跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07526818
NCT07526818进行中(未招募)不适用

Comparison of Mechanical and Manual Glide Path Techniques for Electronic Working Length Measurement Using Built-in or Standalone Apex Locator: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Dow University of Health Sciences1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 104 人开始时间: 2026年3月26日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
进行中(未招募)
入组人数
104
试验地点
1
主要终点
Electronic working length (in millimeters) of root canals

研究概览

简要总结

This study is designed to compare two commonly used methods for measuring the length of the root canal during root canal treatment. Accurate measurement of the root canal is very important because it helps dentists clean, shape, and fill the canal properly, which improves the success of the treatment and reduces the risk of complications.

In this study, two different techniques will be evaluated. The first method uses small hand instruments (manual technique) to create a smooth pathway inside the root canal before measuring its length. The second method uses a machine-assisted system (mechanical technique) that creates this pathway automatically. Both methods use special electronic devices called apex locators, which help determine the exact length of the root canal more accurately than traditional X-rays alone.

Participants in this study will be patients who require root canal treatment on lower molar teeth. If you agree to take part, you will receive standard root canal treatment similar to routine dental care. The only difference is the method used to prepare the canal and measure its length, which will be randomly assigned. This means neither you nor the dentist will choose the method, ensuring fair comparison.

The procedure will include taking dental X-rays, administering local anesthesia, cleaning and shaping the root canal, and filling it after measurement. All steps follow standard dental practices and safety protocols. Your treatment will not be compromised in any way by participating in the study.

The purpose of this research is to determine which method is more accurate, efficient, and reliable. The results may help improve future dental treatments by guiding dentists toward better techniques, ultimately benefiting patients through safer and more effective care.

Participation in this study is completely voluntary. You have the right to refuse participation or withdraw at any time without affecting your dental treatment. All personal and medical information will be kept confidential and used only for research purposes.

There are minimal risks involved, as all procedures are part of routine root canal treatment. You may not receive direct personal benefit, but your participation will contribute to improving dental care for others in the future.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 60 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Aged 18 to 60 years.
  • Lower first permanent molars seeking root canal treatment.
  • Teeth exhibiting symptomatic irreversible pulpitis with normal periapical tissues.
  • Teeth with mature apex.
  • 3 visible canals from orifice to apex.

排除标准

  • Teeth with metallic restorations or previous root treated teeth.
  • Fractured , teeth with immature apices, or developmental anomalies.
  • Systemic disease and immune deficiency.
  • Canals where the mechanical glide path could not be established.
  • Teeth with canal calcification or root resorption.

研究组 & 干预措施

Group 1: Control

Active Comparator

Group 1( Control): ): Manual glide path with size 10 K-file, working length determined by Root ZX II, confirmed radiographically.

干预措施: Electronic Apex locators (Device)

Group 2: Intervention

Experimental

Group 2 (Intervention): Mechanical glide path using E-connect S+ with auto apical stop function, confirmed radiographically

干预措施: Endomotor with built-in apex locator E Connect S+ (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

Electronic working length (in millimeters) of root canals

时间窗: 1 hour.

The primary outcome measure is the electronic working length (in millimeters) of root canals as determined by either a standalone apex locator or an endomotor with built-in apex locator, following manual or mechanical glide path preparation.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr. Amrita

Principal Investigator

Dow University of Health Sciences

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Comparison of Manual and Mechanical Glide Path... | 临床试验