A Randomized Crossover Study to Compare the Critical Thinking of Medical Students When Using Video-based or Written Cases
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 28
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Overall ratio of deep to superficial thinking
研究概览
简要总结
This study is designed to examine how the type of learning case affects the thinking of medical students in tutorial
详细描述
Tutorials at Harvard Medical School use problem-based learning with written cases. Students work in groups under the supervision of a tutor who guides their exploration of the material. As students progress through the curriculum there is an opportunity to advance the complexity of the material they are presented with. Video-based patient case studies have been shown to improve critical thinking ratios in paediatric medical student problem-based learning exercises, and time spent on data exploration, theory building and theory evaluation in postgraduate residency programs. We hypothesize that video provides a stimulus that improves cognitive processing and critical thinking among medical students, as compared to working from the text-based transcript of the same case.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Crossover
- 主要目的
- Health Services Research
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •medical student participating in the endocrine and reproductive pathophysiology course at Harvard Medical School
排除标准
- 未提供
结局指标
主要结局
Overall ratio of deep to superficial thinking
时间窗: Four 90-minute tutorial sessions
Depth of thinking will be evaluated using the method of Kamin et al. Transcription of each tutorial will be divided into utterances. Each utterance will be coded for depth of thinking (deep vs. superficial). The ratio of deep to superficial thinking by case modality will be reported.
次要结局
- Distribution of learning activities(Four 90-min tutorial sessions)
- Preferences of students for each case modality(5 weeks)
- Preferences of tutors for each case modality(5 weeks)
