跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06374225
NCT06374225已完成不适用

Strategy to Avoid Excessive Oxygen Using an Autonomous Oxygen Titration Intervention (SAVE-O2 AI)

University of Colorado, Denver8 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 300 人开始时间: 2024年4月29日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
300
试验地点
8
主要终点
Proportion of time spent within the targeted normoxemia range

研究概览

简要总结

This study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of a closed loop/autonomous oxygen titration system (O2matic PRO100) to maintain normoxemia (goal range SpO2 90-96%, target 93%) during the first 72 hours of acute injury or illness, compared to standard provider-driven methods (manual titration with SpO2 target of 90-96%).

详细描述

Ensuring adequate oxygenation is a primary goal in surgical and medical patients to treat and prevent morbidity associated with hypoxemia. However, excessive oxygen administration resulting in hyperoxemia is common, leading to unnecessary utilization of supplemental oxygen, which is a particularly limited resource in austere settings. Building on the previous Strategy to Avoid Excessive Oxygen (SAVE-O2) clinical trials1 (Trauma: NCT045349559; Burn: NCT04534972), the investigators seek to determine effective strategies to implement a targeted normoxemia approach to avoid both hyperoxemia and hypoxemia and reduce supplemental oxygen use, using the PRO100 closed loop/autonomous oxygen system. This research is critical for both military and civilian care settings in determining the effectiveness of an autonomous oxygen system to use to 1) reduce harm associated with both hypoxemia and hyperoxemia and 2) reduce excess use of oxygen.

Objectives: the investigators propose the following two objectives:

Determine the effectiveness of an autonomous oxygen titration system to improve normoxemia and reduce hypoxemia and hyperoxemia in acutely injured and ill patients receiving supplemental oxygen. The investigators will compare patient-hours spent in normoxemia (SpO2 90-96%), hypoxemia (SpO2 <88%), and hyperoxemia (SpO2 >96%) among patients randomized to autonomous vs manual oxygen titration.

Determine the impact of an autonomous oxygen titration system on overall utilization of supplemental oxygen. The investigators will compare the total volume of supplemental oxygen administered to patients randomized to autonomous vs manual oxygen titration during the 72-hour intervention period.

Hypothesis

The investigators hypothesize that the use of an autonomous oxygen titration system will be more effective at maintaining normoxemia and reducing time spent in hypoxemia/hyperoxemia than standard manual titration in non-mechanically ventilated patients and will reduce the overall use of supplemental oxygen.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Hospitalized or will be hospitalized from Emergency Department for major trauma, burn, acute care surgery, or acute respiratory illness
  • Able to be randomized within 36 hours of hospital arrival
  • Receiving supplemental oxygen 1-10 liters per minute for documented or presumed hypoxemia (must be higher than baseline for those on chronic oxygen therapy)
  • Signed and dated informed consent from patient or legally authorized representative (LAR)

排除标准

  • Anticipated hospital discharge within 24 hours
  • Imminent plans to discontinue supplemental oxygen
  • Imminent plans to administer high flow nasal oxygen, non-invasive ventilation, or invasive mechanical ventilation
  • Clinical team unwilling or unable to follow the prescribed oxygen titration method in either randomized group
  • Known prisoner
  • Known pregnancy
  • Known contraindicated conditions for use of the PRO100 device: carbon monoxide poisoning, incapable of handling airway secretions, increased methemoglobin, cyanide poisoning, cluster headaches, undrained pneumothorax, sickle cell crisis, paraquat poisoning or a history of bleomycin poisoning, patients for whom the SpO2 signal is not stable

研究组 & 干预措施

Usual Care (Manual Titration)

No Intervention

Patients randomized to the usual care arm will receive usual care, manual oxygen titration, removal of supplemental oxygen, and escalation per hospital protocol, based on the site's usual SpO2 assessments. The SpO2 monitor for the O2matic PRO100 will also be connected to the patient in observation mode for data collection purposes only (not used for titration decisions).

Intervention (Automated Titration)

Experimental

Patients randomized to the intervention arm will receive supplemental oxygen via nasal cannula (recommended up to 6 lpm) or face mask (recommended up to 15 lpm) and will have supplemental oxygen titrated using an autonomous oxygen titration system for the first 72 hours after randomization, or hospital discharge (whichever sooner).

干预措施: Automated Titration (O2matic) (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

Proportion of time spent within the targeted normoxemia range

时间窗: during first 72 hours after randomization, censored at hospital discharge, escalation to high flow nasal oxygen/mechanical ventilation, or death if prior to 72 hours.

The primary endpoint is proportion of time spent within the targeted normoxemia range, defined as an oxygen saturation (SpO2) of 90-96% (target 93%), as measured by continuous non-invasive pulse oximetry, during the first 72 hours after randomization, censored at hospital discharge, escalation to high flow nasal oxygen/mechanical ventilation, or death if prior to 72 hours.

次要结局

  • Amount of supplemental oxygen administered(during first 72 hours after randomization)
  • Proportion of time spent in hypoxemia (SpO2<88%)(during first 72 hours after randomization)
  • Proportion of time spent in hyperoxemia (SpO2 >96%)(during first 72 hours after randomization)
  • Time to Room Air(censored at day 28, discharge if before day 28, or death.)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (8)

Loading locations...

相似试验