跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06318819
NCT06318819已完成不适用

Plaque Removal Effectiveness of a Flossing Device (Dental Floss Holders) Compared to the Conventional Flossing in Adults: a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Maha A. Bahammam1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 30 人开始时间: 2019年11月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
30
试验地点
1
主要终点
Conventional flossing (CF)

研究概览

简要总结

  • Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness in plaque removal of the new device; Dental floss holders and compare the results to the conventional way of flossing.
  • Methods: Thirty adult male and female participants participated in this randomized, single-use, single-blind clinical study. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups; Group A: Consists of 30 participants in whom Dental Floss Holders (DFH) was constructed to either maxillary or mandibular arch randomly. Group B: Consists of 30 participants in whom conventional flossing (CF) was done to the other arch.

Participants attended the first visit for primary impression taking in order to construct the DFH. In the second visit, participants were examined by a blinded examiner to record their plaque index using O'Leary index. Then, they flossed using DFH and CF according to the group they were assigned to. Participants were monitored to ensure proper coverage of all the areas following precise instructions. They then brushed their teeth for approximately 2 minutes using modified bass technique. Next, plaque index was recorded again using the O'leary index. Time was recorded during flossing of each arch. Finally, participants were given a questionnaire to assess their satisfaction of the device.

  • Results: The differences between the groups showed the DFH group with a 62.8% reduction in whole mouth plaque and 63.3% for proximal plaque compared to 52.9% and 50.4% for the CF group, respectively (p = 0.01). The DFH was more time efficient in removing plaque from the marginal regions with an average time of 00:00:37 in comparison to the CF which averaged in 00:02:07 (p < 0.001). A total of 26 participants (86.7%) preferred using the DFH over the CF.
  • Conclusion: With the combination of toothbrushing, the Dental Floss Holders is significantly more effective and time efficient than conventional flossing in removing plaque from tooth surfaces.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
20 Years 至 26 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
是

入选标准

  • •Able to understand, read, and write in Arabic or English and provide written informed consent prior to participation.
  • •Not engaged in any other clinical study during the day of examination.
  • •Non-smoker and in good general health.
  • •Does not have any systemic disease that influences the oral tissue (e.g., diabetes, autoimmune disease, medication/antibiotics).
  • •Fully dentate (not including 3rd molars) with established proximal contacts.
  • •Good oral health with no hard or soft tissue lesions, no gross caries, no probing depths greater than 4 mm, no obvious advanced periodontal disease, no fixed orthodontic appliances, nor removable partial dentures.
  • •Does not have any dexterity limitation.
  • •Not pregnant at the time of the study.

排除标准

  • 未提供

研究组 & 干预措施

Dental Floss Holders

Experimental

Dental Floss Holders was constructed.

干预措施: Dental Floss Holders (Device)

conventional flossing

Active Comparator

conventional flossing to the opposite arch.

干预措施: Dental Floss Holders (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

Conventional flossing (CF)

时间窗: 6 months

52.9% reduction in whole mouth plaque and 50.4% for proximal plaque

Dental Floss Holders (DFH)

时间窗: 6 months

62.8% reduction in whole mouth plaque 63.3% for proximal plaque

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Maha A. Bahammam
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor Investigator
主要研究者

Maha A. Bahammam

Professor

King Abdulaziz University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验