跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2022/02/039915
CTRI/2022/02/039915尚未招募未知

A comparative evaluation of prosthetic and biological outcome as influenced by two different implant restorative materials (porcelain fused to metal and monolithic zirconia) - A prospective, cross arch study

Taniya Malhotra0 个研究点目标入组 0 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
未知
状态
尚未招募
发起方

研究概览

简要总结

暂无简介。

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional

入排标准

入选标准

  • 1.Two implants placed in the same arch in posterior quadrant requiring prosthodontic rehabilitation.
  • 2.Interocclusal restorative space of 8-10 mm
  • 3.Healthy Periodontium with no visible signs of bruxism
  • 4.Stable and healthy implants with no crestal bone loss

排除标准

  • 1. According to ASA Classification Class 4 patients:
  • Organic heart disease with marked signs of cardiac insufficiency
  • Recent myocardial infarction of less than 6 months duration.
  • Unstable angina.
  • Patients with advanced degrees of pulmonary, renal or endocrine insufficiency
  • 2. According to ASA Classification Class 3 patients
  • Diabetes with complications to vascular or other organs, i.e., retinopathy, neuropathy, etc.
  • 3. Occlusal anomalies
  • 4. Long term edentulism leading to mesial drifting of adjacent teeth or supraaeruption of opposing teeth
  • 5.Para-functional Habits (Bruxism)
  • 7.Active periodontal disease
  • 8.Allergy to materials used in the study
  • 9.Current drug abuse
  • 10.Pregnant or intend to become pregnant.
  • 11.Severe salivary gland dysfunction.

研究者

发起方
Taniya Malhotra

相似试验