跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05838222
NCT05838222已完成不适用

Implementation and Efficacy of Solution Focused Interventions Within an Integrated Behavioral Health Setting

University of Georgia1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 80 人开始时间: 2023年5月8日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
80
试验地点
1
主要终点
Depression outcomes

研究概览

简要总结

Integrated behavioral healthcare (IBH) emerged to address the high prevalence of psychosocial issues endemic to primary care settings coupled with primary care provider's discomfort in addressing psychosocial issues. IBH addresses the lack of psychosocial care in primary care settings by expanding the traditional healthcare team through the inclusion of a behavioral health provider (clinical social worker, licensed psychologist, etc.). The behavioral health provider utilizes evidenced based interventions to support the healthcare team with addressing a wide range of healthcare concerns. Solution Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT) provides a promising treatment approach within IBH settings due to the high productivity standards within primary care and the efficient, solution based style foundational to SFBT. In addition, SFBT is strengths based and emphasizes patient centered approaches which primary care aspires to achieve. Despite the natural fit, there is a paucity of research regarding SFBT within integrated care settings in general, and for specific disease states. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of SFBT within an IBH setting in the treatment of depression while assessing for commensurate improvement with traditional healthcare markers such as A1C, blood pressure, pulse, and weight. In addition, scaling questions will be utilized to assess for increase in core SFBT constructs to include self-awareness of strengths, future hope, and increased ability to problem solve. A pre-posttest experimental design will assess the differences between those receiving SFBT and treatment as usual across symptoms of depression, SFBT core attributes, and health outcomes.

详细描述

Integrated behavioral healthcare (IBH) emerged to address the high prevalence of psychosocial issues endemic to primary care settings coupled with primary care provider's discomfort in addressing psychosocial issue. IBH addresses the lack of psychosocial care in primary care settings by expanding the traditional healthcare team through the inclusion of a behavioral health provider (clinical social worker, licensed psychologist, etc.). The behavioral health provider utilizes evidenced based interventions to support the healthcare team with addressing a wide range of healthcare concerns. Solution Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT) provides a promising treatment approach within IBH settings due to the high productivity standards within primary care and the efficient, solution based style foundational to SFBT. In addition, SFBT is strengths based and emphasizes patient centered approaches which primary care aspires to achieve. Despite the natural fit, there is a paucity of research regarding SFBT within integrated care settings in general, and for specific disease states. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of SFBT within an IBH setting in the treatment of depression while assessing for commensurate improvement with traditional healthcare markers such as A1C, blood pressure, pulse, and weight. In addition, scaling questions will be utilized to assess for increase in core SFBT constructs to include self-awareness of strengths, future hope, and increased ability to problem solve. A pre-posttest experimental design will assess the differences between those receiving SFBT and treatment as usual across symptoms of depression, SFBT core attributes, and health outcomes.

Study Aims

The purpose of this study is to examine the efficacy of SFBT in an integrated care setting for addressing depressive symptoms and health outcomes among patients with depression. The study aims are to:

Aim 1: Assess SFBT's impact on core SFBT constructs (hope, connection with important people, strengths). Measure SFBT constructs in both the control and treatment group and assess differences between the two groups

Aim 2: Assess efficacy of SFBT for depression. Examine differences between the treatment and control group for depression scores utilizing the PHQ-9.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Over 18 years old

排除标准

  • •No significant co occurring mental health disorders

研究组 & 干预措施

Intervention Group

Experimental

The intervention group will receive 3 sessions of SFBT from a licensed therapist in addition to treatment as usual

干预措施: Solution Focused Intervention (Behavioral)

Control

Active Comparator

This group will be the treatment as usual group who will receive primary care treatment without the SFBT intervention

干预措施: Treatment as Usual (Other)

Intervention Group

Experimental

The intervention group will receive 3 sessions of SFBT from a licensed therapist in addition to treatment as usual

干预措施: Treatment as Usual (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Depression outcomes

时间窗: 4 months

Assess efficacy of SFBT for depression. The investigator will examine differences between the treatment and control group for depression scores utilizing the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9.)

Solution Focused Scaling Questions

时间窗: 4 months

The authors utilized a solution-focused treatment manual to extract the essential ingredients of solution-focused treatment and create a scale measuring the degree to which participants 1) have experienced hope, 2) experienced connection to important people, 3) identified their strengths, 4) have hope for a "good" future, and 5) believe they could solve problems in their lives over the past two weeks. Each of these questions occurred on a 1-10 scale where 1 was "not at all" and 10 was "completely." This screening tool was provided to participants in paper format where participants self-administered the survey.

Acceptability measure

时间窗: 4 months

Evaluate acceptability for SFBT. The Acceptability of Intervention measure (AIM) will be used to assess the acceptability of the intervention for the treatment group. The AIM measures acceptability by asking participants whether the intervention 1) met their approval, 2) is appealing to them, 3) whether they like the intervention, and 4) whether they would welcome the intervention. A 5-point Likert scale is utilized to assess each of these domains. The scale will be self-administered by participants.

Diabetes Outcomes

时间窗: 4 months

Assess efficacy of SFBT for diabetes. The investigator will examine differences between the treatment and control group for depression scores utilizing HbA1c.

Feasibility measure

时间窗: 4 months

Evaluate feasibility for SFBT. The Feasibility of Intervention measure (FIM) will be used to assess the feasibility of the intervention for the treatment group. The FIM assesses whether the participant believes that the intervention seems 1) implementable, 2) possible, 3) doable, and 4) easy to use. A 5-point Likert scale is utilized to assess each of these domains. The scale will be self-administered by participants.

次要结局

  • Hypertension(4 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Orion Mowbray

Associate Dean of Research

University of Georgia

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验