跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07126314
NCT07126314Enrolling By Invitation不适用

Critical Appraisals at Play: Elevating EM Journal Clubs With Team-Based Competition

Community Medical Center, Toms River, NJ2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 36 人开始时间: 2025年8月13日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
Enrolling By Invitation
发起方
入组人数
36
试验地点
2
主要终点
Change in score in knowledge based quiz

研究概览

简要总结

Pre and Post assessment of knowledge and attitudes on critical appraisal of biomedical literature in Emergency Medicine practice in a cohort of residents with implementation of a competition based educational format.

详细描述

During the academic year of 2025-2026, the 36 Emergency Medicine residents of a community medicine affiliate of a tertiary medical center will be compete against each other during the journal club didactic. Three residents will be assigned each month, one from each year, to select a journal article matching the curricular content block of that month. Residents will submit their selected article after faculty approval.

Residents will submit their critiques of the journal articles prior to the scheduled journal club via a dedicated residency website. They will focus on potential methodological flaws of the article. This is congruent to how journal club didactics were focused in the past in the institution, so second and third years will have had exposure to this approach.

During journal club, besides having the resident that selected the article briefly present it, resident critiques will be discussed. A single point will be awarded to each resident for each critique they have submitted. For critiques of significant merit, as determined by the faculty, the journal club facilitator will invite the submitting resident to discuss their critique, and will be awarded 2 points. To discourage artificial intelligence (AI) use without learning, critiques will be selected at faculty discretion to be orally explained during journal club to the satisfaction of the faculty. The faculty have determined that if residents utilize AI as a tool to enhance their learning (instead of simply enumerating critiques blindly on a document), this is in service towards the goal of journal club, and should be encouraged.

As a reward, residents that have the highest running score will receive $100 Amazon gift cards, tiered by 1st, 2nd, and 3rd year academic status.

Attitudes towards the importance of critical assessment of scientific literature, self assessments of fluency in scientific literature appraisal, and the effectiveness of journal club, will be conducted via anonymous survey on RedCap at the beginning and end of the academic year. The survey utilized will be the modified version of a previously validated survey used by Haspel2. Additionally, residents will be assigned Journal Club based quizzes from Rosh Review13, a platform tailored for resident education, at the beginning and end of the year. Rosh Review provides comparative benchmarks that can be used to assess resident performance.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • All emergency medicine residents at study site

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Change in score in knowledge based quiz

时间窗: 11 months

A journal club based quiz, created by Rosh Review, will be administered pre and post. Changes in scores will be noted.

次要结局

  • Difference in knowledge quiz compared to benchmark score(11 months)
  • Subjective assessment of value of curriculum(11 months)
  • Changes in attitudes regarding comfort in interpreting biomedical literature(11 months)

研究者

发起方
Community Medical Center, Toms River, NJ
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Greg Neyman

Principal Investigator

Community Medical Center, Toms River, NJ

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验