跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05285202
NCT05285202已完成不适用

Clinic Versus Hotspot Active Case Finding and Linkage to Preventive Therapy (ACF/TPT) Strategy Evaluation for TB: A Cluster-Randomized Crossover Trial

Johns Hopkins University2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 146,539 人开始时间: 2022年6月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
146,539
试验地点
2
主要终点
Pulmonary bacteriologically confirmed TB notifications, hotspot vs facility

研究概览

简要总结

This five-year study will evaluate two strategies for conducting tuberculosis (TB) active case finding (ACF) and linkage to TB treatment or TB preventive therapy (TPT) in peri-urban Uganda. The two strategies differ in the location where ACF activities are performed: A "facility-based" ACF/TPT strategy will perform ACF, plus linkage to TPT, in the immediate vicinity of a large public health facility and will primarily recruit individuals who are attending the health facility, irrespective of TB suspicion or symptoms. Alternatively, a "hotspot-based" strategy will use routine notification data and local expertise to identify local TB hotspots - defined as the geographic areas though to have the highest burden of undiagnosed TB per estimated population. The same infrastructure (personnel, equipment, supplies, etc.) for ACF/TPT will then be placed in those zones for a period of four months at a time, and the general population will be recruited for screening and linkage to TPT.

The two interventions will be compared in a Type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial with a cluster-randomized, multiple-period crossover design. The study will evaluate whether hotspot-focused ACF/TPT results in a greater number of TB patients diagnosed and linked to care, and a greater number of individuals started on preventive therapy, than facility-based ACF/TPT. Secondarily, it will also compare the two interventions in terms of number of people initiated on TPT, and it will compare TB cases detected in regions performing ACF/TPT (either approach) against cases detected in regions that continue to perform the standard of care.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Screening
盲法
Single (Investigator)

入排标准

年龄范围
5 Years 至 —(Child, Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age ≥15 years, OR age 5-14 and a close contact of someone diagnosed with TB,
  • Provision of oral informed consent, or, if age <18 years and not legally emancipated, oral informed assent (if ages 8-17) and parental informed consent (ages 5-17) to participate in the study
  • Ability to communicate with study staff in English or Luganda, or availability of a capable interpreter who is acceptable to the participant

排除标准

  • On treatment for, or diagnosed with but not yet treated for, active TB

研究组 & 干预措施

No intervention

No Intervention

Hotspot-focused ACF/TPT

Experimental

ACF/TPT intervention will be delivered in a community setting, in geographic areas judged likely to have a high burden of undiagnosed TB

干预措施: Active TB case finding with linkage to preventive therapy (ACF/TPT) (Other)

Facility-based ACF/TPT

Experimental

ACF/TPT intervention will be delivered on the grounds of a health facility (hospital or large public health center)

干预措施: Active TB case finding with linkage to preventive therapy (ACF/TPT) (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Pulmonary bacteriologically confirmed TB notifications, hotspot vs facility

时间窗: From the start to two weeks after the end of each four-month intervention period

Number of study region residents notified as initiating treatment for bacteriologically confirmed new or relapsed pulmonary TB, comparing periods in which regions performed hotspot-focused ACF/TPT to those in which facility-based ACF/TPT was performed.

次要结局

  • Number screened by study(During four-month intervention periods (6 periods per cluster over 48 months))
  • Number referred for TPT(During four-month intervention periods (6 periods per cluster over 48 months))
  • Study-initiated TB notifications, hotspot vs facility(From the start to two weeks after the end of each four-month intervention period)
  • Number diagnosed by study(During four-month intervention periods (6 periods per cluster over 48 months))
  • Number evaluated for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) with tuberculin skin testing (TST)(During four-month intervention periods (6 periods per cluster over 48 months))
  • Contacts screened(During four-month intervention periods (6 periods per cluster over 48 months))
  • Pulmonary bacteriologically confirmed TB notifications, ACF/TPT vs control(48 months from start of interventions in each "triplet" of clusters)
  • Notification trend (intervention vs control) as assessed by Average percent change in number of TB notifications(First 16 months following start of interventions in a cluster "triplet", versus final 16 months of the interventions (including 4 months of washout after the final intervention) in each triplet)
  • Cost effectiveness (hotspot vs facility) as assessed by cost per disability-adjusted life year averted(From the start to two weeks after the end of each four-month intervention period)
  • TPT initiations, hotspot vs facility(From the start to two weeks after the end of each four-month intervention period)
  • Cost effectiveness (ACF/TPT vs no intervention) as assessed by cost per disability-adjusted life year averted(From the start to two weeks after the end of each four-month intervention period)

研究者

发起方
Johns Hopkins University
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验