跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2026/02/104376
CTRI/2026/02/104376尚未招募Phase 3 4

A Comparitive Study between Plating vs 5 Pin technique in distal end radius fracture

SAKTHI KUMARAN A1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2026年3月7日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
Phase 3 4
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
60
试验地点
1

研究概览

简要总结

This prospective randomized study compares functional and radiological outcomes of plating versus the 5-pin percutaneous technique for distal radius fractures. Sixty patients aged 20–60 years were evaluated using QuickDASH, Mayo scoring, and Lidstrom radiological criteria. The study examines operative time, complications, stability, and rehabilitation differences. Plating offers rigid fixation but carries risks such as longer surgery, blood loss, and hardware-related issues, while the 5-pin technique aims to maintain radial height with fewer complications and faster recovery. Results assess which method provides superior overall outcomes.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Coin toss, Lottery, toss of dice, shuffling cards etc
盲法
Participant and Outcome Assessor Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
20.00 Year(s) 至 60.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • Patients age ( 20-60 years of age) patients with distal radius fractures that are displaced intra- and extra – articular are included in the study.
  • Open fracture grade 1and 2.

排除标准

  • Patients with ipsilateral upper limb injuries Patients with compound fractures ( grade 3) Age less than 20 and more than 60 Pathological fractures Patients with polytrauma with injury severity score greater than 16 points Patients with pre-existing medical disorders that affect bone physiology like a malignant tumor, hyperparathyroidism, vascular insufficiency of the upper limb, alcoholic or drug dependency.

研究者

发起方
SAKTHI KUMARAN A
申办方类型
Other [self]
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Sakthi kumaran A

SRM medical college and research centre

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验