跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00145301
NCT00145301已完成3 期

A 52-week, International, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Parallel-group Clinical Trial to Compare Retention on Treatment, Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Lumiracoxib 100 mg od, Lumiracoxib 100 mg Bid and Celecoxib 200 mg od in Patients With Primary Osteoarthritis of Hip, Knee, Hand or Spine

Novartis2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 3,036 人开始时间: 2004年9月1日最近更新:
适应症
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
3 期
状态
已完成
发起方
Novartis
入组人数
3,036
试验地点
2
主要终点
To show that either regimen of lumiracoxib (100mg od or 100mg bid) is not inferior to celecoxib 200mg od with respect to retention rate at 1 year in pts suffering from primary OA in hip, knee, hand or spine.

研究概览

简要总结

This trial will compare the retention on treatment (based on the rate of patients staying on treatment for 1 year) of patients suffering from primary osteoarthritis using two different doses of lumiracoxib (100 mg od or 100 mg bid) or using celecoxib (200 mg od)

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double

入排标准

年龄范围
40 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Primary osteoarthritis in the hip, knee, hand, or spine
  • Requiring NSAID therapy

排除标准

  • Secondary OA with history and/ or any evidence of the following diseases: rheumatoid arthritis, uncontrolled gout, inflammatory joint disease, ochronosis, acromegaly, hemochromatosis, Wilson's disease, primary osteochondromatosis, heritable disorders (e.g. hypermobility), collagen gene mutations, primary fibromyalgia (secondary fibromyalgia is allowed if in the opinion of the investigator it will not interfere with the patient's OA pain assessment), and systemic lupus erythematosus
  • History and/ or any evidence of the following diseases in the target joint: septic arthritis, gout, recurrent episodes of pseudogout, Paget's disease of the bone, and articular fracture. If the patient has history of these conditions, then patient should only be excluded if the target joint is affected.
  • History of severe adverse reactions of any kind under lumiracoxib or celecoxib treatment.
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.

结局指标

主要结局

To show that either regimen of lumiracoxib (100mg od or 100mg bid) is not inferior to celecoxib 200mg od with respect to retention rate at 1 year in pts suffering from primary OA in hip, knee, hand or spine.

次要结局

  • Safety & tolerability of pts using lumiracoxib vs pts using celecoxib
  • Efficacy of lumiracoxib vs celecoxib with respect to Patient's assessment of OA pain, Patient's global assessment of disease activity, and Physician's global assessment of disease activity
  • To compare reasons for discontinuation from treatment with lumiracoxib vs treatment with celecoxib
  • To validate the psychometric properties of the Short Arthritis assessment Scale (SAS) by analyzing pt reported outcomes collected in this study

研究者

发起方
Novartis
申办方类型
Industry
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验