跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05881590
NCT05881590已完成不适用

Real-world Evidence Feasibility Trial, in Both Community and Hospital-based Settings, for a Technology-enabled Hybrid Service Delivery Model for Pulmonary Rehabilitation: Assessing Patient Uptake and Adherence, and Impact on Patient Outcomes and Service Capacity.

Anglia Ruskin University2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 69 人开始时间: 2023年5月4日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
69
试验地点
2
主要终点
Feasibility - recruitment

研究概览

简要总结

Pulmonary rehabilitation is an exercise and education programme that helps improve breathlessness and quality of life for people living with lung and breathing problems. It improves exercise levels and breathlessness and is a recommended treatment for people with lung diseases and symptoms. Standard pulmonary rehabilitation programmes involve individuals attending group classes at hospitals or community centres, twice a week for 8 weeks. These classes are supervised by physiotherapists. At the moment, there are long waiting times for pulmonary rehabilitation in the NHS.

Some patients may prefer more pulmonary rehabilitation based in their own home. This might be because they find it difficult to travel to classes. Some would like to do more home pulmonary rehabilitation in between supervised classes or continue pulmonary rehabilitation after the 8-week supervised programme. The blending between supervised classes and home pulmonary rehabilitation is known as HYBRID PULMONARY REHABILITATION. Hybrid pulmonary rehabilitation is not being provided routinely in the NHS, but the NHS would like to see it used more as it might help reduce waiting times and give patients more choice on how to access pulmonary rehabilitation.

The study will assess the feasibility of a larger study to provide strong evidence on patients' uptake and adherence to the hybrid programme, and the impact on patients' health outcomes and service delivery. The investigators will also look at what measures would be best to use in a larger study.

The study will recruit up to 100 patients. These individuals will be aged 18 years or older, have respiratory disease and a referral for pulmonary rehabilitation. Individuals with reasons why they cannot exercise will be excluded.

Participants will be provided with an application (App) that can be installed on a mobile phone. This App is called Active+me REMOTE and is made by a company called Aseptika Ltd (www.activ8rlives.com). Active+me REMOTE provides live online, video exercise classes; pre-recorded exercise classes; a walking programme; educational talks; and a care plan personalised for the user.

Data will be collected at the beginning and end of the hybrid pulmonary rehabilitation programme and will include routinely collected data as part of usual care. Additional data will be collected via the App and trial surveys. The investigators will ask staff and patients about the experiences of the new way of delivering rehabilitation and explore how cost effective it is.

详细描述

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) for patients with respiratory disease, e.g. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and bronchiectasis, improves exercise capacity, quality-of-life and provides vital education for condition management. PR is now recommended for all COPD patients (NICE guidelines NG115).

A standard PR programme involves two, in-person, exercise classes per week over a period of 8 weeks after which the patient is discharged to self-care. While retaining some in-person contact, technology could increase access and automate delivery of education and exercise by overcoming shortages of skilled staff. New technology exists to allow the delivery of a hybrid PR programme which may be used to support a move to a remotely delivered service (with patients having the opportunity to attend in-person PR sessions during the programme if they need the motivation or support of an in-person session).

This study will use the UKCA/CE Class I-approved and DTAC-certified Active+me REMOTE App (Aseptika Ltd www.activ8rlives.com). The Active+me App, accessible by patients on their smartphones with Bluetooth or connected medical monitors, includes remote tracking of adherence, symptoms and physiological parameters (where appropriate); live, online video exercise classes; pre-recorded classes; a paced walking programme; an educational programme delivered in bite-sized pieces; and personalised care plans for every patient.

Generally, NICE guidance draws on randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to inform guidelines however RCTs are costly and time consuming for digital healthcare and this delays uptake and adoption by the NHS. New and innovative approaches to obtaining effectiveness evidence for digitally delivered healthcare are urgently needed and new approaches and solutions are being reviewed by NICE. This feasibility study will use a real-world study design drawing on routinely collected data to compare outcomes for patients recruited to a Hybrid PR Intervention with a propensity-matched Control Group that has previously received Standard PR. Additional data will be collected from the Hybrid PR group (via Active+me REMOTE / Trial Surveys) to provide supporting evidence relating to uptake, adherence, clinical outcomes (not routinely recorded in standard practice), and usability/acceptability of the Hybrid PR programme.

Patients with chronic respiratory disease who are referred to the Harefield Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programme will be screened for eligibility to participate in the Hybrid PR Trial. Informed consent will obtained in eligible patients who wish to take part. Recruited participants will follow a hybrid PR programme (Intervention Group). The Control Group will be patients that have previously received a standard pulmonary rehabilitation programme and are matched on specified criteria including age, sex, measure of respiratory disability, index of multiple deprivation, exercise capacity and hospital vs community location.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Supportive Care
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Are aged 18 years or older
  • Have a grade of 2 - 5 on the MRC Dyspnoea Scale and are referred for pulmonary rehabilitation
  • Are willing and have capacity to consent to take part in the trial

排除标准

  • contraindications to exercise (e.g. unstable cardiac disease)

结局指标

主要结局

Feasibility - recruitment

时间窗: 4 months

Frequency of reasons for non-participation

Feasibility - patient recruitment rates

时间窗: 4 months (recruitment rate: 6 patients per week)

Number of patients recruited within the anticipated recruitment timeframe of the study

Feasibility - participant retention rates

时间窗: 6 months [from recruitment start to end of data collection]

The percentage of participants who do not withdraw from the study once consented

Feasibility - Success of integrating hybrid pulmonary rehabilitation into routine practice

时间窗: 5-6 months

Qualitative feedback via focus groups from pulmonary rehabilitation staff teams

Feasibility - patient/staff acceptability of the hybrid pulmonary rehabilitation programme

时间窗: 5-6 months

Qualitative feedback via interviews/focus groups from patients/pulmonary rehabilitation staff teams

Feasibility - Availability of data for primary and secondary outcomes of a larger definitive trial

时间窗: At the end of the 8-week intervention

The percentage of missing data extracted from routine records and trial surveys

Feasibility - success of propensity matching of control group

时间窗: Baseline

Similarities in the baseline characteristics of intervention arm and retrospective control group including: age (years); sex (M/F); measure of respiratory disability (Grade 0-4), socioeconomic status (index of multiple deprivation); exercise capacity (incremental shuffle walk test); and hospital vs community setting.

Feasibility - safety of the hybrid pulmonary rehabilitation programme

时间窗: 6 months [from recruitment start to end of data collection]

Number of adverse events recorded in participants

次要结局

  • Changes in knowledge, skills, and confidence to manage health and wellbeing(Change from baseline until the end of the 8-week intervention/programme)
  • Changes in disease knowledge(Change from baseline until the end of the 8-week intervention/programme)
  • Number of reported symptoms during the hybrid pulmonary rehabilitation programme(Change from baseline until the end of the 8-week intervention/programme)
  • Changes in anxiety measures(Change from baseline until the end of the 8-week intervention/programme)
  • Changes in depression measures(Change from baseline until the end of the 8-week intervention/programme)
  • Health care resources - health care professionals time(At the end of the 8-week intervention)
  • Drop out rate from pulmonary rehabilitation(At the end of the 8-week intervention/programme)
  • Pulmonary rehabilitation class sessions completed(At the end of the 8-week intervention/programme)
  • Changes in exercise capacity measures(Change from baseline until the end of the 8-week intervention/programme)
  • Changes in symptoms(Change from baseline until the end of the 8-week intervention/programme)
  • Patient costs(At the end of the 8-week intervention)
  • Health care resources - service capacity(At the end of the 8-week intervention)
  • Patient uptake of the hybrid pulmonary rehabilitation programme(At the end of the 8-week intervention)
  • Adherence to the hybrid pulmonary rehabilitation programme (activity adherence)(At the end of the 8-week intervention)
  • Adherence to the hybrid pulmonary rehabilitation programme (educational adherence)(At the end of the 8-week intervention)
  • Adherence to the hybrid pulmonary rehabilitation programme (medication adherence)(At the end of the 8-week intervention)
  • Health care resources - waiting times(At the end of the 8-week intervention)
  • Changes in lower limb function(Change from baseline until the end of the 8-week intervention/programme)
  • Changes in health-related quality of life(Change from baseline until the end of the 8-week intervention/programme)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验