跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02581644
NCT02581644已完成不适用

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Belatacept (Nulojix®) Patient Alert Cards in Patients Following Renal Transplantation in European Economic Area Countries

Bristol-Myers Squibb8 个研究点 分布在 3 个国家目标入组 63 人开始时间: 2016年11月29日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
63
试验地点
8
主要终点
Patient survey: Proportion of patients with correct responses to behavioral questions

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of the study is to determine a) if the implementation of belatacept patient alert card (PAC) resulted in effective understanding of key safety messages and b) if the degree of understanding of key safety messages is associated with improved clinical and safety outcomes.

详细描述

3 sub studies: 2 Cross-Sectional and 1 retrospective chart review

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Case Only
时间视角
Cross Sectional

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patient survey (cohort 1):
  • Patients has taken belatacept within the previous 3 months for renal transplantation
  • Patient is over 18 years of age
  • HCP survey (cohort 2):
  • Physician or nurses working in nephrology centers, with at least 1 patient taking belatacept in the previous 6 months for renal transplantation (by prescribing, administering or by follow up)
  • Retrospective chart review study (cohort 3):
  • Patient survey questionnaire received, Informed Consent Form (ICF) signed (if required)

排除标准

  • Patient survey:
  • Patient has participated in a clinical trial for their renal condition in the previous 12 months
  • Currently an employee of BMS
  • HCP survey:
  • Physicians or nurse who have recruited patients for the Patient survey
  • Currently an employee of BMS

结局指标

主要结局

Patient survey: Proportion of patients with correct responses to behavioral questions

时间窗: At patient enrolment

HCP survey: Proportion of HCPs who have utilised the PAC, and the extent of its use

时间窗: Day 1

HCP survey: Levels of HCPs' knowledge and comprehension related to the important identified risks of infections and the need to screen for specific infection prior to initiating or administering belatacept

时间窗: Day 1

The percentage of HCPs with responses to each question in the HCP questionnaire that would indicate effectiveness of the PAC will be determined: who are aware of the PAC, use the PAC, level of knowledge and comprehension of the risks and mean scores for correct responses

HCP survey: Mean total score for correct responses

时间窗: Day 1

Patient survey: Proportion of patients treated with belatacept who are aware of the existence of the PAC

时间窗: At patient enrolment

HCP survey: Proportion of HCPs who prescribe or administer belatacept in nephrology centres who are aware of the PAC

时间窗: Day 1

Retrospective chart review study (clinical outcome study): Proportion of serious infections

时间窗: Upto 4 years

Patient survey : Proportion of patients treated with belatacept who have received the PAC

时间窗: At patient enrolment

Patient survey : Proportion of patients who have utilised the PAC, and the extent of its use

时间窗: At patient enrolment

Patient survey: Levels of patient knowledge and comprehension related to the important identified risks of belatacept treatment

时间窗: At patient enrolment

Patient survey: HCP-patient communication based on responses to specific questions

时间窗: At patient enrolment

Patient survey: Mean scores for correct responses for questions grouped by objectives

时间窗: At patient enrolment

Objectives: distribution, awareness, utility, utilization and knowledge

HCP survey: Behavior of HCPs based on responses to behavioral questions

时间窗: Day 1

HCP survey: Mean scores for correct responses for questions grouped by objectives

时间窗: Day 1

Objectives: distribution, awareness, utility, utilization and knowledge

次要结局

  • Major determinants of patients knowledge of the key messages contained in the belatacept PAC based on data collected in the patient questionnaire(At patient enrolment)
  • Retrospective chart review study (clinical outcome study) : mean time from symptom onset of infection to receipt of medical therapy(Upto 4 years)
  • Retrospective chart review study (clinical outcome study) : proportion of infections leading to discontinuation(Upto 4 years)
  • Retrospective chart review study (clinical outcome study) : Mean time to diagnosis of graft rejection by biopsy criteria(Upto 4 years)
  • Major determinants of understanding the key messages contained in the PAC based on data collected in the patient questionnaire(At patient enrolment)
  • Determinants of Health Care Professional (HCP) understanding and implementation regarding key messages contained in the PAC based on data collected in the patient questionnaire(Day 1)
  • Major determinants of implementation regarding the key messages contained in the PAC based on data collected in the patient questionnaire(At patient enrolment)

研究者

发起方
Bristol-Myers Squibb
申办方类型
Industry
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (8)

Loading locations...

相似试验