CRET Therapy in Low Back Pain Treatment.
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 52
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- VAS
研究概览
简要总结
This retrospective observational study compares the effectiveness of two CRET therapies in adults with physical dysfunction. It evaluates whether the UNIQ electrode Fisiowarm 7.0 improves lumbar ROM (Schober test) and reduces pain (VAS scores) more effectively than the classical methodology, with assessments at baseline (T0) and two weeks (T1).
详细描述
The goal of this retrospective observational study is to compare the effectiveness of two CRET therapy methodologies in adults (mean age ±SD: 51.23±16.89 for treated, 51.20±14.34 for control; M/F ratio: 42%M, 58%F for treated, 40%M, 60%F for control) experiencing physical dysfunction.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does treatment with the UNIQ electrode Fisiowarm 7.0 improve range of motion (ROM) as measured by the Schober test more effectively than the classical methodology?
- Does treatment with the UNIQ electrode Fisiowarm 7.0 reduce pain levels, as reported through VAS scores, more effectively than the classical methodology?
Participants underwent therapy with either Fisiowarm 7.0 or Activ CT8 INDIBA® as per their group assignment.
Have their ROM measured using the Schober test at baseline (T0) and after two weeks (T1).
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Cohort
- 时间视角
- Other
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- 未提供
排除标准
- 未提供
结局指标
主要结局
VAS
时间窗: 2 WEEKS
The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) measures pain intensity on a scale of 1 to 10, where 1 represents "no pain" and 10 represents "worst imaginable pain."
次要结局
- ROM(2 WEEKS)