跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02383615
NCT02383615已完成不适用

A Comparison of Two Different Ultrasound-Guided Approaches to the Saphenous Nerve Block - Adductor Canal vs. Distal Trans-sartorial: A Prospective, Randomized, Blinded, Non-Inferiority Trial

University of Iowa0 个研究点目标入组 120 人开始时间: 2013年4月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
120
主要终点
Success rate of the saphenous nerve block

研究概览

简要总结

Saphenous nerve blocks can be technically challenging. Recently described ultrasound techniques have improved the success rate of saphenous nerve blocks, but randomized controlled trials comparing these techniques are lacking. The investigators compared two common ultrasound guided approach for saphenous nerve block: saphenous nerve block at the adductor canal (ACSNB) vs. block by the distal trans-sartorial (DTSNB) approach.

详细描述

Patients received either ACSNB or DTSNB in this prospective randomized, blinded, non-inferiority clinical trial. The primary objective was to show the non-inferiority of ACSNB to DTSNB in terms of block success. Secondary outcome measures were time required to perform the block, time to onset of successful block, and the visibility of the nerve using ultrasound.

Sample size calculation: To address the primary objective of the study--to show non-inferiority of the ACSNB to DTSNB in terms of success as defined above- the investigators used the test of non-inferiority of two proportions. DTSNB is the primary technique of doing saphenous nerve block at the investigators' institution. From chart review of the electronic records from 2011 to 2012, the investigators found there was a 3% incidence of rescue blocks among saphenous nerve blocks (19 out of 667 blocks) at their institution. This assumed a success rate of approximately 97%. A study by Saranteas et al reported a success rate of 95.6% in healthy volunteers undergoing saphenous nerve block just after it exited from the adductor canal. Based on these two observations, the investigators expected the success rate of DTSNB to be 95%. To establish the non-inferiority of ACSNB to DTSNB, the investigators pre-determined that the success rate of ACSNB should not be lower than 85% (the expected difference in proportions should be less than (95% - 85%) 10%). Under these assumptions, to achieve 80% power, with a one-sided type I error rate of 0.05, the study needed 59 subjects per group; 118 patients total. 120 patients were enrolled for this study., randomized to receive either ACSNB (n=58) or DTSNB (n=62).To show the non-inferiority of the ACSNB to DTSNB, the upper 95% confidence bound of the success rates (πDTSNB - πACSNB) should be less than 10%.

The normality of continuous variables was tested by the Shapiro Wilk's test. Based on the normality assumption, two independent samples t-test or Mann-Whitney U test was performed for continuous variables. Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was performed for categorical variables.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Supportive Care
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
17 Years 至 70 Years(Child, Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients undergoing elective foot and ankle surgery receiving saphenous nerve block for pain management
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA PS) scores 1, 2 and 3

排除标准

  • Neuropathy
  • Allergy to local anesthetics
  • ASA PS scores 4 and 5

结局指标

主要结局

Success rate of the saphenous nerve block

时间窗: 30 minutes

Loss of pin prick sensation to 2 of the 3 pre-defined areas of saphenous nerve distribution in the operative leg after performing the nerve block.

次要结局

  • Nerve visibility under ultrasound(30 minutes)
  • Speed of onset of saphenous nerve block(30 minutes)
  • Time taken to perform block(30 minutes)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Anil A Marian

Clinical Associate Professor

University of Iowa

相似试验