跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07755787
NCT07755787尚未招募不适用

Prospective Evaluation of Ultrasonographic Diagnostics for Monitoring Skeletal Fracture Healing in Pediatric Patients: A Comparative Study With Conventional Radiography

University Hospital Hradec Kralove1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 1,200 人开始时间: 2026年9月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
1,200
试验地点
1
主要终点
Diagnostic accuracy of the Pediatric Long-bone Ultrasound Score (PLUS) compared to conventional radiography

研究概览

简要总结

This observational study investigates whether ultrasound can safely and accurately monitor the healing of bone fractures in children, comparing it to standard X-rays. Currently, children with fractures often require multiple X-rays during their recovery, which exposes them to small amounts of ionizing radiation. Ultrasound, on the other hand, is completely radiation-free.

The study aims to evaluate a specific ultrasound scoring system called the PLUS (Pediatric Long-bone Ultrasound Score) score. The study will include pediatric patients who are being treated conservatively (e.g., with a cast) for a long bone fracture, fractures of the sternum, patella and clavicle. During their regularly scheduled follow-up visits, participants will receive a brief ultrasound scan of the fracture site in addition to their standard clinical and X-ray examinations. The medical decisions regarding the patient's treatment will continue to be based entirely on standard care.

The main goal is to determine if the ultrasound PLUS score strongly correlates with the X-ray findings. If proven accurate, this scoring system could help reduce the need for routine X-rays in the future, thereby minimizing radiation exposure and potentially streamlining outpatient workflow.

详细描述

Routine monitoring of pediatric fracture healing relies heavily on conventional radiography. While effective, it exposes growing children to cumulative ionizing radiation. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) represents a promising, radiation-free, and easily accessible alternative for assessing callus formation and bone bridging. To standardize this ultrasound evaluation, specific scoring systems, such as the PLUS score, have been developed.

This prospective observational cohort study is designed to validate the clinical utility and diagnostic accuracy of the PLUS score in pediatric patients treated conservatively for long bone fractures, fractures of the sternum, patella and clavicle.

Methodology:

Patients presenting at the outpatient clinic with conservatively managed long bone fractures, fractures of the sternum, patella and clavicle will be consecutively enrolled. During their standard scheduled follow-up visits, patients will undergo routine care, including clinical evaluation and conventional radiography, to determine clinical and radiological union (e.g., indication for cast removal). Concurrently, an ultrasound examination will be performed to assess the fracture site and calculate the PLUS score.

The study is purely observational. The ultrasound findings will not alter the standard of care; all clinical decisions regarding treatment and immobilization removal will remain strictly based on standard clinical and radiographic assessments.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
0 Years 至 14 Years(Child)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age 0 to 14 years.
  • Acute fracture of a clavicle, sternum, patella, or long bone.
  • Conservative treatment planned or ongoing, including closed reduction and immobilization/casting.
  • Scheduled for routine outpatient follow-up with clinical and radiographic assessment.
  • Written informed consent from parent/legal guardian, with child assent when appropriate.

排除标准

  • Fractures treated surgically, including internal or external fixation.
  • Pathological fractures.
  • Metabolic bone disease or known bone fragility disorder.
  • Severe polytrauma or unstable clinical condition.
  • Inability to complete follow-up or non-compliance with study procedures.

研究组 & 干预措施

Conservatively treated pediatric fractures

Pediatric patients treated conservatively for a fracture of a long bone, clavicle, patella, or sternum. During their standard scheduled outpatient follow-up visits, participants will undergo routine clinical evaluation and conventional radiography to monitor bone healing. Concurrently, a point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) examination of the fracture site will be performed to calculate the Pediatric Long-bone Ultrasound Score (PLUS). The ultrasound assessment is strictly observational and does not alter standard medical care or clinical decision-making.

干预措施: Point-of-care ultrasound (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Diagnostic accuracy of the Pediatric Long-bone Ultrasound Score (PLUS) compared to conventional radiography

时间窗: At the routine follow-up visit when fracture union is expected, usually 3 to 8 weeks after injury.

The primary outcome is the diagnostic accuracy of the ultrasound-based PLUS (Pediatric Long-bone Ultrasound Score) in identifying fracture union, compared with the reference standard of clinical assessment and conventional radiography. Accuracy will be quantified using sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to determine the optimal PLUS cut-off for safely declaring union.

次要结局

  • Inter-rater reliability of the PLUS ultrasound score(Assessed throughout the study period at the routine follow-up visit when fracture union is anticipated (typically 3 to 8 weeks post-injury).)
  • Influence of biological sex and pubertal stage on fracture healing dynamics(Assessed from injury until documented fracture union, typically within 3 to 8 weeks post-injury, depending on fracture type and patient age.)
  • Impact of ultrasound-based follow-up on outpatient workflow efficiency(Assessed at each routine outpatient follow-up visit during the study period, typically within 3 to 8 weeks after injury.)
  • Association between maximum callus thickness and fracture union(Assessed at the routine follow-up visit when fracture union is anticipated, typically 3 to 8 weeks post-injury.)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验