L'Utilizzo Della realtà Virtuale Mediante l'Impiego Del Visore Ottico Nel Paziente Oncologico Sottoposto al Posizionamento di PICC e PICC-PORT
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 120
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Change in pain (VAS, 0-10) from pre-procedure to post-procedure
研究概览
简要总结
Virtual reality (VR) has increasingly been explored in medical settings as a non-pharmacological intervention for the management of pain and anxiety associated with invasive procedures. By providing immersive and interactive environments, VR is thought to modulate both sensory and emotional components of pain through mechanisms involving focused attention, cognitive engagement, and altered perception, which share similarities with hypnosis-based approaches. Evidence from previous studies, initially conducted mainly in paediatric populations and more recently extended to adults, suggests that VR may effectively reduce procedural anxiety and pain without increasing procedural duration or clinical workload.
Oncology patients undergoing the placement of vascular access devices, such as peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) and PICC-PORTs, frequently experience procedural distress, including anxiety and discomfort, related to the invasive nature of the intervention. Procedural anxiety may negatively influence patient experience, cooperation, and overall tolerance of the procedure, potentially increasing the need for pharmacological anxiolytic or analgesic support. Identifying effective, safe, and easily applicable non-pharmacological strategies to reduce distress during these procedures represents a relevant clinical goal in oncology care.
The present study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of virtual reality delivered via a head-mounted display in reducing patient-reported anxiety and pain in adult oncology patients undergoing PICC or PICC-PORT insertion.
This study is designed as a prospective, interventional, randomised controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio using an independent, certified web-based randomisation service. Approximately 120 patients will be enrolled at a single centre, the Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IRCCS), and randomly assigned to one of two study arms. Participants allocated to the intervention arm will receive VR in addition to the standard of care (VR + SOC) throughout the vascular access placement procedure, while participants in the control arm will undergo the standard procedure alone (SOC).
The VR intervention will be delivered using HypnoVR, a software-based medical device classified as Class I, non-sterile, and compliant with Regulation (EU) 2017/745 on Medical Devices. The intervention will be administered via a head-mounted display with audiovisual content designed to promote relaxation, focused attention, and emotional regulation during the procedure.
The primary outcome of this study is a composite patient-reported procedural experience endpoint, assessed immediately after the procedure. The primary analytical component of this composite endpoint is procedural anxiety, measured using a 10-point Visual Analogue Scale for Anxiety (VAS-A). The main statistical analysis will compare changes in VAS-A scores between the intervention group and the control group.
The additional dimensions of the composite endpoint, patient-reported comfort, satisfaction and procedural tolerability, are collected concurrently and are not aggregated into a single score. These dimensions are analysed separately and interpreted jointly with procedural anxiety in order to provide an overall assessment of the patient's procedural experience.
Secondary outcomes include: 1) procedural pain, assessed using a 10-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS); 2) physiological parameters, including heart rate and arterial blood pressure; 3) procedural characteristics, such as procedure duration and number of device insertion attempts; 4) qualitative assessment of patients' perceptions and lived experiences of the procedure, analysed using Van Kaam's phenomenological method18.
Data collection will include both quantitative and qualitative measures within a mixed-methods framework. Quantitative data will be analysed using descriptive and inferential statistical methods to assess differences between study groups, while qualitative data derived from semi-structured interviews will be analysed using the Van Kaam phenomenological method to explore patients' lived experiences. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of an immersive virtual reality intervention on the overall procedural experience of adult oncology patients undergoing PICC and PICC-PORT placement, with patient experience conceived as a primary dimension of quality of care.
详细描述
BACKGROUND
In recent years, virtual reality (VR) has found increasingly widespread and innovative applications in the field of medicine, particularly within rehabilitation pathways, medical education, and the management of mental health conditions as well as chronic and acute pain. Numerous studies have demonstrated that the immersive experience created by VR restricts individuals' cognitive capacity to process acute pain and anxiety, and that this approach is more effective than simpler distraction-based methods.
The modulation of anxiety and pain through the use of VR is enabled by mechanisms associated with hypnosis, attentional shifting, and skills acquisition. Hypnosis aims to divert patients' attention away from painful and anxiety-provoking stimuli by immersing them in a virtual environment. The sensory and cognitive hypnotic mechanisms offered by VR lead to diversion of pain signals and interference with their processing at the level of the neuromatrix. Distraction represents a dispersion of attention towards multiple, uncontrolled stimuli, reducing voluntary attentional capacity; in contrast, hypnosis is characterised by a state of focused attention and heightened suggestibility, in which individuals remain conscious while intentionally directing their internal focus. Relaxing virtual environments are capable of modulating emotional responses, reducing both pain and anxiety, while active engagement enhances perceived control and further decreases pain perception. VR is able to influence brain activity by modulating neuromatrix responses to pain and by providing an integrated experience capable of acting across multiple dimensions.
Anxiety and pain are among the most frequently reported sensations before and during vascular access placement, in both paediatric and adult populations. However, the majority of existing literature focuses on the use of VR as a non-pharmacological distraction technique primarily in paediatric patients, largely neglecting its application in adult patients undergoing similar procedures.
The use of VR delivered through a head-mounted display during vascular access placement, specifically PICC and PICC-PORT insertion, in adult populations is only marginally reported in the literature. A prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled study demonstrated reductions in anxiety and pain among patients exposed to VR compared with standard care, without prolonging procedural time and with a reduction in the use of anaesthetic and analgesic agents. However, this study also highlighted that several factors influence patients' responses and the applicability of VR. Individual characteristics such as mood, personality, expectations, and previous experiences may affect responsiveness to VR. Nevertheless, VR represents a valid and promising non-pharmacological alternative for procedural sedation.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Supportive Care
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Adults aged 18 years or older
- •Diagnosis of neoplastic disease (solid or haematological malignancy)
- •Patients scheduled for peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) or PICC-PORT placement
- •Ability to understand the Italian language
- •Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent
排除标准
- •Refusal to participate in the study
- •Inability to provide informed consent
- •Visual or auditory impairments that may interfere with the use of a virtual reality head-mounted display
- •Sensory deficits involving the anatomical area affected by the procedure
- •Cognitive, neurological, or psychiatric disorders that may compromise comprehension, cooperation, or reliability of patient-reported outcomes
- •Any condition judged by the investigator to make participation unsafe or inappropriate
研究组 & 干预措施
Arm B: Standard of Care (SOC)
Patients will undergo standard care for PICC or PICC-PORT placement without VR.
Arm A: Virtual reality + Standard of care (VR+SOC)
Patients will receive standard care for PICC or PICC-PORT placement, combined with VR delivered via a head-mounted display throughout the procedure.The VR system used is HypnoVR, developed by Medival s.r.l. and include a VR headset, Lenovo tablet, and Bluetooth headphones.
HypnoVR integrates clinical hypnosis with immersive virtual environments, guided breathing, music therapy-based compositions, and cardiac coherence techniques, providing multisensory therapeutic immersion. Continuous communication with patients will be maintained throughout the session, and patients may select preferred visual and musical environments.
干预措施: Virtual reality VR (Device)
结局指标
主要结局
Change in pain (VAS, 0-10) from pre-procedure to post-procedure
时间窗: Baseline (pre-procedure, day1) and immediately after the procedure (end of procedure, day1).
The change in pain score (VAS) is calculated as the difference between the post-procedure and pre-procedure values. Positive change scores indicate an increase, and negative change scores indicate a decrease
Patient comfort (1-4 Likert)
时间窗: Immediately after the procedure (end of procedure, day1).
Single-item rating of comfort during procedure (1=not at all to 4=very)
Patient-reported satisfaction
时间窗: Immediately after the procedure (end of procedure, day1).
10-point Visual Analogue Scale ranging from 0 (not at all satisfied) to 10 (completely satisfied). Assessed post-procedure (T1).
Procedural tolerability
时间窗: Immediately after the procedure (end of procedure, day1).
5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (very poor) to 5 (excellent).
Composite patient-reported procedural experience endpoint
时间窗: Baseline (pre-procedure, day1) and immediately after PICC/PICC-PORT placement (end of procedure, day1).
Composite endpoint integrating multiple dimensions of procedural experience, including change in procedural anxiety (principal quantitative driver, measured using the 10-point VAS-A), patient-reported comfort, satisfaction, and procedural tolerability. Assessed immediately post-procedure (T1). The component dimensions are analysed as individual, non-aggregated measures and interpreted jointly. No numerical aggregation of component scores is applied
Procedural anxiety (principal quantitative driver)
时间窗: Baseline (pre-procedure, day1) and immediately after the procedure (end of procedure, day1).
10-point Visual Analogue Scale for Anxiety (VAS-A), ranging from 0 (no anxiety) to 10 (worst possible anxiety). Assessed pre-procedure (T0) and post-procedure (T1); change score is the primary focus of analysis.
Change in anxiety (VAS-A, 0-10) from pre-procedure to post-procedure
时间窗: Baseline (pre-procedure, same day) and immediately after PICC/PICC-PORT placement (end of procedure, same day).
The change in anxiety score (VAS-A) is calculated as the difference between the post-procedure and pre-procedure values. Positive change scores indicate an increase in anxiety, and negative change scores indicate a decrease.
Change in pain (VAS, 0-10) from pre-procedure to post-procedure
时间窗: Baseline (pre-procedure, same day) and immediately after the procedure (end of procedure, same day).
The change in pain score (VAS) is calculated as the difference between the post-procedure and pre-procedure values. Positive change scores indicate an increase, and negative change scores indicate a decrease.
Patient comfort (1-4 Likert)
时间窗: Immediately after the procedure (end of procedure, same day).
Single-item rating of comfort during procedure (1=not at all to 4=very)
次要结局
- Change in heart rate (beats per minute) from baseline to end of procedure(Baseline (pre-procedure, day1) and end of procedure (day1).)
- Change in mean arterial pressure (mmHg) from baseline to end of procedure(Baseline (pre-procedure, day1) and end of procedure (day1).)
- Qualitative Interview(Post-procedure, Assessed once within 15 to 30 minutes after device placement.)
- Procedural characteristics(Measured from the start to the end of the procedure, recorded immediately after procedure completion.)
- Perceived helpfulness of intervention (1-4 Likert)(Immediately after the procedure (end of procedure, same day).)
- Change in heart rate (beats per minute) from baseline to end of procedure(Baseline (pre-procedure, same day) and end of procedure (same day).)
- Change in mean arterial pressure (mmHg) from baseline to end of procedure(Baseline (pre-procedure, same day) and end of procedure (same day).)
- Qualitative Interview(From 24 to 48 hours after the procedure.)
研究者
Paola Tiatto
Coordinatrice Infermieristica U.O. Anestesia e Rianimazione IOV Sede di Castelfranco Veneto
Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS
