跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03379948
NCT03379948Unknown不适用

Central and Peripheral Venous Catheters Associated Blood Stream Infection in the Critically Ill Patients in Assiut University Hospital

Assiut University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 50 人开始时间: 2018年2月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
50
试验地点
1
主要终点
compare the infectious complications of peripheral versus central venous catheters in critically ill patients

研究概览

简要总结

Catheter related infections (CRIs) were found to be associated with several risk factors, including patient related risk factors such as age, gender, clinical status and catheter related risk factors such as the vascular access location, dwelling time, catheter type and number of lumens. In addition to the inserted solution type and the experience of the professional who performs the procedure ,These factors constitute important strategic points for actions to compare the infectious complications of peripheral versus central venous catheters in critically ill patients.

详细描述

Nosocomial (hospital-acquired) bloodstream infections (BSIs) are an important cause of morbidity and mortality, with an estimated 250,000 cases occurring each year in the United States.

BSIs may be either primary or secondary. Secondary infections are related to infections at other sites, such as the urinary tract, lung, postoperative wounds, and skin. Most nosocomial BSIs are primary, as illustrated by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance system, in which 64 percent of the nosocomial BSIs reported were primary BSIs. While some primary BSIs have no identifiable source, most are associated with intravascular catheters, and central venous catheters (CVCs) in particular.

Critically ill patients require intravenous administration of fluids and drugs.This can be achieved via peripheral or central catheters. Each device is associated with both mechanical and infectious complications. Complications associated with central lines are judged to be more severe. Some patients actually require the insertion of a central line due to the venous toxicity of the drugs or to the necessity of making sure that the infusion is regularly administered (example: high dose catecholamine infusion). Some physicians believe that most Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients should have a central venous line inserted, whereas others feel that some patients may receive active drugs via a peripheral line in selected instances.

Endpoints are the rate of mechanical complications (difficulty in inserting the line, need for repeat insertion attempts, occurrence of arterial puncture, occurrence of pneumothorax) and of infectious complications (local catheter infection or catheter-related bloodstream infection).

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Other
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • All patient at ICU Diagnosed nosocomial infection

排除标准

  • Patients exist already infected before admission at hospital.

结局指标

主要结局

compare the infectious complications of peripheral versus central venous catheters in critically ill patients

时间窗: 7 days

by blood sample

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Shaimaa Nassar Abd El Hameed Ali

principal investigator

Assiut University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验