A randomized controlled trial to compare the hemodynamic response to orotracheal intubation with c-mac video laryngoscope versus c-mac video stylet in adults receiving general anesthesia for elective surgery
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 入组人数
- 60
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- To compare the hemodynamic response (Systolic blood pressure ) orotracheal intubation using C-MAC video laryngoscope and C-MAC video stylet in ASA grade I adult patients receiving general anaesthesia for elective surgery
研究概览
简要总结
Laryngoscopy and intubation stimulate the sympathetic nervous system causing an increase in heart rate, blood pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and intracranial pressure. This hemodynamic response is transient, and is well tolerated by healthy individuals but can have deleterious consequences in high-risk patients such as those with hypertension, coronary artery diseases, intracranial space occupying lesion etc. Video laryngoscopy is now becoming a preferred method of tracheal intubation with its improved visualization and widespread availability. However, previous literature has shown that hemodynamic response to video laryngoscopy is similar to that of direct laryngoscopy as both the devices involve introduction of blades into the laryngopharynx exerting pressure to the base of the tongue, lodgment in the vallecula and elevation of the epiglottis**.**
C-MAC Video stylet with a deflectable tip has been recently introduced to facilitate orotracheal intubation in adults. It is an optical stylet that allows indirect view of laryngopharyngeal structures without exerting pressure on the adjoining tissues. However, introduction of the stylet into the oral cavity requires application of jaw thrust or manual lifting of the mandible by hooking the lower jaw to create a pharyngeal space in order to facilitate visualization of glottis. These maneuvers are also known to elicit a sympathetic response, however, there is no research comparing the hemodynamic response of video laryngoscopy versus video stylet intubation which involves manual displacement of the jaw.
There is paucity of literature comparing the hemodynamic responseto orotracheal intubation by C-MAC video laryngoscope versus C-MAC video stylet in adult patients receiving general anaesthesia for elective surgery.
Our study will help us identify if there is any difference in the hemodynamic response to orotracheal intubation using C-MAC video laryngoscope compared to C-MAC video stylet in adult patients receiving general anaesthesia for elective surgery and thus select appropriate laryngoscope for intubation in high risk patients.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Computer generated randomization
- 盲法
- Participant Blinded
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 60.00 Year(s)(—)
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •ASA physical status 1
- •Elective surgery.
排除标准
- •Anticipated difficult airway
- •Upper respiratory tract infection
- •Patients with high risk for aspiration such as hiatal hernia, gut surgeries.
结局指标
主要结局
To compare the hemodynamic response (Systolic blood pressure ) orotracheal intubation using C-MAC video laryngoscope and C-MAC video stylet in ASA grade I adult patients receiving general anaesthesia for elective surgery
时间窗: At preinduction and 1 minute after tracheal intubation
次要结局
- To compare orotracheal intubation using C-MAC video laryngoscope or video stylet in ASA grade I adult patients receiving general anaesthesia for elective surgery with regards to the changes in SBP, HR, DBP, MAP(At following time intervals)
- To compare orotracheal intubation using C-MAC video laryngoscope or video stylet in ASA grade I adult patients receiving general anaesthesia for elective surgery with regards to time taken for tracheal intubation defined as the time from introduction of laryngoscope to the time of first capnography trace.
- To compare orotracheal intubation using C-MAC video laryngoscope or video stylet in ASA grade I adult patients receiving general anaesthesia for elective surgery with regards to number of failed intubation(Failure of intubation shall be defined if more than two attempts are taken to secure the)
- To compare orotracheal intubation using C-MAC video laryngoscope or video stylet in ASA grade I adult patients receiving general anaesthesia for elective surgery with regards to number of patients requiring Optimal External Laryngeal Manipulation for achieving successful intubation in each group(OELM shall be allowed for achieving successful intubation & number of patients)
- To compare orotracheal intubation using C-MAC video laryngoscope or video stylet in ASA grade I adult patients receiving general anaesthesia for elective surgery with regards to number of patients with Orodental trauma(Tracheal Intubation)
