Closed-Loop Neurofeedback Targeting the Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex for Cardiac Autonomic Modulation in Coronary Artery Disease With Anxiety - A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 招募中
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 56
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- The between-group difference (real neurofeedback vs sham) in baseline-corrected heart rate (HR) during the task stimulation window.
研究概览
简要总结
The goal of this clinical trial is to test whether real-time fNIRS-BCI neurofeedback targeting the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (right DLPFC), using active volitional control during a slow-wave auditory acoustic paradigm, can suppress cardiac sympathetic activity and improve autonomic regulation in right-handed patients with stable coronary heart disease (CHD) and comorbid DSM-5 anxiety.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does real neurofeedback, compared with sham, reduce baseline-corrected heart rate during the auditory stimulation window? Does real neurofeedback, compared with sham, increase HRV spectral power around 0.0167 Hz (1/60 Hz) and produce stronger suppression of right DLPFC activation? Does suppression of right DLPFC activation mediate the effect of group assignment on heart rate?
If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare the real neurofeedback group with the sham (non-contingent) feedback group, which uses identical audio and interface, to determine whether coupling feedback to right DLPFC activity yields autonomic benefits.
Participants will:
Complete eligibility screening in cardiology and psychiatry and provide informed consent; baseline demographics, medical history, vital signs, and medications are recorded (HAMA/HAMD used for eligibility only).
Undergo a 3-day adaptation phase to practice active volitional self-regulation while viewing a real-time energy bar mapped to right DLPFC statistics; adaptation data are not analyzed for outcomes.
Attend two formal sessions (Days 4-5), each with 15 blocks of 60 s (20 s rest + 40 s stimulus). The auditory stimulus is a 1 Hz amplitude-modulated pure tone at approximately 60 dB; 10-second white-noise bursts are randomly embedded within the 40-second window. During the stimulation period, participants receive real or sham feedback on right DLPFC activation and act to push the energy bar below an unlabeled threshold line using active volitional strategies.
Undergo synchronous fNIRS (HbO) and 3-lead ECG (1,000 Hz) recording throughout; online processing and rendering performance metrics are logged; adverse events are monitored and managed per protocol.
详细描述
This study is a randomised, sham-controlled, parallel-group neurofeedback trial designed to test whether real-time fNIRS-BCI targeting the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (right DLPFC), using active volitional control during a slow-wave auditory acoustic paradigm, can suppress cardiac sympathetic activity and improve autonomic regulation in right-handed patients with stable coronary heart disease and comorbid DSM-5 anxiety. Eligibility criteria, outcome measures, arms and interventions, and statistical analysis are specified in their dedicated fields of this record to avoid duplication.
Participants complete screening and a three-day adaptation phase, followed by two formal experimental sessions on consecutive days. No verbal guidance is provided on test days. During each formal session, participants undergo 15 block cycles of 60 seconds each, comprising 20 seconds of rest and 40 seconds of auditory stimulation. The auditory stimulus is a 1 Hz amplitude-modulated pure tone at approximately 60 dB. Within the 40-second window, a 10-second white-noise burst is randomly embedded while avoiding the first and last 2 seconds; start times are selected without replacement from a discrete set to minimise predictability and sequence effects and to probe interference resistance.
Neurofeedback targets the right DLPFC. Real-time statistical values of cortical activation are mapped to a visual energy bar that serves as the feedback signal. Participants use active volitional strategies to push the energy bar below an unlabeled threshold line during stimulation. In the real-feedback group the statistical threshold is set to T = -3.3, producing a sensitive, contingent mapping between right DLPFC activity and the energy bar. In the sham-feedback group the threshold is set to T = -1, weakening the effective coupling between neural state and on-screen feedback while keeping the interface identical. Only the session operator is aware of group assignment; outcome assessors and data analysts are blinded.
Signals are acquired synchronously. fNIRS uses a NirSmart system with 7 sources and 7 detectors forming 19 channels, dual wavelengths at 730 nm and 850 nm, source-detector separation of 3 cm, and an 11 Hz sampling rate with avalanche photodiode detectors. Optodes are positioned over bilateral prefrontal cortex using the 10-20 system with FPz as the central reference. Channels are co-registered to MNI space, with right DLPFC (Brodmann area 46) designated a priori as the region of interest; channels 11 and 13 represent right DLPFC for feedback, and channels 17 and 18 represent left DLPFC for reference. ECG is recorded using a 3-lead configuration at 1,000 Hz.
Online processing and feedback are implemented with the NeuroMind-NIRS pipeline. A MATLAB timer provides a fixed update cadence. The streaming architecture is layered into data, visualisation, control, and persistence channels. A sliding-window general linear model is applied to fNIRS signals with low-pass filtering, linear detrending, and within-window normalisation. A boxcar task regressor convolved with a canonical haemodynamic response function is used; the statistical readout at the end of each window updates the energy bar and threshold decision. Statistical inference is prioritised ahead of rendering within a fixed real-time budget to maintain a stable feedback cadence. Per-frame compute time, render time, total pipeline time, latency, and dropped-frame rate are logged. The acoustic stimulus is not triggered or gated by the statistical readout.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
盲法说明
Real Neurofeedback Group Participants receive real-time visual feedback based on activation of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (right DLPFC), computed with a stringent statistical threshold (T = -3.3). This threshold enables high-sensitivity coupling between neural activity and the energy bar displayed on screen. The interface omits numerical values, and participants are blinded to both group allocation and threshold settings, ensuring a causally interpretable closed-loop training.
Sham Neurofeedback Group Participants receive feedback using a lenient threshold (T = -1), greatly reducing the effective coupling between right DLPFC activation and the visual feedback. The screen interface is identical to the real group, and no numerical values are shown. Participants are blinded to their group and threshold settings, limiting the possibility of meaningful self-regulation.
Both groups undergo identical auditory stimulation paradigms, noise overlay protocols, and testing procedures
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Age >18 years, any sex.
- •Right-handed, with resting heart rate between 60 and 100 beats per minute.
- •Confirmed diagnosis of CHD, defined as at least one of the following:
- •(i) positive stress test; (ii) documented myocardial infarction (MI) with electrocardiographic changes and concurrent elevation of creatine kinase MB isoenzyme or troponin; (iii) angiographically confirmed coronary atherosclerosis with ≥50% stenosis in at least one coronary artery.
- •Diagnosis of an anxiety disorder according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5).
- •Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) score ≥16 and 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) score ≤17.
排除标准
- •Acute unstable angina.
- •Severe congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class IV).
- •Valvular heart disease.
- •History of atrial fibrillation.
- •Unstable blood pressure, defined as systolic blood pressure >180 mmHg or <90 mmHg.
- •Pregnancy.
- •History of unstable medical conditions, including cerebrovascular disease, dementia, hyperthyroidism, pulmonary disease, or malignancy. These are assessed through medical history, electronic health records, physical examination, and ECG findings.
- •High risk of suicide or homicide.
- •Presence of other psychiatric disorders, including psychotic disorders, bipolar disorder, or active substance use disorders.
- •Use of psychotropic medication within 1 month prior to enrolment, to avoid potential interference with haemodynamic measurements.
研究组 & 干预措施
Real Neurofeedback Group
Participants receive real-time visual feedback based on activation of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (right DLPFC), computed with a stringent statistical threshold (T = -3.3). This threshold enables high-sensitivity coupling between neural activity and the energy bar displayed on screen. The interface omits numerical values, and participants are blinded to both group allocation and threshold settings, ensuring a causally interpretable closed-loop training.
干预措施: Real-time fNIRS-ECG neurofeedback (Device)
Sham Neurofeedback Group
Participants receive feedback using a lenient threshold (T = -1), greatly reducing the effective coupling between right DLPFC activation and the visual feedback. The screen interface is identical to the real group, and no numerical values are shown. Participants are blinded to their group and threshold settings, limiting the possibility of meaningful self-regulation.
干预措施: Real-time fNIRS-ECG neurofeedback (Device)
结局指标
主要结局
The between-group difference (real neurofeedback vs sham) in baseline-corrected heart rate (HR) during the task stimulation window.
时间窗: The formal experimental phase (day 4 and 5).
次要结局
- Between-group difference in task-related activation of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (right DLPFC).(The formal experimental phase (day 4 and 5).)
- Between-group difference in HRV spectral power at 0.0167 Hz during the task stimulation window, based on wavelet time-frequency analysis.(The formal experimental phase (day 4 and 5).)
研究者
Lin Tao
Assoc.Prof.
Shenyang Medical College
