Comparison Between Baska mask and I-gel for short duration surgeries
试验速览
- 阶段
- Phase 3 4
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 80
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- To measure the oropharyngeal leak pressure between the two devices.
研究概览
简要总结
ACOMPARISON BETWEEN BASKA MASK AND I-GEL
FOR SHORT DURATION SURGERIES
Patients undergoing general anaesthesia should have a secured airway especially in long duration surgeries. However, for shorter surgical procedures, the airway can be kept patent by the use of supraglottic airway devices without administering neuromuscular blockers thus lesser impact on patient’s hemodynamic s and lesser trauma to airway. Also these devices have high airway seal pressure with low resistance to gas flow , low incidence ofaspiration and complications . These are divided into first , second and third generation airway devices. The newest include Baska mask and I-GEL which have a cuffless sealing mechanism due to its thermoelastic material which can expand on heat , also preventing injury to airway and problems of maintaining sealing pressure . Both devices have an airwaychannel separate from gastric channel toprovide additional safety inlaparoscopic surgeries . They also have laryngoprotective properties.
I-GEL which is a second generation supraglottic airwaydevice made from styrene-ethylene- butylene. It has an additional bite block.It is also comparable to LMAs and proseal LMAs in insertion rates and sealingpressures.
Baska mask, introduced by Kanag and Meena Baska , a 3rdgenerational airway with one gastric channel and a pharyngeal channel with abite block. Various studies and journals supporting this thesis work has beendone . Studies have also been perfomed on laparoscopic surgeries , minorurological and gynaecologicalprocedures, in obese and spontaneously ventilating patients.
Shamugavelu et al. conducted a study comparing both i-Geland Baska mask in laparoscopic surgeries and concluded that both airways arecomparable with each other in larascopic surgeries and i-Gel is quicker toinsert whilst Baska gave a good airway seal.
Our study will compare Insertion time,Number of attempts required to insert, oropharyngeal leak pressure between thetwo devices. We will also assess hemodynamic stability of the patient andanalyse intraoperative and post operative airway related complications.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Computer generated randomization
- 盲法
- Not Applicable
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 70.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •1.ASA I and II patients 2.Mallampati grade 1 and 2.
排除标准
- •1.Patients with ASA III or above 2.anticipated difficult airway 3.patients with increased aspiration risk 4.BMI >30kg/m2.
结局指标
主要结局
To measure the oropharyngeal leak pressure between the two devices.
时间窗: To measure the oropharyngeal leak pressure between the two devices immediately after insertion and 30 mins after insertion | 2. Insertion time | 3. Number of attempts required to insert
2. Insertion time
时间窗: To measure the oropharyngeal leak pressure between the two devices immediately after insertion and 30 mins after insertion | 2. Insertion time | 3. Number of attempts required to insert
3. Number of attempts required to insert
时间窗: To measure the oropharyngeal leak pressure between the two devices immediately after insertion and 30 mins after insertion | 2. Insertion time | 3. Number of attempts required to insert
次要结局
- 1 To assess hemodynamical parameters of the patient(2 To analyse intraoperative & post operative airway related complications)