跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06037200
NCT06037200招募中不适用

Evaluation of a Urin-based Point-of-Care Testing Device for Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Acute Ischemic or Hemorrhagic Stroke

University of Giessen1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 200 人开始时间: 2023年1月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
200
试验地点
1
主要终点
Time-benefit of urine-based POC-testing versus standard blood-based coagulation assessment

研究概览

简要总结

The goal of this study is to test a urine-based point-of-care testing device for direct oral anticoagulants in patients with stroke. The main questions are:

  • Can the test identify patients with direct oral anticoagulant intake?
  • Is there a time benefit of urine-based point-of-care testing compared to standard blood-based coagulation assessment?
  • Is the device feasible in the setting of acute stroke care?

详细描述

Stroke is the second leading cause of death worldwide and the most common cause of acquired disability in adulthood. During the acute phase of ischemic brain infarction, the goal of therapy is the rapid re-opening of the occluded vessel through recanalization procedures. This aims to restore blood flow to the penumbra, the tissue surrounding the infarct core with reduced blood supply, and prevent irreversible damage. Established approaches include systemic thrombolysis (intravenous thrombolysis, IVT) using Actilyse® (rt-PA), which is the only approved and proven effective therapy available within the first 4.5 hours. Mechanical thrombectomy (endovascular thrombectomy, EVT) has also been employed in recent years for highly selected patients with large vessel occlusion. However, this treatment requires interdisciplinary center structures and specialized imaging-based patient selection. Nonetheless, these patients also clearly benefit from prior or concomitant IVT, making it the foundation of stroke care in Germany and worldwide for decades.

The rate of patients eligible for IVT treatment remains improvable, stabilizing around 20% of all acute cerebral ischemia patients, depending on the center and region. Various reasons contribute to this, but among the primary causes for not considering IVT (besides contraindications such as delayed or unknown symptom onset window) is the growing fraction of patients (about 8%) who are on oral anticoagulation or cannot receive IVT due to the lack of exclusion thereof (e.g., in patients with altered consciousness or aphasia). Current estimates suggest that nearly 2 million people in Germany require oral anticoagulation, with an increasing trend.

Current Problem:

The availability of oral anticoagulation options includes Vitamin K antagonists (e.g., Marcumar) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). DOACs are classified into two subgroups based on their mechanism: Factor IIa inhibitors (e.g., Dabigatran) and Factor Xa inhibitors (e.g., Apixaban, Rivaroxaban, Edoxaban). For stroke treatment, it's crucial to know the presence and extent of anticoagulation because it significantly increases the risk of bleeding under additional IVT, rendering IVT contraindicated or requiring immediate hemostatic therapy in the event of bleeding. While reliable and rapid anticoagulation assessment is possible with Vitamin K antagonists using point-of-care (PoC) devices (e.g., CoaguCheks®), this is more challenging for DOAC patients.

The accurate determination or exclusion of anticoagulation is therapeutically relevant since it affects the administration of substance-specific antidotes like Idarucizumab (for Factor IIa inhibitors) and Andexanet alfa (for Factor Xa inhibitors). Urgently needed for DOAC patients with acute stroke symptoms, PoC devices are essential. Many of these patients, lacking the ability to assess drug levels, cannot receive IVT in a timely manner. This situation is particularly problematic when reliable information about DOAC usage is absent due to patient or caregiver inability to provide an accurate history.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patient age ≥18 years at the time of admission
  • Clinical diagnosis of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke.
  • Treatmet at our certified stroke-unit, University Hospital Giessen.
  • Phase 1 only: Confirmed intake of a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) for at least 48 hours (test group) or no intake of a DOAC (control group for specificity determination)
  • Phase II only, anamnestic intake of DOAC or no information about OAC-intake.
  • Phase II only, presentation with 4.5 hours after onset.
  • Exclusion Criteria (only Phase II):
  • Contraindications for intravenous thrombolysis other than intake of DOAC
  • large vessel occlusion with indication for immediate endovascular thrombectomy
  • chronic renal insufficiency with need for hemodialysis

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Time-benefit of urine-based POC-testing versus standard blood-based coagulation assessment

时间窗: 24 hours

i.e. difference between time delay of anti-Xa or Hemoclot testing (duration of blood sampling until result) and time delay of POC-test (duration of urine sampling until result)

次要结局

  • Rate of DOAC-test within 4.5 hours(24 hours)
  • Sensitivity of POC-test(24 hours)
  • Feasibility of POC test during acute stroke care(24 hours)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Stefan Gerner

Principal Investigator, Associate professor

University of Giessen

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验