跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04107909
NCT04107909Unknown不适用

Three-port Versus Four-port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Comparative Study

Assiut University0 个研究点目标入组 100 人开始时间: 2019年12月30日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
100
主要终点
compare between the prognosis of three port and four port laproscpic cholecyctectomy

研究概览

简要总结

Various modifications have been tried in laparoscopic cholecystectomy since its introduction. One, two and three port LC have been performed on limited scale. we aim to compare three port LC with four port LC in patients with cholelithiasis. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the outcome of 3 ports LC for treatment of cholelithiasis by comparing the result with 4 ports LC with respect to safety and efficacy.

详细描述

Various modifications have been tried in laparoscopic cholecystectomy since its introduction. One, two and three port LC have been performed on limited scale. we aim was to compare three port LC with four port LC in patients with cholelithiasis. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the outcome of 3 ports LC for treatment of cholelithiasis by comparing the result with 4 To study the efficacy and feasibility of 3 port and 4 port lap cholecystetctomy.

  1. To compare the intraoperative and post-operative complications of 3 port and 4 port lap cholecystectomy

  2. Operative time,

  3. Days of hospital stay.

  4. complication

  5. post-operative pain ports LC with respect to safety and efficacy.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
Single (Investigator)

入排标准

年龄范围
25 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age of patient between 25 and 65 years
  • Diagnosis of chronic cholecystitis, symptomatic cholelithiasis

排除标准

  • Choledocholithiasis
  • Severe Acute Calculus Pancreatitis
  • Severe co-morbid conditions (uncontrolled diabetes, Hypertension, severe direct hyper bilirubinemia) 4 . Previous operation or adhesion

研究组 & 干预措施

3 ports

Other

3port operation

干预措施: laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Procedure)

4 port

Other

4 port operation

干预措施: laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

compare between the prognosis of three port and four port laproscpic cholecyctectomy

时间窗: 3 years

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Mohamed Ali Abdelfatah Elshreef

general surgery

Assiut University

相似试验