 |
Patient Population | 241 patients with idiosyncratic acute DILI included in the full analysis set | 6 |
Treatment Arms/Doses | Randomized 1:1:1 to: <br> - Low-dose Bicyclol: 25 mg TID (n=81) <br> - High-dose Bicyclol: 50 mg TID (n=82) <br> - Control: Polyene phosphatidylcholine (PPC) (dose not specified, but other studies use 456 mg TID) (n=78) | 6 |
Primary Endpoint | Decrease from baseline in serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels at post-treatment for 4 weeks | 6 |
Key Efficacy Results - ALT Reduction | Significant ALT decrease in all groups. Greater reduction in Bicyclol groups: <br> - Low-dose Bicyclol: −249.2±151.1 U/L <br> - High-dose Bicyclol: −273.6±203.1 U/L <br> - Control (PPC): −180.8±218.2 U/L <br> (Both Bicyclol groups vs. control: p<0.001) | 6 |
Key Efficacy Results - ALT Normalization Rates | Significantly higher ALT normalization rates at weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 in both Bicyclol groups compared to the control group (p=0.002 at week 1; all p<0.001 at weeks 2, 4, 6, 8 respectively) | 6 |
Key Efficacy Results - Median Time to ALT Normalization | Low-dose Bicyclol: 29 days <br> High-dose Bicyclol: 16 days <br> Control (PPC): 43 days | 6 |
Safety and Tolerability Conclusion | Adverse events, serious adverse events, and adverse drug reactions were similar across the three treatment groups. Bicyclol (25 mg and 50 mg TID) appeared safe. | 6 |
Overall Efficacy Conclusion | Bicyclol (25 mg and 50 mg TID) appeared efficacious for treating idiosyncratic acute DILI, with Bicyclol 50 mg TID showing higher efficacy. | 6 |
The NCT02944552 trial provides robust, controlled evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of Bicyclol in the treatment of acute DILI. The demonstration of superiority over an active control (polyene phosphatidylcholine) is a particularly strong finding, suggesting Bicyclol offers a more effective therapeutic intervention for this condition. The use of an active comparator in this trial, as well as in the trial for statin-induced DILI [22], represents a more rigorous assessment of Bicyclol's efficacy than a comparison against placebo alone would provide. Successfully demonstrating superiority, or at least non-inferiority, to an existing therapy significantly strengthens the clinical value proposition of a drug. In this case, Bicyclol's superior performance in ALT reduction and achieving faster normalization times [6] suggests it may offer a tangible clinical advantage over at least one other commonly used hepatoprotective agent for DILI, thereby justifying its inclusion in treatment guidelines where it is available.
The significantly faster median time to ALT normalization observed with high-dose Bicyclol (50 mg TID), which was 16 days, compared to 29 days for low-dose Bicyclol and 43 days for the polyene phosphatidylcholine control group in the NCT02944552 trial [6], carries important clinical and pharmacoeconomic implications. A 27-day difference in median normalization time compared to the active control is substantial. Faster normalization of liver enzymes often correlates with a more rapid clinical recovery from acute liver injury. This can translate into shorter durations of symptoms, a reduced need for intensive supportive care, and potentially shorter hospital stays for patients who require inpatient management. Beyond the biochemical improvement, such rapid action could lead to significant benefits for patient quality of life and could also reduce overall healthcare resource utilization and associated costs. These factors suggest that the higher dose of Bicyclol (50 mg TID), despite a potentially higher daily drug cost, might be a more compelling and cost-effective option in the management of acute DILI. This should be a pertinent consideration for treatment guidelines and future pharmacoeconomic analyses.
Further evidence supporting Bicyclol's role in DILI comes from a large retrospective analysis using a nationwide inpatient database in China (DILI-R). This study involved 25,927 DILI patients, from which 86 matched pairs were created using propensity score matching to compare Bicyclol treatment with a control group.11 The results showed that the ALT normalization rate in the Bicyclol group was significantly higher than that in the control group (50.00% vs. 24.42%).20 This real-world evidence analysis concluded that Bicyclol is a potential candidate for DILI treatment. Importantly, the safety profile regarding renal function impairment or blood abnormalities was found to be similar between the Bicyclol and control groups in this large cohort.20
Additionally, one randomized controlled trial (RCT) suggested that Bicyclol could prevent the occurrence of DILI caused by anti-tuberculosis medications in patients with underlying liver disease, highlighting a potential prophylactic role in high-risk populations.11
Bicyclol's therapeutic applications extend beyond acute DILI to other chronic and metabolic liver diseases.
Bicyclol was approved for use in China as early as 2004 (with some sources suggesting 2001) for managing elevated aminotransferase levels in patients with chronic hepatitis.3 It has been described as a novel drug for treating chronic viral hepatitis B and C.8
However, systematic reviews conducted by the Cochrane Collaboration, with literature searches up to July 2005, presented a more cautious view regarding its efficacy in chronic viral hepatitis based on the available international evidence at that time:
There appears to be a notable disconnect between Bicyclol's regulatory approval and established use for chronic hepatitis in China and the conclusions drawn from these international systematic reviews published in 2005, which highlighted a lack of sufficient high-quality, long-term evidence from RCTs.[25] This discrepancy suggests several possibilities: more recent, robust clinical trials may have been conducted, particularly within China, that were not included in these earlier reviews; regulatory decisions in China may have been based on different evidence thresholds or types of studies (e.g., local trials, real-world evidence not typically captured by systematic reviews focusing on global RCTs); or the therapeutic landscape and standard of care might have evolved differently. This situation underscores the importance of considering the context and source of clinical evidence and highlights that national approvals do not always directly translate to global consensus without further substantiating data that meet diverse international evidentiary standards.
NAFLD and its progressive form, NASH, represent a growing global health concern with limited approved therapeutic options. Research indicates that Bicyclol may offer benefits in this area:
The preclinical findings for NAFLD/NASH [23] are particularly noteworthy as they point towards Bicyclol potentially addressing multiple facets of this complex metabolic disease, including steatosis (fat accumulation), inflammation, oxidative stress, and insulin resistance. NAFLD/NASH pathogenesis is multifactorial, and many investigational drugs have targeted only a single aspect of the disease, often with limited success. If Bicyclol's pleiotropic effects—acting on lipid metabolism, glucose homeostasis, inflammation, and oxidative stress—can be translated effectively to human clinical trials, it could emerge as a valuable multi-target therapeutic option. Such an agent, capable of impacting multiple pathogenic components, might offer a more holistic treatment approach than more narrowly focused drugs, potentially influencing various stages of NAFLD/NASH progression and improving overall outcomes.
Statin-induced liver injury is a relatively common clinical concern given the widespread use of statin medications. A multicenter RCT involving 168 patients demonstrated that Bicyclol (25 mg TID for 4 weeks) was significantly more effective than polyene phosphatidylcholine (PPC, 456 mg TID) in improving ALT levels and achieving higher ALT normalization rates (74.68% for Bicyclol vs. 46.15% for PPC) in patients with this condition. The safety profiles of the two treatments were comparable, with low incidences of adverse reactions (2.53% in the Bicyclol group vs. 2.56% in the PPC group).[3] This study provides strong evidence for Bicyclol as an effective and safe treatment option for managing statin-induced liver injury.
Liver fibrosis, the excessive accumulation of extracellular matrix proteins in the liver, is a common pathological pathway in most chronic liver diseases, potentially leading to cirrhosis and liver failure. Anti-fibrotic therapies represent a major unmet medical need. Preclinical studies suggest Bicyclol has significant anti-fibrotic potential:
The pharmacological properties of Bicyclol, particularly its anti-inflammatory and cytoprotective effects, have prompted investigation into its potential therapeutic applications beyond primary liver diseases. It has been identified as having potential therapeutic implications in a range of conditions, including idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, acute lung injury (ALI), cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury, renal dysfunction, renal cell carcinoma, and cardiovascular diseases.[1]
One specific area of non-hepatic investigation is Acute Lung Injury (ALI). A study demonstrated that Bicyclol mitigates lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced ALI in mice. The mechanism involves Bicyclol targeting MyD88, leading to the disruption of the MyD88/TLR4 complex and the inhibition of MyD88 polymer formation. These actions, in turn, mitigate downstream MAPKs and NF-κB signaling pathways, resulting in reduced pulmonary inflammation and decreased mortality in the animal model.[16]
The exploration of Bicyclol for these non-hepatic conditions, such as ALI, renal dysfunction, and cardiovascular diseases [1], suggests a strategic drug repurposing effort. This is likely driven by two key factors: Bicyclol's established safety profile from its extensive use in liver diseases in China, and its broad mechanisms of action that involve fundamental pathological processes like anti-inflammation and anti-oxidation. These processes are not unique to liver disease but are also central to the pathogenesis of many other systemic and organ-specific disorders. Drug repurposing, which involves finding new therapeutic uses for existing approved drugs, is a common and efficient strategy in pharmaceutical development as it can leverage existing safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic data, thereby potentially accelerating the development timeline and reducing costs. The specific mechanistic finding related to MyD88 inhibition in the context of ALI [16] provides a strong molecular rationale for this particular repurposing effort and underscores the potential for Bicyclol to find new utility in conditions characterized by excessive inflammation.
Bicyclol is generally considered to be a well-tolerated and safe medication, particularly for its approved indications in China. It is deemed suitable for long-term oral administration, even for periods exceeding six months.[3] Clinical trials have consistently reported minimal adverse effects associated with its use.[3] Comprehensive chronic toxicity studies have indicated "no noticeable toxic effects on all biochemical indices and pathological examinations of the main organs".[4]
Specific clinical trial data further support this favorable safety profile:
While generally well-tolerated, some adverse drug reactions have been associated with Bicyclol use. These are summarized in Table 4.
Table 4: Reported Adverse Drug Reactions of Bicyclol
ADR Category | Specific ADR | Description/Severity | Source Snippet(s) |
---|---|---|---|
Common | Gastrointestinal discomfort | Symptoms may include nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. Usually mild to moderate in severity and often transient, resolving as the body adjusts to the medication. | 28 |
Dizziness | Generally mild and transient. | 28 | |
Headaches | Generally mild and transient. | 28 | |
Less Common/Serious | Allergic reactions | May include rash, itching, swelling (e.g., of the face, tongue, or throat), severe dizziness, and difficulty breathing. These are rare but serious and require immediate medical attention. | 28 |
Liver enzyme abnormalities | Reported in some patients; regular monitoring of liver function is recommended. May necessitate dose adjustment or discontinuation if significant abnormalities are detected. | 28 | |
Hematological issues | Examples include leukopenia (decrease in white blood cells) or thrombocytopenia (decrease in platelets). These are rare; regular blood tests are often performed for monitoring. | 28 | |
Fatigue, generalized weakness | Usually mild but can affect daily activities. | 28 | |
Drug interactions | Bicyclol can interact with other medications (see also Section 3.2.6). | 28 |
The reporting of "liver enzyme abnormalities" as a potential adverse effect of Bicyclol [28] presents a paradox, given that its primary therapeutic use is as a hepatoprotective agent that lowers elevated liver enzymes. This apparent contradiction warrants careful consideration and further investigation to understand its context and clinical significance. Several possibilities could explain such an observation: it might be an idiosyncratic reaction occurring in a very small subset of susceptible patients; it could be a dose-dependent effect not typically seen at standard therapeutic doses; it might be a misattribution or an overly cautious inclusion in a general list of potential side effects; or the "abnormality" could refer to a different pattern of enzyme change than the elevations it is used to treat. The clinical trial data presented [6], which generally report good safety and no significant differences in liver-related adverse events compared to control groups, suggest that Bicyclol-induced liver enzyme elevation is likely a rare event or may stem from data sources outside these controlled trials, such as post-marketing surveillance or case reports. Nevertheless, this potential ADR needs to be clearly contextualized, as it could significantly impact the risk-benefit assessment if it were more than an exceptionally rare occurrence, especially in patients with pre-existing liver conditions.
Despite the list of potential ADRs, the general lack of severe adverse events reported across multiple clinical studies, systematic reviews, and its widespread clinical use in China [3] suggests a broadly favorable risk-benefit profile for its approved indications in that country. Bicyclol has been approved in China for approximately two decades [3] and is described as being "widely utilized in clinical practice" for hepatopathy.[1] This extensive clinical use provides a large population exposure, which is valuable for detecting both common and rare safety signals. The absence of major, frequent safety alarms in the provided information [28] from this extensive real-world experience is a positive indicator of its overall safety. While continued vigilance for rare ADRs is always necessary with any medication, the accumulated experience in China likely supports its ongoing use there. This substantial body of real-world safety data could also be valuable if Bicyclol were ever considered for regulatory approval in other regions, serving to supplement formal clinical trial data.
Specific contraindications for Bicyclol are not explicitly detailed in the provided source materials, beyond the general caution that applies to any drug regarding known hypersensitivity or allergic reactions to the active substance or any of its excipients. One study on liver injury following kidney transplantation excluded cases with "non-alcoholic and alcoholic liver diseases, autoimmune hepatitis" [30] from its analysis population; however, these were study-specific exclusion criteria and do not necessarily represent general contraindications for Bicyclol itself.
Precautions for the use of Bicyclol include:
Bicyclol has a well-established regulatory status in China, where it was developed and is primarily used.
In contrast to its status in China, Bicyclol has not achieved widespread regulatory approval in major Western regions:
The discrepancy in regulatory approval status—established use in China versus lack of approval in Western regions like the United States and Europe—likely reflects fundamental differences in regulatory requirements, the nature and extent of data packages submitted for review, and potentially varying perceptions of unmet medical need or the existing therapeutic landscape in these distinct geographical and healthcare environments. The long-standing approval and use of Bicyclol in China suggest the accumulation of a significant body of local clinical experience and data that has satisfied the NMPA. However, the evidence package that meets the criteria of one national regulatory authority may not necessarily be sufficient for, or even submitted to, other major regulatory bodies, which often have their own specific and rigorous standards for clinical trial design, endpoints, comparator arms, manufacturing quality (GMP), and overall risk-benefit assessment. This situation highlights the complexities inherent in global drug registration and the challenges of translating national pharmaceutical innovations to a global stage.
The status of Bicyclol as an "innovative chemical drug with proprietary intellectual property rights in China" [4], coupled with its long-term clinical use and demonstrated efficacy for certain conditions (e.g., DILI in the NCT02944552 trial [6]), could position it as a candidate for international partnerships or out-licensing agreements. A Chinese company holding the primary IP might seek collaborations with pharmaceutical entities in Western markets that have the resources and expertise to conduct the additional clinical trials necessary to meet FDA or EMA standards. Such trials would likely need to be designed with global regulatory expectations in mind, potentially involving diverse patient populations and comparisons against internationally recognized standards of care. This pathway could represent a model for other innovative drugs developed in China, particularly those derived from its rich traditional medicine heritage, to enter global markets. Success in such endeavors would foster international collaboration in pharmaceutical development and potentially enrich the global pharmacopoeia with novel therapeutic options.
Bicyclol is a synthetic, small molecule drug derived from Schisandrin C, an active component of the traditional Chinese medicine Schisandra chinensis. It functions primarily as a hepatoprotective agent, exerting its effects through a multifaceted mechanism of action that includes potent antioxidant activity, significant anti-inflammatory effects, induction of cellular autophagy, stimulation of heat shock protein expression, and antiviral properties, particularly against Hepatitis B Virus. Bicyclol has achieved regulatory approval and established clinical use in China for indications such as drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and the management of elevated transaminases in chronic hepatitis. Its efficacy in DILI is notably supported by the positive results of the multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled Phase 2 clinical trial NCT02944552. The safety profile of Bicyclol is generally reported as favorable, characterized by good tolerability even with long-term administration, although common mild adverse drug reactions (ADRs) like gastrointestinal discomfort and dizziness, as well as rare but more serious ADRs, have been noted.
Within China, Bicyclol represents a key therapeutic option for the treatment of acute DILI and for managing elevated liver enzymes in various chronic liver diseases. There is also a growing body of evidence, primarily from preclinical studies and some clinical research including meta-analyses, suggesting its utility in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)/non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and in statin-induced liver injury. However, according to older international systematic reviews (from 2005), the evidence base supporting its use for chronic viral hepatitis (B and C) was considered limited in terms of large, long-term, high-quality randomized controlled trials meeting global standards at that time.
The future development and broader application of Bicyclol, particularly on an international scale, will likely depend on several key research endeavors:
The future trajectory of Bicyclol, especially concerning its potential use outside of China, will be heavily contingent upon a willingness to invest in such rigorous, large-scale clinical trials. These trials must be meticulously designed to meet the stringent evidence standards set by international regulatory bodies like the U.S. FDA and the EMA. While Bicyclol's origins in TCM provide a unique discovery pathway and a long history of empirical use, this heritage may also necessitate overcoming a degree of skepticism within some Western medical and scientific circles. This can only be achieved through the generation and transparent dissemination of robust, high-quality scientific data from well-conducted clinical investigations.
Ultimately, Bicyclol's journey from a traditional medicine derivative to a modern pharmaceutical could serve as an insightful case study for the globalization of medicines derived from traditional pharmacopoeias. Its development and regulatory pathway highlight the challenges involved in translating local clinical success and national regulatory approval into broader international acceptance. This underscores a critical need for greater harmonization of research standards, increased international collaboration in clinical research, and transparent sharing of comprehensive data packages. Successfully navigating these challenges could not only expand the therapeutic reach of promising drugs like Bicyclol but also pave the way for a richer, more diverse global pharmacopoeia, integrating valuable knowledge from various medical traditions with the rigor of modern science.
Published at: May 19, 2025
This report is continuously updated as new research emerges.