跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06225180
NCT06225180终止不适用

Review of Breast Abscess Management

Methodist Health System2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 500 人开始时间: 2023年6月29日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
终止
入组人数
500
试验地点
2
主要终点
Number of repeat interventions prior to resolution of abscess(s)

研究概览

简要总结

Breast abscesses are an unfortunate pathology that develop in patients, and treatment is often painful and unpleasant. The goal of this study is to identify risk factors associated with failure of aspiration as a primary intervention as opposed to incision and drainage in the hopes of adequately treating patients at initial presentation.

详细描述

The pendulum has now swung toward minimally invasive aspiration as the primary treatment modality, with multiple studies reporting superior cosmetic results. However, patients in these studies often required repeat breast aspirations, and sometimes ultimately required incision and drainage. Aspiration first for treatment of breast abscess may not be a wise choice for all patients if it results in increased antibiotic days, return to emergency department (ED)/increased cost, or prolonged pain from multiple procedures. Several studies have identified varying risk factors for aspiration failure as primary intervention for breast abscesses. More data is needed to confirm the true risk factors for failure.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Retrospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 75 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • • ≥18 years of age
  • New diagnosis of N61.1 recorded in their Electronic Medical Record (EMR)

排除标准

  • • <18 years of age
  • Incarcerated

结局指标

主要结局

Number of repeat interventions prior to resolution of abscess(s)

时间窗: 5 years

Determine the superiority of aspiration vs incision as primary intervention in treatment of breast abscesses

次要结局

  • Antibiotic days(5 years)
  • Repeat aspiration(5 years)
  • Return to Emergency Department ( ED)(5 years)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验