跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02590211
NCT02590211已完成不适用

Poker, Skills and Associated Problems (PERHAPS). Controlled Experimental Single Centre Study of Poker Players: Study of the Cognitive Mechanisms Underlying Poker Skills and of the Specificity of Poker-related Problems

Nantes University Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 113 人开始时间: 2016年9月27日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
113
试验地点
1
主要终点
inhibition performances

研究概览

简要总结

The PERHAPS project aims to fill two gaps in the scientific literature: on the one hand, studying the clinical and cognitive particularities of poker-related problems, and on the other hand, studying poker skill as a combination of multiple cognitive and emotional abilities. The underlying clinical aim is to develop a cognitive remediation therapy program dedicated to pathological gamblers.

详细描述

In the literature, although compulsive poker players undoubtedly share similarities with the compulsive gamblers of other gambling games, clinicians have observed significant specificities in these patients, in terms of personality profile, gaming practices and associated troubles. These specificities could influence the effectiveness of treatment and prevention strategies in many ways. However, there are very few studies focused on the specific poker-related problems, particularly compared to other practices.

Furthermore, skill at poker has often been treated as a unique and general ability. This binary vision is now considered widely insufficient and most researchers recommend exploring the individual cognitive abilities at play in poker skill. To the investigators knowledge, no study has done this to date.

Consequently, the PERHAPS project aims to fill two gaps in the scientific literature: on the one hand, studying the clinical and cognitive particularities of poker-related problems, and on the other hand, studying poker skill as a combination of multiple cognitive and emotional abilities.

Three profiles of poker players will be studied, depending on their gambling practices and whether or not they are addicted: a control group of 30 non-poker players, a group of 30 expert unproblematic poker players, and a group of 30 pathological poker players.

The three groups will be compared with one another on:

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 59 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
是

入选标准

  • •18-59 years
  • •good understanding of French, literate
  • •correct level of vision and hearing
  • •specific inclusion criteria for each group include frequency and length of poker practice, DSM-5 doagnostic criteria for gambling disorder

排除标准

  • •protected adults
  • •important cognitive deficit (assessed by the MMSE)
  • •psychotic syndrome whole life
  • •other psychiatric disorders (mood disorders, anxiety disorders) and addictive disorders (disorders related to the use of alcoholic or other substances, excluding nicotine) that are present and not stabilized
  • •unstable endocrine disorders
  • •significant neurological disorders (such as head injuries (except mild), neurodegenerative diseases, unbalanced epilepsy, mental retardation, etc.)
  • •psychoactive use (before participation)
  • •color blindness
  • •cardiac disorders
  • •electronic implants

研究组 & 干预措施

non-poker players

Other

(control group)

干预措施: cognitive, emotional and clinical assessment (Behavioral)

expert unproblematic poker players

Other

(comparator)

干预措施: cognitive, emotional and clinical assessment (Behavioral)

pathological poker players

Other

(comparator)

干预措施: cognitive, emotional and clinical assessment (Behavioral)

结局指标

主要结局

inhibition performances

时间窗: only one assessment so at baseline

Evaluation of inhibition at verbal level: Hayling sentence Completion Task Performances will be compared between pathological poker players and non-poker players (to identify cognitive deficits in pathological players compared to baseline level)

attention and emotional perception performances

时间窗: only one assessment so at baseline

Modified Posner paradigm Performances will be compared between pathological poker players and non-poker players (to identify cognitive deficits in pathological players compared to baseline level) and between pathological poker players and expert unproblematic poker players (to identify cognitive deficits in pathological players compared to a gambler level)

mental flexibility performances

时间窗: only one assessment so at baseline

Wisconsin Test (M-WCST) Performances will be compared between pathological poker players and non-poker players (to identify cognitive deficits in pathological players compared to baseline level) and between pathological poker players and expert unproblematic poker players (to identify cognitive deficits in pathological players compared to a gambler level)

次要结局

  • level of cognitive distortions,(only one assessment so at baseline)
  • control attribution (locus of control)(only one assessment so at baseline)
  • gambling course and habits(only one assessment so at baseline)
  • level of social phobia(only one assessment so at baseline)
  • motivation for gambling(only one assessment so at baseline)
  • impulsivity profile(only one assessment so at baseline)
  • psychiatric and addictive comorbidities(only one assessment so at baseline)
  • coping and gambling related-damage(only one assessment so at baseline)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验