跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01129921
NCT01129921已完成不适用

Comparative Study of Sham Versus Mild® (Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression) Procedure in Patients Diagnosed With Symptomatic Moderate to Severe Lumbar Central Canal Stenosis

Napa Pain Institute1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 40 人开始时间: 2010年4月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
40
试验地点
1
主要终点
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) <=4

研究概览

简要总结

This is a single-center, randomized, prospective, double-blind, clinical study to assess the clinical application and outcomes with mild® devices versus sham in patients with symptomatic moderate to severe central canal spinal stenosis. Sham patients were eligible to choose to cross-over and have the actual decompression procedure after week 6 exam.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Symptomatic and lumbar spine stenosis (LSS) primarily caused by dorsal element hypertrophy.
  • •Prior failure of conservative therapy and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Score of >20%.
  • •Radiologic evidence of LSS, ligamentum flavum hypertrophy (typically > 2.5mm)confirmed by pre op MRI and/or CT.
  • •Central canal cross sectional area clearly reduced per MRI/CT report.
  • •If present, anterior listhesis ≤ 5.0mm (preferred) and stable.
  • •Able to walk at least 10 feet unaided before being limited by pain.
  • •Available to complete 26 weeks of follow-up.
  • •A signed Informed consent Form is obtained from the subject.
  • •Adults at least 18 years of age.

排除标准

  • •Prior surgery at intended treatment level.
  • •History of recent spinal fractures with concurrent pain symptoms as determined by the Investigator.
  • •Disabling back or leg pain from causes other than LSS (e.g. acute compression fracture, metabolic neuropathy, or vascular claudication symptoms, etc.).
  • •Disk protrusion or osteophyte formation severe enough to confound study outcome.
  • •Facet hypertrophy severe enough to confound study outcome.
  • •Bleeding disorders and/or current use of anti-coagulants.
  • •Use of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) within five days of treatment.
  • •Epidural steroid administration within prior 3 weeks(of procedure or sham)
  • •Inability of the subject to lie prone for any reason with anesthesia support (e.g. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), obesity, etc.).
  • •Metabolic wound healing pathologies deemed by Investigator to compromise study outcome.
  • •Dementia and/or inability to give informed consent.
  • •Pregnancy and/or breastfeeding.
  • •On Workman's Compensation or considering litigation associated with back pain.

研究组 & 干预措施

Decompression with mild® Device Kit

Active Comparator

Fluoroscopically guided percutaneous lumbar decompression using the Vertos mild® Device Kit for bone and tissue removal to decompress the targeted stenosed level(s).

干预措施: Percutaneous Lumbar Decompression (Device)

Sham lumbar decompression

Sham Comparator

Sham procedure of fluoroscopically guided percutaneous placement of mild® Device Kit instrumentation with no removal of bone or tissue.

干预措施: Sham lumbar decompression (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) <=4

时间窗: Week 6 to 12 & Year One After Sham to mild x-over

VAS as measured on a 10-point scale. A score of 4 or less after treatment is considered favorable, as it indicates pain is less than the "moderate to severe" categories represented by scores of 5 to 10. All patients in each arm who reported a pain score of 4 or less at Week 6-12 and Year 1 are reported below.

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Mean Improvement

时间窗: Baseline and Year 1

VAS ten point scale where 0 = no pain and 10 represents worst pain imaginable. Mean improvement of two or more points is considered clinically relevant. The mean improvement from Baseline to Year-1 is presented below for the two treatment groups.

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) <=4

时间窗: Week 6 to 12 prior to cross-over

Using VAS, pain is measured on a 0 to 10 point scale where 0 represents no pain and 10 indicates severe pain. A post-treatment score of 4 points is the accepted threshold between a "mild" pain score of 1-3 points and a "moderate to severe" pain score of 5 to 10 points which represents debilitating pain that would qualify the patient for a different or additional treatment option. All patients in each arm who reported a pain score of 4 or less at six to twelve weeks post-treatment are reported below.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Eric J. Grigsby, MD

Founder / Medical Director

Napa Pain Institute

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验