Socio-ecological Intervention to Promote Active Commuting to Work
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 1,500
- 试验地点
- 4
- 主要终点
- Change in accelerometer-based daily duration of walking and cycling to work
研究概览
简要总结
Background Cycling and walking to work is a natural way of increasing physical activity in a working population. However, the evidence on the effectiveness and cost savings of promoting active work commuting (ACW) is thin. This cluster-randomized, controlled study aims to promote ACW with environmental, social and behavioral strategies in two large workplace areas in Tampere, Finland. The paper de-scribes the protocol, evaluation and baseline findings of the study.
Methods The enrollment of the workplaces took place in 2014-15. In Phase 1, the impacts of environmental strategies (improvements to the walking and cycling trails) were evaluated in Area1 including 11 workplaces. In Phase 2, five more workplaces were recruited from Area2 to evaluate the impacts of social and behavioral strategies accustomed for each workplace. The workplaces in both areas were then randomized into experimental (EXP, n=6+2) and comparison group (COM, n=5+3). EXP promoted ACW with social and behavioral strategies; COM participated in data collection only but will have the same support post-intervention. The primary outcome is the change in employees' self-reported and accelerometer-based ACW. The secondary outcomes include e.g. the changes in employees' self-rated health and subjective wellbeing at work, the change in the number of walkers and cyclists based on the traffic calculations and the change in the quality of walking and cycling trails based on camera auditing (Area1 only). External validity of the intervention is as-sessed with the compliance rates of the workplaces and employees as well as with the fidelity of the environmental, social and behavioral strategies. Health Economic Assessment Tool for Cycling and Walking (HEAT) is used to assess the cost savings of the multilevel intervention. In addition, environmental variables and types that promote ACW and mediate and moderate the effects of environmental strategies are examined.
Results and discussion This study is one of the first in Finland to combine interdisciplinary collaboration between practi-tioners and researchers working in the fields of transportation, urban design, physical activity and sustainable development to promote ACW. The findings benefit all stakeholders interested in pro-moting ACW in urban context. The study will also produce supportive material for promoting ACW at the workplaces.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Other
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •All voluntary employees in the workplaces located in the specific area
排除标准
- •No exclusion criteria
研究组 & 干预措施
KÄPY group
Workplaces, which are supported to promote employees' ACW.
干预措施: KÄPY (Behavioral)
Comparison group
Workplaces, which are not supported to promote employees' ACW but will be offered support to do so after the study.
结局指标
主要结局
Change in accelerometer-based daily duration of walking and cycling to work
时间窗: 1 year
Daily minutes of AWC (mean)
Change in self-reported means of transportation to work
时间窗: 1 year
Proportion of employees walking or cycling to work (%)
Change in self-reported weekly AWC
时间窗: 1 year
Mean number of days employees walk or cycle to work
次要结局
- Change in self-rated health(1 year)
- Change in injuries due to ACW(1 year)
- Change in subjective well-being at work(1 year)
- Change in the quality of the main walking and cycling trail(1 year)
- Change in motivation for ACW(1 year)
- Change in the use of the main walking and cycling trail (Area1)(1 year)
- Change in restrictions to ACW(1 year)
研究者
Minna Aittasalo
Senior Researcher
UKK Institute
