2nd International Survey on Interventional Strategies
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 500
- 主要终点
- Need for using any additional diagnostic tool
研究概览
简要总结
The study aims to evaluate the decision-making pathways of interventional cardiologists, when assessing patients, presented with stable coronary artery disease.
详细描述
2nd International Survey on Interventional Strategies is a web-based platform.
The survey contains specific questions and dedicated case presentations on two major topics.
The first part queries the characteristics of the participants, including overall experience in interventional cardiology, annual volume of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and duration of experience with quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), intravascular ultrasound (IVUS),optical coherence tomography (OCT), fractional flow reserve (FFR) and non-hyperaemic pressure ratios (NHPR). The survey uses here predefined categories and single-choice questions.
The second part investigates personal strategies for evaluating angiographically intermediate stenoses in the catheterization laboratory. Here, participants are asked to evaluate 5 complete coronary angiograms. All cases are characterised as stable angina without relevant changes on resting ECG. No information about non-invasive testing is known or provided.
Here participants are asked to (1) localise all relevant stenoses by indicating the involved segment; (2) define percent diameter stenosis (%DS) by visual estimate; and (3) determine the significance of the stenosis of interest. In cases of angiographic uncertainty, the preferred diagnostic tool is asked to be selected from the arsenal available in the catheterisation laboratory, namely QCA, IVUS, OCT, FFR or NHPR. Participants are asked to make their decisions assuming ideal world conditions, without considering any financial restrictions or local regulations, but only after the best clinical practice achievable in this virtual catheterisation laboratory.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Cohort
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- 未提供
排除标准
- 未提供
结局指标
主要结局
Need for using any additional diagnostic tool
时间窗: One month
It will be assessed, how often participants express their desire to use one or other additional diagnostic tool to make a decision about lesion significance
次要结局
- Accuracy of visually estimated lesion severity(One month)
- Need for using any additional diagnostic tool in different subgroups(One month)
研究者
Gabor Toth-Gayor
Principal Investigator
Medical University of Graz
