跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01315145
NCT01315145已完成不适用

MiDAS III (Mild® Decompression Alternative to Open Surgery): Vertos Mild Patient Evaluation Study

Vertos Medical, Inc.27 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 138 人开始时间: 2011年3月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
138
试验地点
27
主要终点
Percentage of Participants With a 2-point Improvement in Visual Analogue Scale

研究概览

简要总结

This is a multi-center, prospective, observational clinical study to compare patient outcomes following treatment with either the mild® procedure or epidural steroid injection in patients with moderate to severe lumbar spinal stenosis exhibiting neurogenic claudication.

详细描述

The study was initially designed as a randomized trial. Due to difficulty of enrollment, the study was amended and converted to an observational comparative study with study arm being self-selected by the patient.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
50 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with neurogenic claudication where the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of back and leg pain average is ≥
  • Prior failure of conservative therapy.
  • Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score of ≥ 31%.
  • Radiologic evidence of LSS, with unilateral or bilateral ligamentum flavum ≥ 4.1mm confirmed by pre-op MRI performed within 6-12 months of baseline visit.
  • Able to walk ≥ 10 feet before being limited by pain.
  • Available to complete 24-months of follow-up.
  • Adults ≥ 50 years of age.

排除标准

  • Prior surgery at intended treatment level.
  • History of spinal fractures with current related pain symptoms.
  • Motor deficit or disabling back and/or leg pain from causes other than LSS neurogenic claudication (e.g. acute compression fracture, metabolic neuropathy, vascular claudication symptoms, etc.).
  • Significant/symptomatic disc protrusion or osteophyte formation judged by the Investigator as possible confounding factor to study results.
  • Excessive facet hypertrophy judged by the Investigator as possible confounding factor to study results.
  • Significant symptomatic foraminal stenosis.
  • Confirmed anterior or retro-listhesis ≥ 3mm.
  • Bleeding disorders and/or current use of anti-coagulants with the inability to withhold anticoagulants for required time prior to procedure.
  • Able to walk ≥ 200 yards unaided in erect non-flexed position before being limited by pain.
  • Able to stand ≥ 15 minutes in erect, non-flexed position before being limited by pain.
  • Use of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) within 7 days of treatment.
  • Pregnant and/or breastfeeding.
  • Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 32 as calculated using the patient's weight multiplied by 703 then divided by height in inches squared.
  • Epidural steroid, systemic steroid or any spine interventional procedure within prior six weeks of study procedure.
  • Dementia and/or inability to give informed consent and to understand and complete follow-up patient reported outcomes forms.
  • Inability of the patient to lie prone for any reason with anesthesia support (e.g. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), obesity, etc.).
  • On (or pending) Workman's Compensation or known to be considering litigation associated with back pain.
  • Unable to tolerate MRI (pacemaker, spinal cord stimulator, etc.).
  • Intrathecal pump.
  • Any medical condition determined by the Investigator that would not allow subject to fulfill trial requirements or safely tolerate procedures in this study.

研究组 & 干预措施

Percutaneous Lumbar Decompression

Active Comparator

Patients receiving percutaneous decompression using the mild® Device Kit.

干预措施: Percutaneous Lumbar Decompression (Procedure)

Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injection

Active Comparator

Injection of epidural steroids into the lumbar spine

干预措施: Epidural Steroid Injection (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Percentage of Participants With a 2-point Improvement in Visual Analogue Scale

时间窗: 16 weeks

The primary endpoint for evaluating effectiveness will be the proportion of subjects in each group achieving at least a 2-point improvement from baseline in the Visual Analog Scale.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Industry
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (27)

Loading locations...

相似试验