跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04616118
NCT04616118已完成不适用

Comparing Modes of Telehealth Delivery:Phone vs. Video Visits

University of Alabama at Birmingham2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 269 人开始时间: 2020年5月27日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
269
试验地点
2
主要终点
Patient Satisfaction

研究概览

简要总结

Given the current public health crisis the use of telehealth consultation visits including phone-only and video visits has exponentially increased. This study will investigate if the conduct of telehealth phone only visits is non-inferior in terms of patient satisfaction/experience, adherence to post-visit recommendations such as medications, blood work and other medical testing, follow up care, when compared to the conduct of video delivered telehealth visits. Patients will be randomized to receive a routine care visit via phone only vs. video.

详细描述

Telemedicine and an emerging field of novel care delivery modalities, which encompasses all forms of remote-based care. These include asynchronous (store-and-forward) and consultative care by specialists, mobile-device based care, and real-time video chat, and synchronous telemedicine. Health care services delivered remotely through telecommunications and video technology is steadily increasing as technology evolves and access becomes more widely available. The increasing availability of personal technology - 89% Americans have internet access, 77% are online daily - offers patients and clinicians the opportunity to utilize real-time virtual communication to enhance access for patients when transportation challenges, schedules, or physical disability make office visits difficult in any geography. With the increased use of technology in healthcare, much emphasis has been placed on telemedicine as it can extend the services of providers to remote locations and overcome the barrier of proximity. This expands access to care and has the potential of making healthcare services more convenient for many patients who otherwise might suffer access barriers.

It is increasingly evident that telehealth can improve access to healthcare services and specialists; prevent unnecessary delays in receiving care, and facilitate coordinated care and interprofessional collaboration. The World Health Organization affirms the efficacy of telehealth as an effective service delivery model for professionals.

Telemedicine has been shown to improve health outcomes, increase communication with providers, increase access to high-quality service, decrease travel time, decrease missed appointments, decrease wait time, decrease repeat admissions, increase self-awareness, increase medication adherence, and increase self-monitoring of chronic conditions. The technical quality of telehealth consultation (e.g. audio and visual quality of a videoconference) has been shown to influence clinicians' willingness to practice in this manner and the satisfaction of users. A recent systematic review on patient satisfaction with telemedicine found that patient satisfaction can be associated with the modality of telehealth, but factors of effectiveness and efficiency are mixed. Telehealth is a feasible option to expand practices to remote areas without having to relocate or expand. Understanding the perceived relative value of different modes of healthcare services may help to shape the use of virtual or remote healthcare technologies. System learning that demonstrates the value of different types of "visits" for the system and the patient is essential.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Health Services Research
盲法
Double (Participant, Investigator)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Access to a phone and video call capacity
  • A minimum of 1 visits in the last year with their provider
  • Medicare/Medicaid eligible

排除标准

  • Individuals not meeting inclusion criteria

结局指标

主要结局

Patient Satisfaction

时间窗: 36 hours post visit

Patient satisfaction with type of visit. Satisfaction will be measured using the 11-point ARHQ-CAHPS patient satisfaction instrument.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Maria Danila, MD, MSc, MSPH

Associate Professor of Medicine

University of Alabama at Birmingham

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验