跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04578821
NCT04578821已完成不适用

The Effect of Advocacy Education on Developing Social Justice Advocacy Skills and Ethical Sensitivity in Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Randomized Controlled Study

Nesime Demirören2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 80 人开始时间: 2019年9月26日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
80
试验地点
2
主要终点
Social Justice Advocacy Scale score level

研究概览

简要总结

The aim of this study is to determine the effect of advocacy education on social justice advocacy skills and ethical sensitivity in undergraduate nursing students.

详细描述

Advocacy is an effort to correct or change situations that affect people, society and systems.The origin of advocacy is to provide active support in the Latin "Advocates" dictionary. It is defined as "defense work" in Turkish dictionary advocacy is an ethical dimension of nursing practices in nursing science that shows how nursing care is needed and how the nurse will approach the individual, group and society in need.Social justice advocacy has an increasing importance as people are affected by pressure from the social system.Disease, weakness and early deaths are more common in ethnic and diverse races, poor people and societies that do not receive services.Within the scope of advocacy, the duties and responsibilities of individuals, families and society have been determined by laws and regulations in order to protect and improve the health of the society. Advocacy is the nurse's professional role and ethical responsibility.Total 80 students (İntervention and control group)was selected randomly from 112 4 th grade student. Students were randomly assigned to the experimental group(n=40) and the control group(n=40). The experimental group students will take advocacy intervention courses The control group students will the routine curriculum. In this study, effect size will be determined with 5% error margin by using sample size power analysis Gpower 3.1.9.2 program. Accordingly, it was calculated that 35 students were included in the intervention and control groups with 5% error margin and 80% power. İt was decided to include at least 40 people in each working group with 20% surplus, considering that they might be lost in data collection. Theoretical education, film and video screening, case study, Social Security Institution (SSİ) Study, WEB based work, The student will preparation of advocacy action plan, students prepared poster and advocacy awareness activity, poster were exhibited at the campus. Data Collection Tools: Student Information Form, Social Justice Advocacy Scale , Moral-Ethical Sensitivity Scale. Statistical Analysis:Similarity of experimental and control groups; number, percentage, average and standard deviation, pre-test, post test; scale scores difference in dependent groups t-test.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

Outcomes Assessor

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Student who speak very well Turkish

排除标准

  • Foreign students who do not speak very well Turkish.

结局指标

主要结局

Social Justice Advocacy Scale score level

时间窗: At the beginning of advocacy education, an avarage of 1 hour

Score level of social justice advocacy skill before advocacy education

Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire score level

时间窗: At the beginning of advocacy education, an avarage of 1 hour

Score level of moral sensitivity questionnaire before advocacy education. Similarity of experimental and control groups; number, percentage, average and standard deviation.

次要结局

  • Social Justice Advocacy Scale(12 weeks)
  • Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire(12 weeks)

研究者

发起方
Nesime Demirören
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor Investigator
主要研究者

Nesime Demirören

Lecturer

Necmettin Erbakan University

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验