跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07671898
NCT07671898招募中不适用

Prospective Non-Randomized Comparison of Point-by-Point Cryoablation Using Freezor™ Xtra Versus Radiofrequency Ablation Using TactiFlex™ SE of Parasympathetic Ganglia (Cardioneuroablation) in Patients With Vagally-Mediated Bradyarrhythmias

Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2024年9月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
60
试验地点
1
主要终点
Recurrence of Bradyarrhythmia or Syncope

研究概览

简要总结

Bradyarrhythmias are conditions where the heart beats too slowly, causing symptoms like dizziness, fainting, and fatigue. In some patients, these slow heart rhythms are caused by overactivity of the vagus nerve (the part of the nervous system that slows the heart down).

Cardioneuroablation (CNA) is a catheter-based procedure that targets and reduces the effect of these overactive nerves on the heart. It is an alternative to permanent pacemaker implantation, especially for younger patients.

Traditionally, CNA is performed using radiofrequency (RF) energy to create small burns in specific areas of the heart. This study investigates whether focal cryoablation (freezing technology using the Freezor™ Xtra catheter) is as safe and effective as standard RF ablation for CNA.

This is a prospective, non-randomized study. Participants will receive either RF ablation (N=30) or cryoablation (N=30). The study will evaluate the recurrence of slow heart rhythms and fainting episodes, as well as any complications, over 12 months of follow-up.

详细描述

Background and Rationale

Cardioneuroablation is an emerging treatment for vagally-mediated bradyarrhythmias, including symptomatic sinus bradycardia, atrioventricular blocks, and vasovagal syncope with a cardioinhibitory component . The procedure targets ganglionated plexi located in the epicardial fat and myocardium, which contain parasympathetic nerve endings.

While radiofrequency (RF) energy is the standard modality for CNA, epicardial fat may limit RF lesion formation when fat thickness exceeds 3 mm. Cryoablation, by contrast, uniformly cools tissue without energy dissipation in fat, potentially offering more consistent ganglion ablation.

To date, no clinical study has compared focal cryoablation versus RF ablation specifically for cardioneuroablation.

Objectives

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 60 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Age 18 to 60 years;
  • •Symptomatic bradycardia (sinus bradycardia or bradycardia due to atrioventricular block, including transient);
  • •Severe asymptomatic sinus bradycardia (heart rate less than 30 beats per minute);
  • •Transient second- or third-degree atrioventricular block;
  • •Persistent second-degree atrioventricular block;
  • •Rhythm pauses greater than 6 seconds;
  • •Recurrent syncope or presyncope with documented association with bradycardia (without trauma);
  • •Positive response to atropine (heart rate increase ≥25% from baseline or >90 beats per minute) OR positive response to exercise (heart rate increase ≥25% from baseline or >90 beats per minute, OR conversion of second- or third-degree atrioventricular block to first-degree block or complete normalization of atrioventricular conduction during sinus rhythm);

排除标准

  • •Chronic antiarrhythmic drug therapy (ongoing);
  • •Presence of implanted pacemaker, cardiac resynchronization therapy device, or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator;
  • •Bradyarrhythmia secondary to medications;
  • •Bradyarrhythmia secondary to electrolyte imbalance (hyperkalemia);
  • •Bradyarrhythmia secondary to hypothyroidism;
  • •Bradyarrhythmia secondary to obstructive sleep apnea syndrome;
  • •Absence of response to pharmacological denervation (no heart rate increase after atropine administration up to maximum dose of 0.2 mg/kg);
  • •Clinically significant coronary artery disease;
  • •Post-myocardial infarction cardiosclerosis;
  • •Hemodynamically significant congenital heart disease (including surgically corrected);
  • •Stable ventricular tachycardia in the setting of bradycardia;
  • •History of stroke or transient ischemic attack;
  • •Prior open-heart surgery;
  • •Prior catheter-based coronary artery intervention or percutaneous coronary intervention;
  • •Pregnancy or breastfeeding; Age less than 18 years Age greater than 60 years

研究组 & 干预措施

CryoCNA

Experimental

干预措施: Focal Cryoablation (Procedure)

RF CNA

Active Comparator

干预措施: Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

Recurrence of Bradyarrhythmia or Syncope

时间窗: 12 months

Documented recurrence of symptomatic bradyarrhythmia (sinus bradycardia \<40 bpm, pause \>3 sec, AV block) or syncope confirmed by ECG or Holter

次要结局

  • Pericardial Effusion or Hemopericardium(Periprocedural (7 days))
  • Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia(12 months)
  • Vascular Access Complications(Periprocedural (7 days))
  • Change in Minimum Heart Rate(Baseline to 6 months)
  • Change in Maximum Heart Rate(Baseline to 6 months)
  • Change in Electrophysiological Parameters(Intraprocedural)
  • Change in Mean Heart Rate(Baseline to 6 months)

研究者

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验