A Comparison of the Effect of Suture Material on Blepharoplasty Incision
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 23
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Patient Observer Scar Assessment Scale
研究概览
简要总结
The objective is to compare the effect of suture material on blepharoplasty incision. Outcomes of blepharoplasty scar and/or cosmesis will be compared between plain gut and polypropylene suture. Additionally, the study will assess whether certain Fitzpatrick skin types are associated with increased rates of poor outcomes after blepharoplasty.
详细描述
Upper eyelid blepharoplasty is commonly performed surgical procedure. The procedure involves excising excess eyelid skin (sometimes with associated orbicularis oculi muscle and orbital fat). It generally has low risk with high success rate. Although blepharoplasty is usually performed for functional reasons, it can also be performed for purely cosmetic indications. Regardless the indication, patients still expect optimal cosmetic results. Various marking and surgical techniques have been described to maximize functional and aesthetic outcomes. However, there are lacking studies on the optimal suture material for upper blepharoplasty. A comprehensive review of the literature reveals three studies which discuss blepharoplasty outcomes related to suture material. The outcomes of all these studies were heavily influenced by subjective interpretation.
Skin incisions can be closed with adhesives, sutures, staples, or allowed to secondarily granulate. There are many published reports on suture reaction and post-operative results on the face, body, and extremities. However, the eyelid skin is unique - it is the thinnest in the body. Post-operative edema, erythema, cyst and scar formation can have an effect on the cosmetic outcome.
Sutures are the most common method used for closure in this setting. Types of sutures used in clinical practice include absorbable gut and polyglactin and non-absorbable polypropylene, nylon, and polyester. Sutures are most commonly placed as either a continuous running or subcuticular passes with and without reinforcing interrupted sutures. Anecdotally, suture-related complications have been observed in specific racial skin types as well as with various suture materials. Results of this study could lead to a more patient specific blepharoplasty with better and more predictable outcomes therefore improving patient care.
Patients in the outpatient oculoplastics clinic will be evaluated for dermatochalasis and approved for upper blepharoplasty. Enrollment and consent into the study will be performed by the study coordinator. The purpose of the study, risks, benefits, and alternatives will be explained to the patient.
If the patient is interested, he or she will be asked to sign a consent form for both the blepharoplasty procedure and the study. On the day of the procedure, the patient's eyelids and sutures will be randomized. The procedure on each eyelid will performed by the same surgeon.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 89 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Patients 18-89 years old
- •Patients who qualify for functional blepharoplasty
排除标准
- •Patients <18 or >89 years old
- •Previous eyelid surgery
- •History of connective tissue disease
- •Mental handicap
- •Pregnant women
- •Incarcerated persons
研究组 & 干预措施
Plain gut suture on right eyelid
Plain gut suture closure of blepharoplasty incision
干预措施: Randomized laterality of suture materials for closure (6-0 polypropylene monofilament suture vs fast absorbing gut suture on right eyelid) (Procedure)
Polypropylene suture on right eyelid
Polypropylene suture closure of blepharoplasty incision
干预措施: Randomized laterality of suture materials for closure (6-0 polypropylene monofilament suture vs fast absorbing gut suture on right eyelid) (Procedure)
结局指标
主要结局
Patient Observer Scar Assessment Scale
时间窗: 3 months
This validated scale has the patient and observer grade their scar on different components. The observer rates on vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, surface area, and overall opinion. This is done on a 1 - 10 scale with 1 being completely normal skin and 10 being the worst scar imaginable. The patient rates the scar based on pain, itching, color, stiffness, thickness, irregularity, and overall opinion. This is graded on a 1 - 10 scale with 1 being No (absolutely not) and 10 being Yes (absolutely yes). The outcome is a difference of \> or = 3-points.
次要结局
- Adverse outcomes per Fitzpatrick skin type(3 months)
研究者
Michael Yoon
Associate Professor, Oculoplastics
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
