跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01925898
NCT01925898Unknown4 期

A Randomized, Clinical Trial of Oral Midazolam Versus Oral Ketamine for Sedation During Laceration Repair.

Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2013年8月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
4 期
入组人数
60
试验地点
1
主要终点
Pain score: Visual analog score (VAS)- by a parent

研究概览

简要总结

Sedation is often needed for young children undergoing minor procedures in the emergency department (ED). Oral midazolam is one of the most commonly used regimens for children undergoing laceration repair but its sedative efficacy was shown to be suboptimal. In only one randomized controlled study oral ketamine has been used successfully for procedural sedation for laceration repair. A recent study showed that the combination of oral midazolam and oral ketamine provided deeper sedation compared with oral midazolam alone. However children treated wuth the combination of midazolam and ketamine required longer recovery

Hypothesis:

Oral ketamine can provide superior sedation to oral midazolam in children requiring sedation for laceration repair.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
1 Year 至 10 Years(Child)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Any child with laceration requiring sedation

排除标准

  • Major trauma
  • Closed head injury associated with loss of consciousness
  • Abnormal neurologic examination in a previously normal child
  • Significant developmental delay or baseline neurological deficit
  • A patient with seizures
  • Elevated intra-cranial pressure
  • Hypersensitivity to midazolam or ketamine
  • Hypertension
  • Hyperthyroidism or a patient receiving thyroid replacement
  • alcohol intoxication or a history of alcohol abuse
  • Acute or chronic respiratory, cardiac, renal or hepatic abnormalities
  • Known psychiatric disease
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of more than 2
  • Informed consent cannot be obtained from legal guardian

研究组 & 干预措施

Midazolam

Active Comparator

Oral Midazolam

干预措施: Midazolam - active comparator (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Pain score: Visual analog score (VAS)- by a parent

时间窗: During the procedure - up to 1 hour

A parent will assess the child's pain on a Visual analog scale

Number of patients requiring IV sedation

时间窗: During the procedure - up to 1 hour

patients who fail to achieve University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS) of two or higher will be switched to IV sedation

次要结局

  • • Patients and parents satisfaction assessed on VAS(While in the ED - estimated time around 2 hours)
  • UMSS - by ED physician(During the procedure - up to 1 hour)
  • • VAS by nurse(During the procedure - up to 1 hour)
  • Time to reach UMSS > 2(up to 1 hour)
  • • Procedure time(During the procedure - up to 1 hour)
  • • Time from procedure to full recovery(While in the ED - estimated time around 2 hours)
  • The occurrence of adverse effects during the ED stay(While in the ED - estimated time around 2 hours)

研究者

申办方类型
Other Gov
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验