跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06142565
NCT06142565已完成不适用

Treatment of Postviral Olfactory Dysfunction

Karolinska Institutet2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 120 人开始时间: 2023年10月17日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
120
试验地点
2
主要终点
Subjective health

研究概览

简要总结

A decreased sense of smell (hyposmia) is often caused by viral infections, such as COVID-19. Today, the only recommended treatment for hyposmia is olfactory training, a time consuming method with limitations in terms of both compliance and effect. The aim of this study is therefore to evaluate, as well as optimize, a new treatment method for olfactory loss.

Hyposmic participants will be recruited and randomized into two different treatment conditions. One group will do regular olfactory training and the other will do passive olfactory training with scented nose plugs. The training will be conducted in the home of the individual monday through friday for two consecutive months. Subjective and objectvie measures of olfactory problems will be assessed before and after treatment, as well as subjective measures related to quality of live and genereal wellbeing.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 18 - 65 years old
  • Physically and cognitively capable of participating in the study
  • Having appropriate olfactory screening test scores (hyposmic)

排除标准

  • Individuals with other diagnoses that could affect the study results

结局指标

主要结局

Subjective health

时间窗: 2 months

Does the use of scented nose plugs increase the effect of olfactory training on subjective health compared to regular olfactory training? For this outcome, we will use the Self-Rated Health 5 measure and SF-36.

Objective olfactory function

时间窗: 2 months

Does the use of scented nose plugs increase the effect of olfactory training on objective olfactory function compared to regular olfactory training? For this outcome, we will use the standardized Sniffin' Sticks test to assess olfactory function.

Subjective degree of suffering from olfactory impairment

时间窗: 2 months

Does the use of scented nose plugs increase the effect of olfactory training on subjective degree of suffering from olfactory impairment compared to regular olfactory training? For this outcome, we will use the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders - Negative Statements.

Subjective parosmia

时间窗: 2 months

Does the use of scented nose plugs increase the effect of olfactory training on subjective parosmia compared to regular olfactory training? For this outcome, we will use the Landis parosmia questionnaire.

Subjective depressive symptoms

时间窗: 2 months

Does the use of scented nose plugs increase the effect of olfactory training on depressive symptoms compared to regular olfactory training? For this outcome, we will use the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI).

Subjective general wellbeing

时间窗: 2 months

Does the use of scented nose plugs increase the effect of olfactory training on depressive symptoms compared to regular olfactory training? For this outcome, we will use the General Well Being Schedule.

Subjective symptoms and social/emotional consequences

时间窗: 2 months

Does the use of scented nose plugs increase the effect of olfactory training on subjective symptoms and social/emotional consequences compared to regular olfactory training? For this outcome, we will use the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT).

Subjective olfactory function

时间窗: 2 months

Does the use of scented nose plugs increase the effect of olfactory training on subjective olfactory function compared to regular olfactory training? For this outcome, we will use the Self-Reported Mini Olfactory Questionnaire.

Compliance

时间窗: 2 months

Does the use of scented nose plugs increase the compliance of olfactory training compared to regular olfactory training? For this outcome, we will use questions asking the participants about their experience during the olfactory training, specifically targeting their compliance, such as how often they actually completed the olfactory training and how often they forgot to.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Johan Lundström

Professor

Karolinska Institutet

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验