Pharmacological Modulation of Belief Salience
试验速览
- 阶段
- 1 期
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 30
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Beliefs and Values Inventory (BVI)
研究概览
简要总结
To provide an initial test of the hypothesis that dopamine mediates the motivational salience of stimuli beyond simple stimulus-reinforcement associations, the researchers propose to undertake a study of the modulation of a) levels of agreement or disagreement with; b) the perceived self- relevance; and c) the perceived interest of propositions expressing beliefs and values in healthy male volunteers using Ii) a dopamine antagonist (the D2-blocker haloperidol), and (ii) a dopamine precursor L-Dopa to increase CNS dopamine transmission.
The researchers will also administer the Salience Attribution Task (SAT) which will allow researchers to assess reward-learning processing of simple stimuli using a reaction-time game. This task was utilised by Roiser et al in order to explore whether delusions in medicated patients with schizophrenia were related to impairments in associative learning. The authors hypothesised that associative learning was influenced by D2 receptor blockade. The researchers extend this approach to examine the effect of dopamine modulation on the SAT as a measure of associative learning, a basic neuropsychological process that may be involved in the attribution of salience to beliefs.
Finally, the researchers will ask participants to perform a within-subjects dictator game to understand the influence of dopaminergic manipulation of the live attribution of harm intention to partners. The task has been previously validated online. Participants will play against 3 partners in a random order in each drug condition. Each partner will play the participant for 6 trials. One partner will always be fair, one will always be unfair, and one will be 50% unfair. We aim to understand whether potentiating dopamine has an additive effect on the harm intention attributions toward partners, regardless of the behaviour of the partner.
详细描述
Delusions in psychiatry are viewed as a form of aberrant belief. Consequently it is important to understand the cognitive and neural processes involved in beliefs to provide insights into how these processes go awry in the formation of delusions. Beliefs have been defined as 'a disposition to express, assent to, or otherwise act in accordance with some proposition'. Some beliefs are widely held within a given society (e.g the earth revolves around the sun; eating humans is wrong), whereas others vary in association with subcultural and individual differences (e.g God created the universe; abortion is wrong). Similarly, the conviction or agreement with which an individual's beliefs and values are held may change over time, to the extent that some beliefs and values may be lost, and others acquired. Also, the perceived relevance of beliefs and values to oneself may vary. For example, beliefs that the 'earth revolves around the sun' and that 'global warming is occurring' may both be held with conviction, but the latter may be perceived as having higher relevance to the self in terms of risk, and potential life-style changes. Hence, self-relevance is a dimension of beliefs that is potentially dissociable from the conviction (level of agreement) with which a belief is held. Further, some propositions expressing beliefs and values may be regarded as more interesting than others. This raises the question of what neurobiological processes contribute to the sense of conviction for, and perceived self-relevance and interest of beliefs and values?
The mesolimbic dopamine system is a candidate neural system implicated in mediating the motivational salience of perceptions and ideas, 'whereby events and thoughts come to grab attention, drive action, and influence goal-directed behaviour because of their association with reward or punishment'. In human studies, haloperidol has been used to show that dopamine activity influences action-value estimates represented in the striatum during instrumental conditioning, as would be expected from earlier studies of feedback-based learning. Still other data suggest that brain regions rich in dopaminergic inputs play a role in processing the salience of rewarding events. What is not known is if these dopaminergic rich regions also modulate the motivational salience of more complex 'stimuli' including ideas and beliefs.
Main hypothesis:
Prediction 1:
At a neurobiological level, the hypothesis is that the mesolimbic dopamine system is recruited to tag representations (ideas and beliefs) as motivationally salient. Potentiation of dopamine transmission should increase salience of beliefs (as indicated by increases in agreement, self-relevance and interest toward propositions within science, paranormal, politics, moral, and religious themes in the Beliefs and Values Inventory while attenuation of dopamine transmission should be associated with decreased salience. Answers of items within themes will be summed to create summary scores that will be split by agreement, interest, and self-relevance dimensions.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Crossover
- 主要目的
- Basic Science
- 盲法
- Double (Participant, Investigator)
盲法说明
Double blind
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- Male
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Healthy males between the ages of 18-65
排除标准
- •History or current psychiatric or neurological illness, history or current serious medical diagnosis, BMI outside of normal/healthy range, smoker over 5 cigarettes per day, recent use of drugs, non-english speaker.
研究组 & 干预措施
Placebo
Placebo control
干预措施: Placebo - Cap (Drug)
Haloperidol 3mg
Haloperidol
干预措施: Haloperidol (Drug)
L-Dopa 150 mg & Domperidone 10mg
L-Dopa
干预措施: L-dopa (Drug)
结局指标
主要结局
Beliefs and Values Inventory (BVI)
时间窗: 12 Months
Change in score between conditions on the BVI. Scores will be summed by item totals within theme (paranormal, religion, morality, politics, and science) and dimension (agreement, self-relevance, and interest).
Salience Attribution Test (SAT)
时间窗: 12 Months
Change in attribution of explicit and implicit salience between conditions on the SAT.
Within-subjects dictator game
时间窗: 12 Months
Participants will play against three different partners, each for six trials. In each trial, the player's partner will have the option to either split or take 10p from the player, so that the player either ends up with 5p or 0p. Players will play against one partner that will always split the money, one that will always take all of the money, and one that will 50% of the time split the money. After each trial, the player will be asked on a scale of 1-100 (1 being not at all and 100 being completely): 1. How much do you think your partner was driven by a desire to increase their own bonus, and 2. How much do you think your partner was driven by a desire to reduce your bonus. Total of a. and b. will be added up for each style of partner for each arm.
次要结局
- Brief Oxford-Liverpool Inventory of Experiences and Feelings(6 Months)
- Big-5 Personality Questionnaire(6 Months)
